Skip to main content

Advertisement

Non-contiguous finished genome sequence of Staphylococcus capitis CR01 (pulsetype NRCS-A)

Article metrics

  • 621 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

Staphylococcus capitis is a coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) commonly found in the human microflora. Recently, a clonal population of Staphylococcus capitis (denominated NRCS-A) was found to be a major cause of late-onset sepsis (LOS) in several neonatal intensive care units in France. Here, we report the complete genome sequence and annotation of the prototype Staphylococcus capitis NCRS-A strain CR01. The 2,504,472 bp long genome (1 chromosome and no plasmids) exhibits a G+C content of 32.81%, and contains 2,468 protein-coding and 59 tRNA genes and 4 rRNA genes.

Introduction

A frequent cause of low-weight newborns mortality and morbidity in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) are late-onset sepsis (LOS), that are defined as sepsis occurring after 3 days of age. The most frequently encountered pathogens are coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and within those Staphylococcus epidermidis has been shown to be the most prevalent [1,2]. However, a few studies have reported the emergence of Staphylococcus capitis as a main CoNS- and LOS-causative pathogen in NICU settings [24]. A study in French NICUs [2] has demonstrated the spread of a single clonal population of methicillin-resistant S. capitis (pulsotype NRCS-A) associated to reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, the first line of antibiotics used in cases of LOS. Moreover, this clone has also been recently identified in NICUs in Belgium, United Kingdom and Australia, which suggests a worldwide distribution. In contrast, in adult bacteremia, S. capitis are rarely found and when detected, it presents a bigger diversity in terms of genotypes as well as antimicrobial susceptibility profiles than neonates bacteremia.

In order to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind the wide spreading of the S. capitis NRCS-A clone in NICUs throughout the world, we sequenced a prototype strain (CR01).

Classification and information

A strain belonging to the clonal population of Staphylococcus capitis NCRS-A pulsetype (Table 1) was isolated from the blood culture of a preterm infant with LOS, hospitalized in the NICU of the Northern Hospital Group Center (Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France) and suffering of LOS.

Table 1. Classification and general features of Staphylococcus capitis strain CR01, pulsetype-NRCS-A according the MIGS recommendation [5].

Species identification of the bacterial isolates and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) were performed, respectively, using Vitek MS (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile), 16S rDNA sequencing, the automated BD Phoenix system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) and with Shimadzu-MALDI-TOF MS system (Shimadzu Corporation), as implemented on [21].

The strain was identified as being a Staphylococcus capitis by VITEK MS with 99.9% and at 93.7% by the MALDI-TOF MS, using the Shimadzu Launchpad software program and the SARAMIS database application (AnagnosTec GmbH) for automatic measurement and identification (Figure 1). Based on the information provided by the manufacture, when the score is ≥70%, identification is considered of high confidence.

Figure 1.
figure1

Reference mass spectrum from Staphylococcus capitis strain (CR01).

The antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results were analyzed according to the recommendations of the French Microbiology Society [22]. The S. capitis bacteremia was considered positive based on a single positive blood culture [2,23]. The S. capitis NCRS-A isolate CR01, as all isolates from this clone, is resistant to penicillin, methicillin, gentamicin, rifampicin, hetero-resistant to vancomycin and sensitive to fusidic acid and fluoroquinolones.

Table 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 show detailed information concerning general features of Staphylococcus capitis strain (CR01) and position within the genus Staphylococcus.

Figure 2.
figure2

Transmission electron microscopy of Staphylococcus capitis strain (CR01) using a JEOL 1400. The scale bar represents 200 nm.

Figure 3.
figure3

16S rRNA Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Staphylococcus capitis strain CR01 (indicated by the yellow circle) relative to other type strains within the genus Staphylococcus. All 16S rRNA sequences were obtained from the RDP database using as filtering criteria: sequences with more than 1200 nt and classified as “good” quality sequences. The tree uses sequences aligned with the MUSCLE software, with the default parameters as implemented on Seaview version 4 [24], and a tree was inferred based on 1285 sites using the distance model of observed divergence, as implemented in the BioNJ algorithm.

The 16S rRNA sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE software, with the default parameters as implemented on Seaview version 4 [24], and a tree was inferred based on 1285 sites using the distance model of observed divergence, as implemented in the BioNJ algorithm, and a bootstrapping process repeated 500 times.

The final tree was rooted using the 16S rRNA sequence of Macrococcus equipercicus Type strain that belongs to a closely-related sister genus.

Genome sequencing information

The genome sequence of S. capitis strain CR01 was determined by high-throughput sequencing performed on a Genome Sequencer FLX + system (454 Life Sciences/Roche) using FLX Titanium reagents according to the manufacturer’s protocols and instructions, with approximately 47-fold coverage of the genome. This platform provides longer read lengths than other sequencing platforms to obtain raw sequences. De novo assemblies were performed using the Roche Newbler (v 2.7) software package.

Genome project history

Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [5].

Table 2. Project information

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

The sample was prepared for sequencing by growing S. capitis CR01, aerobically at 37°C in Blood Agar for 24–48 hours. Genomic DNA was extracted using the PureLinkTM genomic DNA kit (InvitrogenTM) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The quantity of DNA obtained was determined using a NanoVue TM Plus (HVD Life Sciences), and 1 µg of DNA was used for sequencing of whole-genome of this strain.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The isolated DNA of S. capitis CR01, was used to create 454-shotgun libraries following the GS Rapid library protocol (Roche 454, Roche). The resulting 454 DNA libraries were sequenced using a whole-genome shotgun strategy by GS FLX Titanium sequencing kit XL+ [25] (202,108 reads totaling 2.5 Mb, X48 fold coverage of the genome). Genome sequences were processed by Roche’s sequencing software according to the manufacturer’s instructions (454 Life Science). The resulting shotgun reads were assembled de novo using the Roche Newbler assembly software 2.7 (454 Life Science) and 26 large contigs (Contig00001 to Contig00026) were obtained. The N50 was 176239 bp.

Genome annotation

An automatic syntactic and functional annotation of the draft genome was performed using the MicroScope platform pipeline [26,27]. The syntactic analysis combines a set of programs including AMIGene [28], tRNAscan-SE [29], RNAmmer [30], Rfam scan [31] and Prodigal software [32] to predict genomic objects that are mainly CDSs and RNA genes. More than 20 bioinformatics methods are then used for functional and relational analyses: homology search in the generalist databank UniProt [33] and in more specialized databases as COG [34], InterPro [35], PRIAM profiles for enzymatic classification [36], prediction of protein localization using TMHMM [37], SignalP [38] and PsortB [39] tools.

Genome properties

The genome includes one circular chromosome of 2,504,472 bp (32.81% GC content). A total of 2,565 genes were predicted with 2,453 being protein-coding genes, 59 tRNA-enconding genes, 4 rRNA-encoding genes (including 2 copies of 5S rRNA, 1 copy of both the large and the small-subunits, respectively, 23S and 16S rRNA) and 34 other RNA related ORFs. No plasmid was detected.

Of the 2,453 protein-coding genes, 1,892 genes (76.7%) were assigned to a putative function with the remaining annotated as hypothetical proteins. The predicted coding density in S. capitis strain CR01 was 86%.

Table 3 and 4 and Figure 4 detailed description of the properties and the statistics of Staphylococcus capitis strain CR01 genome. The distribution of the genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Figure 4.
figure4

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on the forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on the reverse strand colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs blue), GC content, and GC skew

Table 3. Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome
Table 4. Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories.

Conclusion

Here, we described a new genome sequence of Staphylococcus capitis (strain CR01 belonging to NRCS-A clone) as a first step toward comparing its content with other sequenced Staphylococcus capitis genomes as well as CoNS genomes of species associated with late-onset sepsis. Detailed analyses are in progress to identify virulence factors and mobile genetic elements (MBE), such as the staphylococcal chromosome cassette (SCCmec) [18], potentially related to the high specificity of the NRCS-A clone to the NICU environment.

Abbreviations

EMBL:

European Molecular Biology Laboratory

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information (Bethesda, MD, USA)

RDP:

Ribosomal Database Project (East Lansing, MI, USA)

References

  1. 1.

    Klingenberg C, Rønnestad A, Anderson AS, Abrahamsen TG, Zorman J, Villaruz A, Flægstad T, Otto M. Sollid, Ericson J. Persistent strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci in a neonatal intensive care unit: virulence factors and invasiveness. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007; 13:1100–1111. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01818.x

  2. 2.

    Rasigade JP, Raulin O, Picaud JC, Tellini C, Bes M, Grando J, Ben Saïd M, Claris O, Etienne J, Tigaud S, Laurent F. Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus capitis with Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility Causes Late-Onset Sepsis in Intensive Care Neonates. PLoS ONE 2012; 7:e31548. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031548

  3. 3.

    Ng PC, Chow VC, Lee CH, Ling JM, Wong HL, Chang RCY. Persistent Staphylococcus capitis septicemia in a preterm infant. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006; 25:652–654. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000225785.32137.d3

  4. 4.

    de Silva GDI, Kantzanou M, Justice A, Massey RC, Wilkinson AR, Day NPJ, Peacock SJ. The ica Operon and Biofilm Production in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Associated with Carriage and Disease in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:382–388. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.02.382-388.2002

  5. 5.

    Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360

  6. 6.

    Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576

  7. 7.

    Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals Concerning the Higher Taxa of Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:1–6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-28-1-1.

  8. 8.

    Murray RGE. The Higher Taxa, or, a Place for Everything…? In: Holt JG (ed), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First Edition, Volume 1, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1984, p. 31–34.

  9. 9.

    List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. List no. 132. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0

  10. 10.

    Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. Class I. Bacilli class nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 19–20.

  11. 11.

    Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225

  12. 12.

    Prévot AR. In: Hauderoy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou. J., Prévot AR, Rosset D, Urbain A (eds), Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes, Second Edition, Masson et Cie, Paris, 1953, p. 1–692.

  13. 13.

    List Editor. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. List no. 132. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0

  14. 14.

    Schleifer KH, Bell JA. Family VIII. Staphylococcaceae fam. nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 392.

  15. 15.

    Rosenbach FJ. In: Bergmann JF (ed), Microorganismen bei den Wund-Infections-Krankheiten des Menschen., Wiesbaden, 1884, p. 1–122.

  16. 16.

    Judicial Commission. Opinion 17. Conservation of the Generic name Staphylococcus Rosenbach, Designation of Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach as the Nomenclatural Type of the Genus Staphylococcus Rosenbach, and Designation of the Neotype culture of Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon 1958; 8:153–154.

  17. 17.

    Kloos WE, Musselwhite MS. Distribution and Persistence of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus Species and Other Aerobic Bacteria on Human Skin. Appl Microbiol 1975; 30:381–385. PubMed

  18. 18.

    Martins Simões P, Rasigade JP, Lemriss H, Butin M, Ginevra C, Lemriss S, Goering RV, Ibrahimi A, Picaud JC, Vandenesch FEL, et al. Characterization of a novel staphylococcal chromosome cassette (SCCmec) within a composite SCC island in neonatal sepsis-associated Staphylococcus capitis pulsotype NRCS-A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57:6354. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01576-13

  19. 19.

    Schleifer KH, Bell JA. Family VIII. Staphylococcaceae fam. nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 392.

  20. 20.

    Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556

  21. 21.

    Cherkaoui A, Hibbs J, Emonet S, Tangomo M, Girard M, Francois P, Schrenzel J. Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48:1169–1175. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01881-09

  22. 22.

    French Society for Microbiology. Recommandations du Comite de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie. 2009. Available at: http://www.sfmasofr/doc/downloadphp?doc=DiU8C&fic=casfm_2009pdf. Accessed 22 February 2009.

  23. 23.

    Hall KK, Lyman JA. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006; 19:788–802. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00062-05

  24. 24.

    Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView Version 4: A Multiplatform Graphical User Interface for Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Tree Building. Mol Biol Evol 2010; 27:221–224. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp259

  25. 25.

    Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O, Clayton RA, Kirkness EF, Kerlavage AR, Bult CJ, Tomb JF, Dougherty BA, Merrick JM, et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 1995; 269:496–512. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7542800

  26. 26.

    Vallenet D, Belda E, Calteau A, Cruveiller S, Engelen S, Lajus A, Le Fèvre F, Longin C, Mornico D, Roche D, et al. MicroScope—an integrated microbial resource for the curation and comparative analysis of genomic and metabolic data. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:D636–D647. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1194

  27. 27.

    Vallenet D, Labarre L, Rouy Z, Barbe V, Bocs S, Cruveiller S, Lajus A, Pascal G, Scarpelli C, Médigue C. MaGe: a microbial genome annotation system supported by synteny results. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:53–65. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj406

  28. 28.

    Bocs S, Cruveiller S, Vallenet D, Nuel G, Médigue C. AMIGene: Annotation of MIcrobial Genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:3723–3726. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg590

  29. 29.

    Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.5.0955

  30. 30.

    Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160

  31. 31.

    Gardner PP, Daub J, Tate JG, Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Lindgreen S, Wilkinson AC, Finn RD, Griffiths-Jones S, Eddy SR, Bateman A. Rfam: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:D136–D140. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn766

  32. 32.

    Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-119

  33. 33.

    UnitProt Consortium. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) 2009. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:D169–D174. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn664

  34. 34.

    Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 2003; 4:41. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-41

  35. 35.

    Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bork P, Das U, Daugherty L, Duquenne L, et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:D211–D215. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn785

  36. 36.

    Claudel-Renard C, Chevalet C, Faraut T, Kahn D. Enzyme-specific profiles for genome annotation: PRIAM. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:6633–6639. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg847

  37. 37.

    Sonnhammer EL, von Heijne G, Krogh A. A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 1998; 6:175–182. PubMed

  38. 38.

    Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol 2004; 340:783–795. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028

  39. 39.

    Gardy JL, Laird MR, Chen F, Rey S, Walsh CJ, Ester M, Brinkman FS. PSORTb v.2.0: expanded prediction of bacterial protein subcellular localization and insights gained from comparative proteome analysis. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:617–623. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti057

  40. 40.

    Moller S, Croning MDR, Apweiler R. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics 2001; 17:646–653. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.7.646

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM, grant ING20111223510) and by the Institut National de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) and the French Ministry of Health.

Author information

Correspondence to F. Laurent.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Staphylococcus capitis (NCRS-A)
  • draft-genome
  • methicillin resistance
  • late-onset sepsis