- Extended genome report
- Open Access
Genome sequence and description of the anaerobic lignin-degrading bacterium Tolumonas lignolytica sp. nov.
Standards in Genomic Sciencesvolume 10, Article number: 106 (2015)
Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T sp. nov. is the type strain of T. lignolytica sp. nov., a proposed novel species of the Tolumonas genus. This strain was isolated from tropical rainforest soils based on its ability to utilize lignin as a sole carbon source. Cells of Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T are mesophilic, non-spore forming, Gram-negative rods that are oxidase and catalase negative. The genome for this isolate was sequenced and returned in seven unique contigs totaling 3.6Mbp, enabling the characterization of several putative pathways for lignin breakdown. Particularly, we found an extracellular peroxidase involved in lignin depolymerization, as well as several enzymes involved in β-aryl ether bond cleavage, which is the most abundant linkage between lignin monomers. We also found genes for enzymes involved in ferulic acid metabolism, which is a common product of lignin breakdown. By characterizing pathways and enzymes employed in the bacterial breakdown of lignin in anaerobic environments, this work should assist in the efficient engineering of biofuel production from lignocellulosic material.
The exponential increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions following the industrial revolution has drastically affected the climate of Earth, inspiring the need to produce clean, renewable energy with the goal of mitigating the consequences of burning fossil fuels. Second generation biofuels are a promising source of sustainable energy because they are derived from lignocellulose, the most abundant natural polymer on Earth. However, this material is highly recalcitrant due to the occlusion of cellulose by lignin, and the microbial pathways for lignin degradation are not yet well understood.
Lignin is a complex aromatic heteropolymer present in the cell wall of all plants, and comprises 10–30 % of cell wall material . Lignin forms intricate associations with cellulose, the most abundant component within the cell wall, and serves as defense for plants, blocking access of cellulase enzymes to resist microbial breakdown. Consequently, the production of biofuels from plant biomass is physically and chemically hindered by lignin and its links to cellulose . Aerobic lignin degradation has been extensively studied in fungi, suggesting that lignolytic extracellular peroxidase and laccase enzymes play a significant role in the mineralization of lignin in soil [2, 3]. Recent studies focusing on bacterial breakdown and modification of lignin have found that members of the phylogenetic groups Alphaproteobacteria , Gammaproteobacteria , Firmicutes and Actinomycetes are major players in lignin degradation, in both soil and insect guts . Among bacterial lignin or phenol degraders, Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6 produces a β-aryl etherase , and Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 contains a β-ketoadipate pathway ; Kocuria and Staphylococcus also likely degrade aromatic compounds derived from lignocellulose . Although many lignolytic bacteria grow in environments where oxygen is depleted , it has been suggested that they employ oxygen-requiring peroxidases, similar to the ones utilized by fungi .
To address the need for more efficient removal of the lignin portion of lignocellulose to streamline biofuel production, we isolated anaerobic bacteria from tropical rainforest soil in Puerto Rico. Humid tropical forest soils like those from the Long Term Ecological Research Station at the Luquillo Experimental Forest in Puerto Rico have been shown to have among the fastest rates of plant litter decomposition globally , despite their low and fluctuating redox potential . Frequent episodes of anoxia at the Luquillo Forest inhibit fungal growth , suggesting that bacteria are responsible for the observed litter decomposition, and consequently providing an optimal environment for isolating bacteria involved in the anaerobic decomposition of plant litter, including cellulose and lignin compounds. Bacteria are more amenable to genetic modification than fungi and thus are more easily incorporated into biofuel processing technology, for instance through metabolic engineering. Additionally, bacteria capable of metabolizing lignin anaerobically are favorable to industrial biofuel production, considering that current technology relies on anaerobic digestors to process plant waste into biofuels . With this in mind, we isolated and characterized a bacterium capable of anaerobic lignin degradation, Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T sp. nov., and provide a summary of its genome sequence and annotation.
Classification and features
Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T was isolated from soil collected at the Bisley watershed site of the El Yunque National Forest in Puerto Rico, part of the Luquillo Experimental Forest in Luquillo, Puerto Rico, USA (Table 1; Additional file 1). Soils were diluted in water and used to inoculate anaerobic roll tubes containing a modified CCMA media consisting of 2.8 g L−1 NaCl, 0.1 g L−1 KCl, 27 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 1.25 mM NH4Cl, 9.76 g L−1 MES, 1.1 ml L−1 K2HPO4, 12.5 ml L−1 trace minerals [14, 15], and 1 ml L−1 Thauer’s vitamins , with alkali lignin added as the sole source of carbon. Tubes were incubated at ambient temperature for 3 months before colonies were picked and characterized.
Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T cells are Gram-negative, facultative rods capable of growth from 15 to 37 °C and pH 4.5–8.5 (Fig. 1). Colonies on 10 % Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates appear as white, flat circles with opaque centers and translucent halos.
Sanger sequencing was performed on the small subunit ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene using universal primers 27F and 1492R . BLAST analysis shows 97 % identity to the full length 16S rRNA gene of Tolumonas auensis type strain TA 4, indicating BRL6-1T as a potentially novel species of the Tolumonas genus, within the Aeromonadaceae family of the Gammaproteobacteria (Fig. 2a). Since the 16S rRNA gene sequence is not sufficient to clearly define the evolutionary history of this cluster of the Gammaproteobacteria , a hierarchical clustering of whole genomes based on COGS was constructed  (Fig. 2b). This clustering supports the placement of T. lignolytica BRL6-1T as a novel species within the Tolumonas genus.
Genome sequencing information
Genome project history
Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T was selected for sequencing based on its ability to utilize lignin as a sole carbon source. Genome sequencing was performed by the JGI and completed on February 22, 2013 and the genome was presented for public access on IMG M/ER on August 28, 2013. Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance .
Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation
For genomic DNA extraction, strain BRL6-1T was grown overnight in 10 % TSB at 30 °C with shaking at 225 rpm. Genomic DNA for sequencing was obtained following a modified cetyl-trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction protocol established by the DOE Joint Genome Institute. Modifications were as follows: 1) Overnight cultures were resuspended to an OD@600 nm of 0.5, instead of 1.0; 2) Lysozyme incubation was carried out at 37 °C for 30 min; 3) Proteinase K incubation was carried out for 3 h; 4) the concentration of Proteinase K was doubled. The extracted DNA was quantified using the Invitrogen™ Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA Assay Kit and measured using the PicoGreen Fluorescence protocol on the SpectraMax M2 Microplate Reader by Molecular Devices. Genomic DNA samples were verified as strain BRL6-1T via 16S rRNA gene sequencing before being shipped to JGI for genome sequencing.
Genome sequencing and assembly
The draft genome of strain BRL6-1T was generated at the DOE Joint Genome Institute using both Illumina and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) technologies. An Illumina standard shotgun library and long insert mate pair library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform . 64,682,509 reads totaling 9702.4 Mb were generated from the standard shotgun and 45,878,643 reads totaling 4175.0 Mb were generated from the long insert mate pair library. A Pacbio SMRTbell™ library was constructed and sequenced on the PacBio RS platform. 41,131 raw PacBio reads yielded 41,162 adapter-trimmed and quality filtered subreads totaling 118.4 Mb. All raw Illumina sequence data was passed through DUK, a filtering program developed at JGI, which removes known Illumina sequencing and library preparation artifacts . Filtered Illumina and PacBio reads were assembled using AllpathsLG as previously described . The total size of the genome is 3.6 Mb. The final draft assembly contained 9 contigs in 9 scaffolds, and was based on 9669.4 Mb of Illumina Std PE, 4174.1 Mb of Illumina CLIP PE and 118.4 Mb of PacBio post filtered data, which provides an average 3837X Illumina coverage and 32.8X PacBio coverage of the genome, respectively.
Genes were identified using Prodigal , followed by a round of manual curation using GenePRIMP . The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool  was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNA genes were found by searches against models of the ribosomal RNA genes built from SILVA . Other non-coding RNAs such as the RNA components of the protein secretion complex and the RNase P were identified by searching the genome for the corresponding Rfam profiles using INFERNAL . Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform  developed by the Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA .
One chromosomal origin of replication, located at position 1,760,186–1,760,733 bp of contig 1 was identified, suggesting that the genome contains only one chromosome of at least 3.187Mbp (Fig. 3). The location was determined using the Z-curve method [30–32], which utilizes base pair disparities to create a unique three-dimensional graph of the genome using Ori-Finder software . Although nine contigs are presented in the GenBank record (for the genome AZUK00000000.1), contigs 5 and 9 were direct repeats of sequences contained in the other contigs, so we hypothesized that they are repeated scaffolds and excluded them from our analyses (Table 3). Due to remarkably high repeat content at the ends of contigs, we were unable to close the gaps between them using regular sequencing methods. The contigs may be part of the chromosome, but a plasmid extraction indicated the presence of at least one plasmid. A search through the PATRIC database of plasmid sequences shows that contigs 2–8, excluding 5, all have homology to known plasmid sequences, using maximum E-value of 1e−5 . Furthermore, contigs 3,4,7, and 8 have annotated genes commonly found in plasmids, such as toxin-antitoxin sequences, prevent-host-death family sequences, and plasmid maintenance and stabilization protein genes, making them likely candidates.
Of the 3427 predicted genes, 3323 were identified as protein-encoding genes, while 131 RNA genes were found. Of the total protein coding genes identified, 75.02 % were assigned to a putative function. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 3, 4 and 5.
Insights from the genome sequence
Genome to genome comparisons
Once the genome of strain BRL6-1T was sequenced, we were able to compare it to the genome of T. auensis , its closest relative. The two genomes have an average nucleotide identity (ANI) of 84 %, far below the 95 % threshold for species delineation . A tool developed by DSMZ called the genome to genome distance calculator (GGDC) compares genome sequences to databases of DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) data . It estimates the DDH between these two genomes to be 23.10 % +/− 2.37, again far below the species threshold (70 %). The GGDC also uses logistic regression to estimate the probability that DDH > 70 %, i.e. the two genomes belong to the same species. The GGDC calculated a <0.01 % chance that DDH > 70 % between the genomes of strain BRL6-1T and T. auensis . These data support the assertion that strain BRL6-1T is a novel species.
To facilitate physiological comparisons among the species within the Tolumonas genus, T. auensis and T. osonensis were acquired from the DSMZ culture collection in Germany. Oxidase tests confirmed that all three Tolumonas species, including Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T, are negative for oxidation of cytochrome c, as colonies did not change color when applied to BD BBL™ DrySlide™ test strips. However, oxidative enzyme assays show that all three organisms are capable of oxidizing 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-DOPA), a compound that is utilized as a lignin analog (Fig. 4a).
A catalase test was performed on each Tolumonas organism by dropping 3 % hydrogen peroxide on cultures that had incubated at 30 °C for 20 h. T. lignolytica and T. auensis had very weak positive reactions, while T. osonensis exhibited a much stronger phenotype. However, all three organisms showed relatively strong peroxidase enzyme activity (Fig. 4B). A search through the genomes of T. auensis and T. lignolytica shows that both organisms possess just one copy of the same enzyme with putative catalase activity (EC:184.108.40.206), while each genome contains several peroxidase genes. T. osonensis does not have its genome sequenced and thus we could not search for catalase or peroxidase genes.
Based on the genome sequence of T. lignolytica BRL6-1T, we expected that this organism would be able to easily utilize fructose, glucose, mannitol, sorbitol, sucrose, and trehalose, as there are phosphotransferase system (PTS) genes annotated specifically for these carbon sources. Biolog phenotypic arrays were used to test the carbon sources utilized by strain BRL6-1T under anaerobic conditions, using a modified version of DSMZ medium 500 (referred to as mGV medium), in which FeSO4 · 7H2O, Na2S · 9H2O, yeast extract, and the selenite/tungstate solution were omitted. Plates were performed in duplicate, and reactions were only considered positive if the difference between average and standard error was greater than 20 units. Our results indicated that out of the 96 carbon sources tested, strain BRL6-1T was able to utilize 26 under anaerobic conditions (Table 6), included the carbon sources predicted based on the genome sequence. Summarized in Table 7 are carbon sources that are differentially utilized among the three Tolumonas organisms under anaerobic conditions [37, 38].
We predicted that lactose fermentation would be possible in strain BRL6-1T, as the genome contains four copies of PTS system genes specific to lactose, more than for any other carbon source. T. lignolytica BRL6-1T grows well on aerobic plates of eosin methylene blue agar (EMB) medium, and produces metallic green colonies after 2 days incubation, suggesting aggressive lactose fermentation, a common characteristic of members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Considering that enteric bacteria are common inhabitants of soils , it is plausible that this phenotype originated from horizontal gene transfer. The type strains of T. auensis and T. osonensis were able to grow slowly on aerobic EMB plates, but did not produce metallic green colonies. Therefore, EMB plate growth morphology can be used to easily distinguish T. lignolytica BRL6-1T from the other Tolumonas species.
The genome of Tolumonas lignolytica BRL6-1T contains four putative peroxidase genes, which may be important in depolymerizing lignin in the environment . The genome also contains homologues to ligD and ligF, genes characterized in Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6  that encode enzymes responsible for the cleavage of β-aryl ether bonds. This type of bond comprises approximately 50 % of the linkages among lignin monomers , thus its cleavage is crucial to lignocellulose breakdown. Furthermore, strain BRL6-1T possesses homologues to genes involved in the pathway for transforming ferulic acid, a common lignin breakdown product, into vanillate, then into protocatechuate, and finally to β-ketoadipate (summarized in Table 8) [42, 43].
The genome also contains several cytochrome oxidase genes, which may be implicated in utilizing lignin as an electron acceptor for dissimilatory respiration, as was observed for ‘gnolyticus’ SCF1 , an organism that was obtained in the same isolation effort as BRL6-1T . Preliminary data supporting this hypothesis can be seen in Fig. 5, which depicts the growth of strain BRL6-1T in a further simplified version of mGV medium (in which resazurin, sodium bicarbonate, and cysteine were also omitted from the recipe), with 0.2 % glucose supplied as a readily oxidized carbon source. The addition of lignin in the media increased both the growth rate and the maximum optical density achieved by strain BRL6-1T. Additionally, a decrease in lignin concentration correlates to exponential growth phase, suggesting that BRL6-1T is using lignin as an additional carbon source, and/or as an electron acceptor, which may enhance the organism’s ability to utilize the more labile glucose as a carbon source.
Based on biochemical characterization and genome analysis, we formally propose the creation of Tolumonas lignolytica sp. nov., of which BRL6-1T is the type strain. Its 3.6 Mbp genome contains a suite of genes coding proteins involved in the breakdown of lignocellulosic material. These characteristics highlight its applicability to the industrial production of biofuels from plant biomass.
Description of Tolumonas lignolytica sp. nov.
TolumonasL. n. lignum, wood, lignin; Gr. Adj. lytikos, loosening, dissolving; NL fem adj. lignolytia, splitting lignin, referring to the ability to breakdown lignin).
The cells of type strain BRL6-1T are Gram-negative rods that are oxidase and catalase negative. Colonies on 10 % TSA plates are flat white circles with opaque centers and characteristic translucent halos. Growth occurs at 15–37 °C with an optimum at 30 °C. The optimum pH is 7, and cells can tolerate up to 1 % NaCl. Grows well aerobically and anaerobically. The following carbon sources support anaerobic growth: d-trehalose, l-arabinose, d-fructose, d-sorbitol, d-gluconic acid, a-d-glucose, maltotriose, n-acetyl-d-glucosamine, sucrose, d-galactose, Tween 20, maltose, d-mannose, Tween 40, d-melibiose, d-mannitol, d-ribose, Tween 80, l-lyxose.
Ribosomal Database Project (East Lansing, MI, USA)
Joint Genome Institute (Walnut Creek, CA, USA)
Wei H, Xu Q, Taylor II LE, Baker JO, Tucker MP, Ding S-Y. Natural paradigms of plant cell wall degradation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20:330–8.
Freeman C, Ostle N, Kang H. An enzymic “latch” on a global carbon store. Nature. 2001;409:149.
Paul EA, Clark FE. Soil microbiology, ecology, and biochemistry. Fort Collins, CO USA: Academic Press; 1996.
Bugg TDH, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Singh R. The emerging role for bacteria in lignin degradation and bio-product formation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22:394–400.
Masai E, Katayama Y, Fukuda M. Genetic and biochemical investigations on bacterial catabolic pathways for lignin-derived aromatic compounds. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;71:1–15.
McLeod MP, Warren RL, Hsiao WWL, Araki N, Myhre M, Fernandes C, et al. The complete genome of Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 provides insights into a catabolic powerhouse. PNAS. 2006;103:15582–7.
DeRito CM, Pumphrey GM, Madsen EL. Use of field-based stable isotope probing to identify adapted populations and track carbon flow through a phenol-degrading soil microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:7858–65.
Geib SM, Filley TR, Hatcher PG, Hoover K, Carlson JE, Jimenez-Gasco Mdel M, et al. Lignin degradation in wood-feeding insects.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:12932–7.
Bugg TDH, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Rahmanpour R. Pathways for degradation of lignin in bacteria and fungi. Nat Prod Rep. 2011;28:1883–96.
Parton W et al. Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science. 2007;315:361–4.
Silver WL, Lugo AE, Keller M. Soil oxygen availability and biogeochemistry along rainfall and topographic gradients in upland wet tropical forest soils. Biogeochemistry. 1999;44:301–28.
de Boer W, Folman LB, Summerbell RC, Boddy L. Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development⋆. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29:795–811.
Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T. Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: a review in context to second generation of biofuel production. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2012;16:1462–76.
Tschech A, Pfennig N. Growth yield increase linked to caffeate reduction in Acetobacterium woodii. Arch Microbiol. 1984;137:163–7.
Widdel F, Kohring GW, Mayer F. Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. Arch Microbiol. 1983;134:286–94.
Janssen PH, Schuhmann A, Morschel E, Rainey FA. Novel anaerobic ultramicrobacteria belonging to the Verrucomicrobiales lineage of bacterial descent isolated by dilution culture from anoxic rice paddy soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:1382.
Wilson KH, Blitchington RB, Greene RC. Amplification of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA with polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:1942–6.
Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:33–6.
Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):541–7.
Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics. 2004;5:433–8.
Li M, Copeland A, Han J. DUK-A fast and efficient Kmer based sequence matching tool. 2011. Available at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cb5810k.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2013.
Gnerre S, MacCallum I, Przybylski D, Ribeiro FJ, Burton JN, Walker BJ, et al. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:1513–8.
Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119.
Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, et al. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Meth. 2010;7:455–7.
Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucl Acids Res. 1997;25:0955–64.
Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7188–96.
Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2933–5.
Markowitz VM, Chen I-MA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, et al. IMG: the Integrated Microbial Genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D115–22.
Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen I-MA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2271–8.
Gao F, Luo H, Zhang CT. DoriC 5.0: an updated database of oriC regions in both bacterial and archaeal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D90–3.
Zhang R, Zhang C-T. Multiple replication origins of the archaeon Halobacterium species NRC-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;302:728–34.
Zhang R, Zhang C-T. Identification of replication origins in archaeal genomes based on the Z-curve method. Archaea. 2005;1:335–46.
Gao F, Zhang C-T. Ori-Finder: a web-based system for finding oriCs in unannotated bacterial genomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:79.
Wattam AR, Abraham D, Dalay O, Disz TL, Driscoll T, Gabbard JL, et al. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucl Acids Res. 2014;42(D1):D581–91. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1099.
Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91.
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60.
Fischer-Romero C, Tindall BJ, Jüttner F. Tolumonas auensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a toluene-producing bacterium from anoxic sediments of a freshwater lake. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46:183–8.
Caldwell ME, Allen TD, Lawson PA, Tanner RS. Tolumonas osonensis sp. nov., isolated from anoxic freshwater sediment, and emended description of the genus Tolumonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61:2659–63.
Santamaría J, Toranzos GA. Enteric pathogens and soil: a short review. Int Microbiol. 2003;6:5–9.
DeAngelis KM, Sharma D, Varney R, Simmons B, Isern NG, Markilllie LM, et al. Evidence supporting dissimilatory and assimilatory lignin degradation in Enterobacter lignolytica SCF1. Front Microbiol. 2013;19;4:280.
Masai E, Katayama Y, Nishikawa S, Fukuda M. Characterization of Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6 genes involved in degradation of lignin-related compounds. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;23:364–73.
Harwood CS, Parales RE. The β-ketoadipate pathway and the biology of self-identity. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:553–90.
Shi Y, , Chai L, Tang C, Yang Z, Zhang H, Chen R, et al. Characterization and genomic analysis of kraft lignin biodegradation by the beta-proteobacterium Cupriavidus basilensis B-8. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:1.
DeAngelis KM, D'Haeseleer P, Chivian D, Fortney JL, Khudyakov J, Simmons B, et al. Complete genome sequence of ‘Enterobacter lignolytica’ SCF1. Stand Genomic Sci. 2011;5:69.
Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4576–9.
Garrity GM, Lilburn TG, Cole JR, Harrison SH, Euzeby J, Tindall BJ. Introduction to the Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea (TOBA) Release 7.7. The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea. 2007;7:1–5.
Garrity G, Bell J, Liburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.
Garrity G, Bell J, Liburn T. Class III. Gammaproteobacteria class. nov. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.
Martin-Carnahan A, Joseph SW. Order XII. Aeromonadales ord. nov. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.
Martin-Carnahan A, Joseph SW. Family I. Aeromonadaceae. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.
Fischer-Romero C, Tindall BJ. Genus incertae sedis III. Tolumonas. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, second edition, volume 2, part B. New York, NY USA: Springer; 2005.
DeAngelis KM, Silver WL, Thompson AW, Firestone MK. Microbial communities acclimate to recurring changes in soil redox potential status. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:3137–49.
Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–9.
Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–25.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.
Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–91.
Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN, editor. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic; 1969. p. 21–132.
Markowitz VM, Chen IM, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, et al. IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucl Acids Res. 2012;40:D115–22.
The work conducted in part by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute and in part by the Joint BioEnergy Institute (http://www.jbei.org), and is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
The authors declare no competing interests.
AFB and JLF performed the microbiology and molecular biology studies; KFD, LG, NI, KCK, KM, and TW performed the sequencing and annotation; AFB and KMD performed the genomic analysis; AFB, TCH, BAS and KMD wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Associated MIGS record. (DOC 74 kb)