Skip to main content

Complete genome sequence of Arcobacter nitrofigilis type strain (CIT)

Abstract

Arcobacter nitrofigilis (McClung et al. 1983) Vandamme et al. 1991 is the type species of the genus Arcobacter in the family Campylobacteraceae within the Epsilonproteobacteria. The species was first described in 1983 as Campylobacter nitrofigilis [1] after its detection as a free-living, nitrogen-fixing Campylobacter species associated with Spartina alterniflora Loisel roots [2]. It is of phylogenetic interest because of its lifestyle as a symbiotic organism in a marine environment in contrast to many other Arcobacter species which are associated with warm-blooded animals and tend to be pathogenic. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a type stain of the genus Arcobacter. The 3,192,235 bp genome with its 3,154 protein-coding and 70 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Introduction

Strain CIT (= DSM 7299 = ATCC 33309 = CCUG 15893) is the type strain of the species Arcobacter nitrofigilis, which is the type species of the genus Arcobacter [1]. Strain CIT was isolated from roots of Spartina alterniflora Loisel (cordgrass) growing in salty marshes at the East coast of Canada. It was the first description of an organism in this kind of habitat that belonged to the genus Campylobacter, as described based on phenotypic and biochemical traits [2]. The species epithet nitrofigilis means ‘nitrogen-fixing’ and is based on the outstanding characteristic of this species [3]. The new genus Arcobacter, meaning ‘bow-shaped rod’, was introduced in 1991 and its separation from the genus Campylobacter was based on DNA-DNA and DNA-rRNA hybridization [1]. Up to now, the genus Arcobacter comprises nine species, some of which are associated with warm-blooded animals whereas others are found in marine environments.

Within the Campylobacteraceae several whole-genome sequences have already been deciphered: A. butzleri strain RM4018 [4] (non type strain) is the only member of the genus Arcobacter, as well as genomes from seven species of the genus Campylobacter, and Sulfurospirillum deleyianum [5].

Only few additional strains belonging to the species A. nitrofigilis are known in the literature, with F2176 and F2173 [6] being the closest related ones (99% sequence identity). The type strains of the other species of the genus Arcobacter share 93.8-94.6% 16S rRNA sequence identity with strain CIT, whereas the type strains from other genera in the family Campylobacteraceae share less than 89% sequence identity with strain CIT [7]. There are plenty of phylotypes (uncultured bacteria) known from marine environments such as the ridges flanking crustal fluids in oceanic crust (AY704399, clone FD118-51B-02, 98.6%), sea water from Ishigaki port in Japan (AB262370/-71, 96.4%), a mangrove of the Danshui river estuary of northern Taiwan (DQ234254, 95.8%) [8], costal water in the Bohai Bay, China, (FJ155005, 95.8%), in Black Sea shelf sediments in Romania (AJ271655, 95.8%), or from activated sludge in New Zealand (EU104146, 95.8%). Environmental screens and marine metagenome libraries do not contain more than a handful of sequences with >93% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity indicating a sparse representation of closely related strains in the habitats analyzed (status March 2010). Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for A. nitrofigilis strain CIT, together with the description of the complete genome sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT in a 16S rRNA based tree. The four 16S rRNA gene sequences in the genome differ from each other by up to two nucleotides, and differ by up to three nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (L14627) generated from CCUG 15893, which contains nine ambiguous base calls.

Figure 1.
figure1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT relative to the type strains of the other genera within the Epsilonproteobacteria. The tree was inferred from 1,379 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [11,12] and rooted (as far as possible) in accordance with the current taxonomy [13]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 200 bootstrap replicates [14] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [15] are shown in blue, published genomes [16] in bold, e.g. the recently published GEBA genome from S. deleyianum [5].

A. nitrofigilis cells are Gram-negative, bow-shaped or curved rods of 1–3 µm length and 0.2–0.9 µm width (Figure 2 and Table 1). Motility is based on a single, polar flagellum and results in rapid corkscrew motion. Older cultures also show coccoid cells [2]. The habitat of all known A. nitrofigilis isolates is either the roots or the sediment around the roots of S. alterniflora Loisel growing in salt marshes [3]. Although no pathogenic association has been described so far, A. nitrofigilis was among five Arcobacter species that were isolated from food samples such as meat and shellfish varieties [27]. The optimum growth temperature of A. nitrofigilis is 30°C, the temperature range is from 10–37°C [28]. Neither spores nor granules are present but a brown pigment is formed from tryptophan [2]. All strains of the species show positive reactions for nitrogenase, catalase and oxidase. Growth occurs under microaerophilic conditions with oxygen as terminal electron acceptor, under anaerobic conditions fumarate or aspartate are necessary, the presence of nitrate is detrimental [2]. Hydrogen is not necessary for growth [1]. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite and sulfide is produced from cysteine [3]. Strain CIT tested positive for urease, other strains of the species do not [3]. The metabolism of A. nitrofigilis is chemoorganotrophic; organic acids and amino acids are used as carbon sources but carbohydrates are neither oxidized nor fermented [2]. All strains of the species are halotolerant. They require a minimum of 0.5% NaCl for growth and can tolerate up to 7% NaCl [28]. A. nitrofigilis is susceptible to cephalothin and nalidixic acid but isresistant to vancomycin [3]. The G+C content of the DNA was determined by thermal denaturation to be 28.0% [3] which is slightly below the 28.4% found in the genome.

Figure 2.
figure2

Scanning electron micrograph of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT

Table 1. Classification and general features of A. nitrofigilis strain CIT according to the MIGS recommendations [17]

Genome sequencing and annotation information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [29], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [30]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [15] and the complete genome sequence in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Genome sequencing project information

Chemotaxonomy

The major respiratory quinones are menaquinone 6 and a second atypical menaquinone 6 that has not yet been clearly identified [1]. The major fatty acids in whole cells of A. nitrofigilis are hexadecenoic (C16:0), cis-9-hexadecenoic (cis-C16:1ϖ7c) and cis-9-octadecenoic acid (cis-C18:1ϖ7c) [24]

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

A. nitrofigilis strain CIT, DSM 7299, was grown on DSMZ medium 429 (Columbia agar including 5% horse blood) [31] at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 1–1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with lysis modification st/LALMP according to Wu et al. [30].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 technologies. An Illumina GAii shotgun library with reads of 50 Mb, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 243 bases, and a paired end 454 library with average insert size of 24 kb were generated for this genome. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/. Draft assembly was based on 138 Mb 454 standard and 454 paired end data (498,215 reads). Newbler (Roch, version 2.0.0-PostRelease-10/28/2008) parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The initial Newbler assembly contained 42 contigs in 3 scaffolds. It was converted into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus and collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with Velvet [32], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (www.phrap.com) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the following finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/), Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing [33]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J-F.Cheng, unpublished). A total of 480 additional Sanger reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher). The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [34] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [35]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [36].

Genome properties

The genome is 3,192,235 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with an overall G+C content of 28.4% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,224 genes predicted, 3,154 were protein-coding genes, and 70 RNAs; 28 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (72.1%) were assigned a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Figure 3.
figure3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3. Genome Statistics
Table 4. Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

References

  1. 1.

    Vandamme P, Falsen E, Rossau R, Hoste B, Segers P, Tytgat RDE, Ley J. Revision of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Wolinella taxonomy: emendation of generic descriptions and proposal of Arcobacter gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:88–103. PubMed doi:10.1099/00207713-41-1-88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McClung CR, Patriquin DG. Isolation of a nitrogen-fixing Campylobacter species from the roots of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Can J Microbiol 1980; 26:881–886. PubMed doi:10.1139/m80-153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McClung CR, Patriquin DG, Davis RE. Campylobacter nitrofigilis sp. nov. a nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with roots of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983; 33:605–612. doi:10.1099/00207713-33-3-605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Miller WG, Parker CT, Rubenfeld M, Mendz GL, Wösten MMS, Ussery DW, Stolz JF, Binnewies TT, Hallin PF, Wang G, et al. The complete genome sequence and analysis of the Epsilonproteobacterium Arcobacter butzleri. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:e1358. PubMed doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001358

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sikorski J, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Lucas S, Chen F, Tice H, Cheng JF, Saunders E, et al. Complete genome of Sulfurospirillum deleyianum type strain (5175T). Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:149–157. doi:10.4056/sigs.67

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Figueras MJ, Collado L, Guarro J. A new 16S rRNA-RFLP method for the discrimination of the accepted species of Arcobacter. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 62:11–15. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.09.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK, Lim YW. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2259–2261. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Liao PC, Huang BH, Huang S. Microbial community composition of the Danshui river estuary of northern Taiwan and the practicality of the phylogenetic method in microbial barcoding. Microb Ecol 2007; 54:497–507. PubMed doi:10.1007/s00248-007-9217-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540–552. PubMed

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452–464. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758–771. PubMed doi:10.1080/10635150802429642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376. PubMed doi:10.1007/BF01734359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby JP, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO, Rossello-Mora R. The All-Species Living Tree project: A 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 2008; 31:241–250. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2008.07.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How Many Bootstrap Replicates Are Necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5541:184–200. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02008-713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:D346–D354. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkp848

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baar C, Eppinger M, Raddatz G, Simon J, Lanz C, Klimmek O, Nandakumar R, Gross R, Rosinus A, Keller H, et al. Complete genome sequence and analysis of Wolinella succinogenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:11690–11695. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.1932838100

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thompson N, Allen MJ, Anguiuoli SV, et al. Towards a richer description of our complete collection of genomes and metagenomes: the “Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence” (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt1360

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In:Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119–169.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Validation List No. 107. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1–6. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64188-0

  21. 21.

    Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class V. Epsilon-proteobacteria class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1145.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order I. Campylo-bacterales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1145.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Vandamme P, De Ley J. Proposal for a new family, Campylobacteraceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:451–455. doi:10.1099/00207713-41-3-451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Donachie SP, Bowman JP, On SL, Alam M. Arcobacter halophilus sp. nov., the first obligate halophile in the genus Arcobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1271–1277. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63581-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Classification of Bacteria and Archaea in risk groups. www.baua.de TRBA 466.

  26. 26.

    Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed doi:10.1038/75556

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Collado L, Guarro J, Figueras MJ. Prevalence of Arcobacter in meat and shellfish. J Food Prot 2009; 72:1102–1106. PubMed

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tenover FC, Fennell CL. The genera Campylobacter and Helicobacter. In: The Prokaryotes. Vol. IV, 2nd ed. 1992, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Klenk HP, Göker M. En route to a genome-based taxonomy of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol 2010; 33:175–182. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2010.03.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova N, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462:1056–1060. PubMed doi:10.1038/nature08656

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    List of growth media used at DSMZ: http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php

  32. 32.

    Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 2008; 18:821–829. PubMed doi:10.1101/gr.074492.107

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sims D, Brettin T, Detter JC, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F, Lucas S, et al. Complete genome of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T). Stand Genomic Sci 2009; 1:12–20. doi:10.4056/sigs.761

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-119

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A Gene Prediction Improvement Pipeline for microbial genomes. Nat Methods 2010; 7:455–457. PubMed doi:10.1038/nmeth.1457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271–2278. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Sabine Welnitz for growing the A. nitrofigilis cells, and Susanne Schneider for DNA extraction and quality analysis (both at DSMZ). This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, and UT-Battelle Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-2.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikos C. Kyrpides.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pati, A., Gronow, S., Lapidus, A. et al. Complete genome sequence of Arcobacter nitrofigilis type strain (CIT). Stand in Genomic Sci 2, 300–308 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.912121

Download citation

Keywords

  • symbiotic
  • Spartina alterniflora Loisel
  • nitrogen fixation
  • micro-anaerophilic
  • motile
  • Campylobacteraceae
  • GEBA