Skip to main content


  • Extended genome report
  • Open Access

Genome sequence and description of the anaerobic lignin-degrading bacterium Tolumonas lignolytica sp. nov.

  • 1,
  • 2, 3,
  • 3, 4, 5,
  • 2, 6,
  • 7,
  • 7,
  • 8,
  • 8,
  • 8,
  • 8 and
  • 1Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences201510:106

  • Received: 2 March 2015
  • Accepted: 10 November 2015
  • Published:


Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T sp. nov. is the type strain of T. lignolytica sp. nov., a proposed novel species of the Tolumonas genus. This strain was isolated from tropical rainforest soils based on its ability to utilize lignin as a sole carbon source. Cells of Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T are mesophilic, non-spore forming, Gram-negative rods that are oxidase and catalase negative. The genome for this isolate was sequenced and returned in seven unique contigs totaling 3.6Mbp, enabling the characterization of several putative pathways for lignin breakdown. Particularly, we found an extracellular peroxidase involved in lignin depolymerization, as well as several enzymes involved in β-aryl ether bond cleavage, which is the most abundant linkage between lignin monomers. We also found genes for enzymes involved in ferulic acid metabolism, which is a common product of lignin breakdown. By characterizing pathways and enzymes employed in the bacterial breakdown of lignin in anaerobic environments, this work should assist in the efficient engineering of biofuel production from lignocellulosic material.


  • Anaerobic lignin degradation
  • Tropical forest soil isolate
  • Tolumonas


The exponential increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions following the industrial revolution has drastically affected the climate of Earth, inspiring the need to produce clean, renewable energy with the goal of mitigating the consequences of burning fossil fuels. Second generation biofuels are a promising source of sustainable energy because they are derived from lignocellulose, the most abundant natural polymer on Earth. However, this material is highly recalcitrant due to the occlusion of cellulose by lignin, and the microbial pathways for lignin degradation are not yet well understood.

Lignin is a complex aromatic heteropolymer present in the cell wall of all plants, and comprises 10–30 % of cell wall material [1]. Lignin forms intricate associations with cellulose, the most abundant component within the cell wall, and serves as defense for plants, blocking access of cellulase enzymes to resist microbial breakdown. Consequently, the production of biofuels from plant biomass is physically and chemically hindered by lignin and its links to cellulose [1]. Aerobic lignin degradation has been extensively studied in fungi, suggesting that lignolytic extracellular peroxidase and laccase enzymes play a significant role in the mineralization of lignin in soil [2, 3]. Recent studies focusing on bacterial breakdown and modification of lignin have found that members of the phylogenetic groups Alphaproteobacteria , Gammaproteobacteria , Firmicutes and Actinomycetes are major players in lignin degradation, in both soil and insect guts [4]. Among bacterial lignin or phenol degraders, Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6 produces a β-aryl etherase [5], and Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 contains a β-ketoadipate pathway [6]; Kocuria and Staphylococcus also likely degrade aromatic compounds derived from lignocellulose [7]. Although many lignolytic bacteria grow in environments where oxygen is depleted [8], it has been suggested that they employ oxygen-requiring peroxidases, similar to the ones utilized by fungi [9].

To address the need for more efficient removal of the lignin portion of lignocellulose to streamline biofuel production, we isolated anaerobic bacteria from tropical rainforest soil in Puerto Rico. Humid tropical forest soils like those from the Long Term Ecological Research Station at the Luquillo Experimental Forest in Puerto Rico have been shown to have among the fastest rates of plant litter decomposition globally [10], despite their low and fluctuating redox potential [11]. Frequent episodes of anoxia at the Luquillo Forest inhibit fungal growth [12], suggesting that bacteria are responsible for the observed litter decomposition, and consequently providing an optimal environment for isolating bacteria involved in the anaerobic decomposition of plant litter, including cellulose and lignin compounds. Bacteria are more amenable to genetic modification than fungi and thus are more easily incorporated into biofuel processing technology, for instance through metabolic engineering. Additionally, bacteria capable of metabolizing lignin anaerobically are favorable to industrial biofuel production, considering that current technology relies on anaerobic digestors to process plant waste into biofuels [13]. With this in mind, we isolated and characterized a bacterium capable of anaerobic lignin degradation, Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T sp. nov., and provide a summary of its genome sequence and annotation.

Organism information

Classification and features

Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T was isolated from soil collected at the Bisley watershed site of the El Yunque National Forest in Puerto Rico, part of the Luquillo Experimental Forest in Luquillo, Puerto Rico, USA (Table 1; Additional file 1). Soils were diluted in water and used to inoculate anaerobic roll tubes containing a modified CCMA media consisting of 2.8 g L−1 NaCl, 0.1 g L−1 KCl, 27 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 1.25 mM NH4Cl, 9.76 g L−1 MES, 1.1 ml L−1 K2HPO4, 12.5 ml L−1 trace minerals [14, 15], and 1 ml L−1 Thauer’s vitamins [16], with alkali lignin added as the sole source of carbon. Tubes were incubated at ambient temperature for 3 months before colonies were picked and characterized.
Table 1

Classification and general features of Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1




Evidence codea



Domain Bacteria

TAS [45, 46]


Phylum Proteobacteria

TAS [47]


Class Gammaproteobacteria

TAS [48]


Order Aeromonadales

TAS [49]


Family Aeromonadaceae

TAS [50]


Genus Tolumonas

TAS [51]


Species Tolumonas lignolytica


Strain BRL6-1T


Gram stain




Cell shape












Temperature range

15–37 °C



Optimum temperature

30 °C



pH range; Optimum

4.5–8.5; 7


Carbon source

glucose, lactose, others (Table 6)




Tropical forest soil

TAS [52]



1 % NaCl



Oxygen requirement

Facultative aerobe



Biotic relationship








Geographic location

Soil collected from a subtropical lower montane wet forest in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, part of the NSF- sponsored Long-Term Ecological Research program in Puerto Rico



Sample collection

July 2009




18.268 N




65.760 W




375 m


aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS, Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [53]

Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T cells are Gram-negative, facultative rods capable of growth from 15 to 37 °C and pH 4.5–8.5 (Fig. 1). Colonies on 10 % Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates appear as white, flat circles with opaque centers and translucent halos.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Photomicrograph of Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T. The sample was prepared by growing a culture overnight in 10 % Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB), then adhering to microscope slide coverslips that were treated with poly-lysine to facilitate attachment of cells. The image was taken with a Nikon E500 Fluorescence Microscope

Sanger sequencing was performed on the small subunit ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene using universal primers 27F and 1492R [17]. BLAST analysis shows 97 % identity to the full length 16S rRNA gene of Tolumonas auensis type strain TA 4, indicating BRL6-1T as a potentially novel species of the Tolumonas genus, within the Aeromonadaceae family of the Gammaproteobacteria (Fig. 2a). Since the 16S rRNA gene sequence is not sufficient to clearly define the evolutionary history of this cluster of the Gammaproteobacteria , a hierarchical clustering of whole genomes based on COGS was constructed [18] (Fig. 2b). This clustering supports the placement of T. lignolytica BRL6-1T as a novel species within the Tolumonas genus.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T among the Aeromonadales. a The phylogenetic tree based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [54] within MEGA6 [55]. Bootstrap values of 1000 replicate trees are shown at the branches [56]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method [57] and are in units of the number of base substitutions per site. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated, creating a total of 1234 positions in the final dataset. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses after strain numbers. Type strains are indicated with a superscript T. Organisms with genomes available are indicated by an asterisk before the name. b Whole genomes were hierarchically clustered based on COG profiles using tools in IMG [58]. T. lignolytica BRL6-1T is indicated in bold in both phylogenetic trees

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T was selected for sequencing based on its ability to utilize lignin as a sole carbon source. Genome sequencing was performed by the JGI and completed on February 22, 2013 and the genome was presented for public access on IMG M/ER on August 28, 2013. Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [19].
Table 2

Sequencing project information





Finishing quality

High-quality draft


Libraries used

Three libraries: Illumina std shotgun library, Illumina long insert mate pair library, Pacbio SMRTbell™ library


Sequencing platforms

Illumina HiSeq 2000, PacBio RS


Fold coverage

2680X, 1157X, 33X





Gene calling method

Prodigal, GenePRIMP


Locus Tag



GenBank ID



GenBank Date of Release

May 23, 2014








Source Material Identifier

In submission


Project relevance

Biofuels, Environmental

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

For genomic DNA extraction, strain BRL6-1T was grown overnight in 10 % TSB at 30 °C with shaking at 225 rpm. Genomic DNA for sequencing was obtained following a modified cetyl-trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction protocol established by the DOE Joint Genome Institute. Modifications were as follows: 1) Overnight cultures were resuspended to an OD@600 nm of 0.5, instead of 1.0; 2) Lysozyme incubation was carried out at 37 °C for 30 min; 3) Proteinase K incubation was carried out for 3 h; 4) the concentration of Proteinase K was doubled. The extracted DNA was quantified using the Invitrogen™ Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA Assay Kit and measured using the PicoGreen Fluorescence protocol on the SpectraMax M2 Microplate Reader by Molecular Devices. Genomic DNA samples were verified as strain BRL6-1T via 16S rRNA gene sequencing before being shipped to JGI for genome sequencing.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The draft genome of strain BRL6-1T was generated at the DOE Joint Genome Institute using both Illumina and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) technologies. An Illumina standard shotgun library and long insert mate pair library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform [20]. 64,682,509 reads totaling 9702.4 Mb were generated from the standard shotgun and 45,878,643 reads totaling 4175.0 Mb were generated from the long insert mate pair library. A Pacbio SMRTbell™ library was constructed and sequenced on the PacBio RS platform. 41,131 raw PacBio reads yielded 41,162 adapter-trimmed and quality filtered subreads totaling 118.4 Mb. All raw Illumina sequence data was passed through DUK, a filtering program developed at JGI, which removes known Illumina sequencing and library preparation artifacts [21]. Filtered Illumina and PacBio reads were assembled using AllpathsLG as previously described [22]. The total size of the genome is 3.6 Mb. The final draft assembly contained 9 contigs in 9 scaffolds, and was based on 9669.4 Mb of Illumina Std PE, 4174.1 Mb of Illumina CLIP PE and 118.4 Mb of PacBio post filtered data, which provides an average 3837X Illumina coverage and 32.8X PacBio coverage of the genome, respectively.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [23], followed by a round of manual curation using GenePRIMP [24]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [25] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNA genes were found by searches against models of the ribosomal RNA genes built from SILVA [26]. Other non-coding RNAs such as the RNA components of the protein secretion complex and the RNase P were identified by searching the genome for the corresponding Rfam profiles using INFERNAL [27]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform [28] developed by the Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA [29].

Genome properties

One chromosomal origin of replication, located at position 1,760,186–1,760,733 bp of contig 1 was identified, suggesting that the genome contains only one chromosome of at least 3.187Mbp (Fig. 3). The location was determined using the Z-curve method [3032], which utilizes base pair disparities to create a unique three-dimensional graph of the genome using Ori-Finder software [33]. Although nine contigs are presented in the GenBank record (for the genome AZUK00000000.1), contigs 5 and 9 were direct repeats of sequences contained in the other contigs, so we hypothesized that they are repeated scaffolds and excluded them from our analyses (Table 3). Due to remarkably high repeat content at the ends of contigs, we were unable to close the gaps between them using regular sequencing methods. The contigs may be part of the chromosome, but a plasmid extraction indicated the presence of at least one plasmid. A search through the PATRIC database of plasmid sequences shows that contigs 2–8, excluding 5, all have homology to known plasmid sequences, using maximum E-value of 1e−5 [34]. Furthermore, contigs 3,4,7, and 8 have annotated genes commonly found in plasmids, such as toxin-antitoxin sequences, prevent-host-death family sequences, and plasmid maintenance and stabilization protein genes, making them likely candidates.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Z-curve graph of T. lignolytica BRL6-1T contig 1. The Z-curve graph was made using Ori-Finder software. The sequence is rotated such that the beginning and ending are the maximum of the GC disparity curve. The short vertical red line indicates the location of the indicator gene dnaA, while purple peaks with diamonds indicate DnaA box clusters. The shift in base pair disparity coincides with the location of the dnaA gene and a large cluster of DnaA boxes, which together strongly suggest the location of the origin of replication. MK disparity represents the ratio of amino (A,C) to keto (G,T) bases, while RY disparity represents the ratio of purine (A,G) to pyrimidine (C,T) bases. Finally, the AT and GC disparities represent the ratio of weak to strong hydrogen bond forming bases, respectively

Table 3

Summary of genome: one chromosome and six other contigs


Size (kb)


INSDC identifier

Chromosome 1




Contig 2




Contig 3




Contig 4




Contig 6




Contig 7




Contig 8




Of the 3427 predicted genes, 3323 were identified as protein-encoding genes, while 131 RNA genes were found. Of the total protein coding genes identified, 75.02 % were assigned to a putative function. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 3, 4 and 5.
Table 4

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome



% of total

Genome size (bp)



DNA coding (bp)



DNA G+C (bp)



DNA scaffolds



Total genes



Protein coding genes



RNA genes



Pseudo genes



Genes in internal clusters



Genes with function prediction



Genes assigned to COGs



Genes with Pfam domains



Genes with signal peptides



Genes with transmembrane helices



CRISPR repeats


The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 5

Number of genes associated with COG functional categories



% age





Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis




RNA processing and modification








Replication, recombination and repair




Chromatin structure and dynamics




Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning




Defense mechanisms




Signal transduction mechanisms




Cell wall/membrane biogenesis




Cell motility




Intracellular trafficking and secretion




Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones




Energy production and conversion




Carbohydrate transport and metabolism




Amino acid transport and metabolism




Nucleotide transport and metabolism




Coenzyme transport and metabolism




Lipid transport and metabolism




Inorganic ion transport and metabolism




Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism




General function prediction only




Function unknown



Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Insights from the genome sequence

Genome to genome comparisons

Once the genome of strain BRL6-1T was sequenced, we were able to compare it to the genome of T. auensis , its closest relative. The two genomes have an average nucleotide identity (ANI) of 84 %, far below the 95 % threshold for species delineation [35]. A tool developed by DSMZ called the genome to genome distance calculator (GGDC) compares genome sequences to databases of DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) data [36]. It estimates the DDH between these two genomes to be 23.10 % +/− 2.37, again far below the species threshold (70 %). The GGDC also uses logistic regression to estimate the probability that DDH > 70 %, i.e. the two genomes belong to the same species. The GGDC calculated a <0.01 % chance that DDH > 70 % between the genomes of strain BRL6-1T and T. auensis . These data support the assertion that strain BRL6-1T is a novel species.

Oxidative enzymes

To facilitate physiological comparisons among the species within the Tolumonas genus, T. auensis and T. osonensis were acquired from the DSMZ culture collection in Germany. Oxidase tests confirmed that all three Tolumonas species, including Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T, are negative for oxidation of cytochrome c, as colonies did not change color when applied to BD BBL™ DrySlide™ test strips. However, oxidative enzyme assays show that all three organisms are capable of oxidizing 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-DOPA), a compound that is utilized as a lignin analog (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Oxidase and peroxidase enzyme activity for three Tolumonas organisms. Oxidative enzyme assays were performed by incubating isolates in nutrient broth with 25 mM L-DOPA. Peroxidase enzyme assays were performed in the same manner, with the addition of 3 % hydrogen peroxide. A negative control without inoculum was also measured and subtracted from experimental values

A catalase test was performed on each Tolumonas organism by dropping 3 % hydrogen peroxide on cultures that had incubated at 30 °C for 20 h. T. lignolytica and T. auensis had very weak positive reactions, while T. osonensis exhibited a much stronger phenotype. However, all three organisms showed relatively strong peroxidase enzyme activity (Fig. 4B). A search through the genomes of T. auensis and T. lignolytica shows that both organisms possess just one copy of the same enzyme with putative catalase activity (EC:, while each genome contains several peroxidase genes. T. osonensis does not have its genome sequenced and thus we could not search for catalase or peroxidase genes.

Carbon utilization

Based on the genome sequence of T. lignolytica BRL6-1T, we expected that this organism would be able to easily utilize fructose, glucose, mannitol, sorbitol, sucrose, and trehalose, as there are phosphotransferase system (PTS) genes annotated specifically for these carbon sources. Biolog phenotypic arrays were used to test the carbon sources utilized by strain BRL6-1T under anaerobic conditions, using a modified version of DSMZ medium 500 (referred to as mGV medium), in which FeSO4 · 7H2O, Na2S · 9H2O, yeast extract, and the selenite/tungstate solution were omitted. Plates were performed in duplicate, and reactions were only considered positive if the difference between average and standard error was greater than 20 units. Our results indicated that out of the 96 carbon sources tested, strain BRL6-1T was able to utilize 26 under anaerobic conditions (Table 6), included the carbon sources predicted based on the genome sequence. Summarized in Table 7 are carbon sources that are differentially utilized among the three Tolumonas organisms under anaerobic conditions [37, 38].
Table 6

Carbon sources utilized by Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T anaerobically

Carbon source

Omnilog units









D-Gluconic Acid












Tween 20






Tween 40








Tween 80




Table 7

Carbon sources differentially utilized by Tolumonas species anaerobically

Carbon source

T. auensis

T. osonensis

T. lignolytica















We predicted that lactose fermentation would be possible in strain BRL6-1T, as the genome contains four copies of PTS system genes specific to lactose, more than for any other carbon source. T. lignolytica BRL6-1T grows well on aerobic plates of eosin methylene blue agar (EMB) medium, and produces metallic green colonies after 2 days incubation, suggesting aggressive lactose fermentation, a common characteristic of members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Considering that enteric bacteria are common inhabitants of soils [39], it is plausible that this phenotype originated from horizontal gene transfer. The type strains of T. auensis and T. osonensis were able to grow slowly on aerobic EMB plates, but did not produce metallic green colonies. Therefore, EMB plate growth morphology can be used to easily distinguish T. lignolytica BRL6-1T from the other Tolumonas species.

Lignocellulose degradation

The genome of Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T contains four putative peroxidase genes, which may be important in depolymerizing lignin in the environment [40]. The genome also contains homologues to ligD and ligF, genes characterized in Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6 [41] that encode enzymes responsible for the cleavage of β-aryl ether bonds. This type of bond comprises approximately 50 % of the linkages among lignin monomers [9], thus its cleavage is crucial to lignocellulose breakdown. Furthermore, strain BRL6-1T possesses homologues to genes involved in the pathway for transforming ferulic acid, a common lignin breakdown product, into vanillate, then into protocatechuate, and finally to β-ketoadipate (summarized in Table 8) [42, 43].
Table 8

Enzymes involved in lignin degradation with homologues in BRL6-1T genome


Gene name

Characterized in

# of copies in genome

E value

Gene annotation in BRL6-1T genome

Cα-dehydrogenase involved in b-aryl ether cleavage


Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6


6e-12; 4e-10

1)3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase (EC

2)hypothetical protein



Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6



Glutathione S-transferase

Feruloyl-CoA synthetase


Pseudomonas putida strain KT2440



Acyl-CoA synthetases (AMP-forming)/AMP-acid ligases II

Feruloyl-CoA hydratase/lyase


Sphingomonas paucimobilis



1,4-Dihydroxy-2-naphthoyl-CoA synthase (EC

Feruloyl-CoA hydratase/lyase


Sphingomonas paucimobilis



1,4-Dihydroxy-2-naphthoyl-CoA synthase (EC

Vanillin dehydrogenase


Sphingomonas paucimobilis


4e-66; 3e-65; 2e-62; 2e-35; 8e-08

1) succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (EC

2) gamma-glutamyl-gamma-aminobutyraldehyde dehydrogenase

3) NAD-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenases

4) succinylglutamic semialdehyde dehydrogenase (EC

5) acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (EC dehydrogenase AdhE (EC

Vanillate O-demethylase oxidoreductase


Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000


9e-18; 7e-14; 9e-12

1)Hemoglobin-like flavoprotein

2)Flavodoxin reductases (ferredoxin-NADPH reductases) family 1

3)Predicted ferric reductase

3-carboxymuconate cycloisomerase


Pseudomonas putida


9e-13; 5e-09

1)Adenylosuccinate lyase (EC

2)argininosuccinate lyase (EC

4-carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase


Pediococcus acidilactici D3


6e-30; 7e-27; 1e-06

Uncharacterized homolog of gamma-carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase subunit (all 3)

Β-ketoadipate enol-lactone hydrolase


Acinetobacter baumannii strain SDF


5e-15; 5e-13

1)carboxylesterase BioH (pimeloyl-CoA synthesis) (EC

2)Predicted hydrolases or acyltransferases (alpha/beta hydrolase superfamily)

Enzyme protein sequences were obtained from UniProt. E values are based on blastp results performed in img/er against the T. lignolytica BRL6-1T genome

The genome also contains several cytochrome oxidase genes, which may be implicated in utilizing lignin as an electron acceptor for dissimilatory respiration, as was observed for ‘gnolyticus’ SCF1 [40], an organism that was obtained in the same isolation effort as BRL6-1T [44]. Preliminary data supporting this hypothesis can be seen in Fig. 5, which depicts the growth of strain BRL6-1T in a further simplified version of mGV medium (in which resazurin, sodium bicarbonate, and cysteine were also omitted from the recipe), with 0.2 % glucose supplied as a readily oxidized carbon source. The addition of lignin in the media increased both the growth rate and the maximum optical density achieved by strain BRL6-1T. Additionally, a decrease in lignin concentration correlates to exponential growth phase, suggesting that BRL6-1T is using lignin as an additional carbon source, and/or as an electron acceptor, which may enhance the organism’s ability to utilize the more labile glucose as a carbon source.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Growth curve of Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T in mGV medium. Solid lines depict the growth (left axis) of the organism with and without lignin amendment, with error bars showing the standard error of triplicate samples. The dashed line shows lignin concentration (right axis) throughout the growth curve. Lignin concentration was measured by removing 1 ml of culture from anaerobic septum bottles, diluting 1:10 in distilled water, filtering out cells, then measuring the absorbance at 310 nm. These values were compared to a standard curve of known concentrations of lignin in mGV medium measured at this wavelength


Based on biochemical characterization and genome analysis, we formally propose the creation of Tolumonas lignolytica sp. nov., of which BRL6-1T is the type strain. Its 3.6 Mbp genome contains a suite of genes coding proteins involved in the breakdown of lignocellulosic material. These characteristics highlight its applicability to the industrial production of biofuels from plant biomass.

Description of Tolumonas lignolytica sp. nov.

TolumonasL. n. lignum, wood, lignin; Gr. Adj. lytikos, loosening, dissolving; NL fem adj. lignolytia, splitting lignin, referring to the ability to breakdown lignin).

The cells of type strain BRL6-1T are Gram-negative rods that are oxidase and catalase negative. Colonies on 10 % TSA plates are flat white circles with opaque centers and characteristic translucent halos. Growth occurs at 15–37 °C with an optimum at 30 °C. The optimum pH is 7, and cells can tolerate up to 1 % NaCl. Grows well aerobically and anaerobically. The following carbon sources support anaerobic growth: d-trehalose, l-arabinose, d-fructose, d-sorbitol, d-gluconic acid, a-d-glucose, maltotriose, n-acetyl-d-glucosamine, sucrose, d-galactose, Tween 20, maltose, d-mannose, Tween 40, d-melibiose, d-mannitol, d-ribose, Tween 80, l-lyxose.

The G + C content of the genome is 47.56 %. The type strain BRL6-1T (=DSM 100457 =ATCC [in submission]) was isolated from tropical rainforest soil using lignin as the sole carbon source.



Ribosomal Database Project (East Lansing, MI, USA)


Coding sequences


Joint Genome Institute (Walnut Creek, CA, USA)



The work conducted in part by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute and in part by the Joint BioEnergy Institute (, and is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Microbiology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
Microbial Communities Group, Deconstruction Division, Joint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
Department of Microbiology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
Sandia National Lab, Livermore, CA, USA
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA


  1. Wei H, Xu Q, Taylor II LE, Baker JO, Tucker MP, Ding S-Y. Natural paradigms of plant cell wall degradation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20:330–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Freeman C, Ostle N, Kang H. An enzymic “latch” on a global carbon store. Nature. 2001;409:149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Paul EA, Clark FE. Soil microbiology, ecology, and biochemistry. Fort Collins, CO USA: Academic Press; 1996. Google Scholar
  4. Bugg TDH, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Singh R. The emerging role for bacteria in lignin degradation and bio-product formation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22:394–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Masai E, Katayama Y, Fukuda M. Genetic and biochemical investigations on bacterial catabolic pathways for lignin-derived aromatic compounds. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;71:1–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McLeod MP, Warren RL, Hsiao WWL, Araki N, Myhre M, Fernandes C, et al. The complete genome of Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 provides insights into a catabolic powerhouse. PNAS. 2006;103:15582–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. DeRito CM, Pumphrey GM, Madsen EL. Use of field-based stable isotope probing to identify adapted populations and track carbon flow through a phenol-degrading soil microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:7858–65.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Geib SM, Filley TR, Hatcher PG, Hoover K, Carlson JE, Jimenez-Gasco Mdel M, et al. Lignin degradation in wood-feeding insects.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:12932–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bugg TDH, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Rahmanpour R. Pathways for degradation of lignin in bacteria and fungi. Nat Prod Rep. 2011;28:1883–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Parton W et al. Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science. 2007;315:361–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Silver WL, Lugo AE, Keller M. Soil oxygen availability and biogeochemistry along rainfall and topographic gradients in upland wet tropical forest soils. Biogeochemistry. 1999;44:301–28.Google Scholar
  12. de Boer W, Folman LB, Summerbell RC, Boddy L. Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29:795–811.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T. Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: a review in context to second generation of biofuel production. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2012;16:1462–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tschech A, Pfennig N. Growth yield increase linked to caffeate reduction in Acetobacterium woodii. Arch Microbiol. 1984;137:163–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Widdel F, Kohring GW, Mayer F. Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. Arch Microbiol. 1983;134:286–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Janssen PH, Schuhmann A, Morschel E, Rainey FA. Novel anaerobic ultramicrobacteria belonging to the Verrucomicrobiales lineage of bacterial descent isolated by dilution culture from anoxic rice paddy soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:1382.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilson KH, Blitchington RB, Greene RC. Amplification of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA with polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:1942–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:33–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):541–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics. 2004;5:433–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Copeland A, Han J. DUK-A fast and efficient Kmer based sequence matching tool. 2011. Available at: Accessed September 18, 2013.Google Scholar
  22. Gnerre S, MacCallum I, Przybylski D, Ribeiro FJ, Burton JN, Walker BJ, et al. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:1513–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, et al. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Meth. 2010;7:455–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucl Acids Res. 1997;25:0955–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7188–96.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2933–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Markowitz VM, Chen I-MA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, et al. IMG: the Integrated Microbial Genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D115–22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen I-MA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2271–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gao F, Luo H, Zhang CT. DoriC 5.0: an updated database of oriC regions in both bacterial and archaeal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D90–3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang R, Zhang C-T. Multiple replication origins of the archaeon Halobacterium species NRC-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;302:728–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang R, Zhang C-T. Identification of replication origins in archaeal genomes based on the Z-curve method. Archaea. 2005;1:335–46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gao F, Zhang C-T. Ori-Finder: a web-based system for finding oriCs in unannotated bacterial genomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:79.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wattam AR, Abraham D, Dalay O, Disz TL, Driscoll T, Gabbard JL, et al. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucl Acids Res. 2014;42(D1):D581–91. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1099.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fischer-Romero C, Tindall BJ, Jüttner F. Tolumonas auensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a toluene-producing bacterium from anoxic sediments of a freshwater lake. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46:183–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Caldwell ME, Allen TD, Lawson PA, Tanner RS. Tolumonas osonensis sp. nov., isolated from anoxic freshwater sediment, and emended description of the genus Tolumonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61:2659–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Santamaría J, Toranzos GA. Enteric pathogens and soil: a short review. Int Microbiol. 2003;6:5–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. DeAngelis KM, Sharma D, Varney R, Simmons B, Isern NG, Markilllie LM, et al. Evidence supporting dissimilatory and assimilatory lignin degradation in Enterobacter lignolytica SCF1. Front Microbiol. 2013;19;4:280.Google Scholar
  41. Masai E, Katayama Y, Nishikawa S, Fukuda M. Characterization of Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6 genes involved in degradation of lignin-related compounds. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;23:364–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Harwood CS, Parales RE. The β-ketoadipate pathway and the biology of self-identity. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:553–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shi Y, , Chai L, Tang C, Yang Z, Zhang H, Chen R, et al. Characterization and genomic analysis of kraft lignin biodegradation by the beta-proteobacterium Cupriavidus basilensis B-8. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. DeAngelis KM, D'Haeseleer P, Chivian D, Fortney JL, Khudyakov J, Simmons B, et al. Complete genome sequence of ‘Enterobacter lignolytica’ SCF1. Stand Genomic Sci. 2011;5:69.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4576–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Garrity GM, Lilburn TG, Cole JR, Harrison SH, Euzeby J, Tindall BJ. Introduction to the Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea (TOBA) Release 7.7. The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea. 2007;7:1–5.Google Scholar
  47. Garrity G, Bell J, Liburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  48. Garrity G, Bell J, Liburn T. Class III. Gammaproteobacteria class. nov. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  49. Martin-Carnahan A, Joseph SW. Order XII. Aeromonadales ord. nov. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  50. Martin-Carnahan A, Joseph SW. Family I. Aeromonadaceae. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  51. Fischer-Romero C, Tindall BJ. Genus incertae sedis III. Tolumonas. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  52. DeAngelis KM, Silver WL, Thompson AW, Firestone MK. Microbial communities acclimate to recurring changes in soil redox potential status. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:3137–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN, editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic; 1969. p. 21–132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Markowitz VM, Chen IM, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, et al. IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucl Acids Res. 2012;40:D115–22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Billings et al. 2015