Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus algeriensis sp. nov.

Esma Bendjama; Lotfi Loucif; Seydina M. Diene; Caroline Michelle; Djamila Gacemi-Kirane; Jean-Marc Rolain

doi:10.4056/sigs.5459590

Open Access

Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus algeriensis sp. nov.

Esma Bendjama^{1, 2, 3},
Lotfi Loucif^{1, 2, 3},
Seydina M. Diene¹,
Caroline Michelle¹,
Djamila Gacemi-Kirane² and
Jean-Marc Rolain¹Email author

Standards in Genomic Sciences20149:9031046

https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.5459590

Published: 15 June 2014

Abstract

Strain EB01^T sp. nov. is the type strain of Bacillus algeriensis, a new species within the genus Bacillus. This strain, whose genome is described here, was isolated from sediment sample of the hypersaline lake Ezzemoul sabkha in northeastern Algeria. B. algeriensis is a facultative anaerobic Gram-positive bacillus. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 5,269,577 bp long genome contains 5,098 protein-coding and 95 RNA genes, including 12 rRNA genes.

Keywords

Bacillus algeriensis
hypersaline environments
sediments
genome
taxono-genomics

Introduction

Bacillus massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. strain EB01^T (= CSUR P857 = DSM 27334) is the type strain of B. massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. It is a new Gram-positive, facultatively anaerobic, motile, indole-negative, rod shaped bacterium with rounded ends. It was isolated from a sediment sample from the hypersaline lake Ezzemoul sabkha in the Oum-El-Bouaghi region in northeastern Algeria, which is an important wintering and resting site for several species of waterbirds, including the Greater Flamingo. This site is one of the Ramsar convention wetlands (http://www.ramsar.org). The genus Bacillus was created by Cohn about 142 years ago [1], and mainly comprises Gram-positive, rod-shaped, aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, spore-forming bacteria. The genus includes 279 species and 7 subspecies with validly published names [2]. Members of Bacillus genus are ubiquitous in nature, ranging from freshwater to marine sediments and from hot springs and desert sands to Arctic soils; many strains have been isolated from the gastrointestinal tracts of various insects and animals, from vegetation and from food [3]. Bacillus strains are biotechnologically priceless because of their high capacity to produce a wide range of antimicrobial compounds, enzymes and other metabolites that can be used in industry [4,5]. Some species of Bacillus are pathogenic, such as B. anthracis (responsible for causing anthrax) [6] and B. cereus (a major cause of food poisoning) [7]. Others are opportunists in immunocompromised patients, and may also be involved in various human infections, including pneumonia, endocarditis, ocular, cutaneous, bone or central nervous system infections and bacteremia [8].The current bacterial taxonomy is based on a combination of various phenotypic and genetic criteria [9,10]. However, the three essential genetic criteria that are used, comprising 16S rRNA gene based phylogeny [11], G+C content, and DNA-DNA hybridization [10,12] exhibit several drawbacks. As a result of the recent decrease in the cost of genomic sequencing, it has been proposed that whole genome sequencing information and MALDI-TOF spectrum [13] be combined with the main phenotypic characteristics as a polyphasic approach strategy (taxono-genomics) to describe new bacterial taxa [14–26].

Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for B. massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. strain EB01^T together with the description of the complete genome sequence and annotation. These characteristics support the circumscription of the species B. massilioalgeriensis.

Classification and features

In July 2012, a sediment sample was aseptically collected in sterile bottles, 15 cm below the evaporite crust of the hypersaline lake Ezzemoul sabkha of Oum-El-Bouaghi region in northeastern Algeria. Samples were transferred in a cooler (4°C) to our lab in Algeria. Samples were processed the same day. Sediments were diluted 1:10 v/v with sterile saline water (0.9% NaCl) and vigorously shaken, Tenfold serial dilutions (10⁻¹–10⁻⁵) of the sediment suspension were plated in Nutrient Agar (NA) medium (meat extract 1 g/l, peptone 5 g/l, yeast extract 2 g/l, sodium chloride 5 g/l, agar 15 g/l) and the plates were incubated at 30°C for 24–72 h. In order to obtain a pure culture, colonies were transferred to fresh NA medium. Bacillus massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. strain EB01^T (Table 1) was isolated in July 2012 by cultivation under aerobic conditions at 30°C. This strain exhibited a 97.0% 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence similarity with Bacillus subterraneus type strain DSM13966^T (Figure 1), the phylogenetically closest validly published Bacillus species. These values were lower than the 98.7% 16S rRNA gene sequence threshold recommended by Stackebrandt and Ebers to delineate a new species without carrying DNA DNA hybridizidation [11].

Figure 1.
A consensus phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons, highlighting the position of strain EB01^T *Bacillus massilioalgeriensis* relative to other type strains within the *Bacillus* genus. GenBank accession numbers are displayed in parentheses. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW, and phylogenetic inferences made using the neighbor-joining method [38] within the MEGA 5 software [39]. Numbers above the nodes are percentages of bootstrap values from 1,000 replicates that support the node. *Paenibacillus polymyxa* was used as the outgroup. The scale bar represents 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Table 1.

Classification and general features of Bacillus massilioalgeriensis strain EB01^T

MIGS ID	Property	Term	Evidence code^a
	Current classification	Domain Bacteria	TAS [27]
		Phylum Firmicutes	TAS [28–30]
		Class Bacilli	TAS [31,32]
		Order Bacillales	TAS [33,34]
		Family Bacillaceae	TAS [33,35]
		Genus Bacillus	TAS [1,33,36]
		Species Bacillus massilioalgeriensis	IDA
		Type strain EB01^T	IDA
	Gram stain	Positive	IDA
	Cell shape	Rod-shaped	IDA
	Motility	Motile	IDA
	Sporulation	Sporulating	IDA
	Temperature range	Between 37°C and 55°C	IDA
	Optimum temperature	37°C	IDA
MIGS-6.3	Salinity	Growth in LB medium + 0–2.5% NaCl	IDA
MIGS-22	Oxygen requirement	Facultative anaerobic	IDA
	Carbon source	Unknown	NAS
	Energy source	Unknown	NAS
MIGS-6	Habitat	Hypersaline sediment sample	IDA
MIGS-15	Biotic relationship	Free living	IDA
	Pathogenicity	Unknown	NAS
	Biosafety level	2	NAS
MIGS-14	Isolation	Sediment of Ezzemoul Sabkha Lake	IDA
MIGS-4	Geographic location	Algeria	IDA
	Sample collection	July 2012
MIGS-5	time
MIGS-4.1	Latitude	35.88167	IDA
MIGS-4.1	Longitude	6.503272	IDA
MIGS-4.3	Depth	Unknown	NAS
MIGS-4.4	Altitude	800 m	IDA

^aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS: Non traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [37]. If the evidence is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Six different growth temperatures (25, 30, 37, 45, 50 and 55°C), nine NaCl concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30%) and ten pHs (5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 10, 11) were tested. Growth occurred at all tested temperatures, however the optimal growth was observed at 37°C, between 0% and 2.5% NaCl concentration and pH in the range of 6.5–9 (optimum at pH 7). Colony morphology was observed on sheep blood agar (BioMerieux) after 24 h of aerobic incubation under optimal growth conditions, the colonies of strain EB01^T were circular, light yellow, smooth and 2 mm in diameter. Growth of the strain was tested in anaerobic and microaerophilic atmospheres using GasPak EZ Anaerobe Pouch (Becton, Dickinson and Company) and CampyGen Compact (Oxoid) systems, respectively, and in aerobic atmosphere, with or without 5% CO₂. Growth was achieved under aerobic (with and without CO2) and microaerophilic conditions but weak growth was observed under anaerobic conditions. Gram staining showed Gram-positive rods (Figure 2). Cells grown on agar sporulate. A motility test was positive. The size of cells were determined by negative staining transmission electron microscopy on a Technai G² Cryo (FEI) at an operating voltage of 200 kV, the rods have a length ranging from 2.4 µm to 4.9 µm (mean 3.6 µm) and a diameter ranging from 0.7 µm to 1.1 µm (mean 0.8 µm) (Figure 3).

Figure 2.
Gram stain of *B. massilioalgeriensis* strain EB01^T.

Figure 3.
Transmission electron micrograph of *B. massilioalgeriensis* strain EB01^T made using a Technai G² Cryo (FEI) at an operating voltage of 200 kV. The scale bar represents 500 nm.

Strain EB01^T exhibited catalase activity but oxidase activity was negative. Using the commercially available API 50CH system (BioMerieux) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, a weak positive reaction was observed for D-ribose, D-glucose, D-fructose, methyl α-D-glucopyranoside, N-acetylglucosamine, D-maltose, D-lactose, D-melibiose, D-saccharose, D-trehalose, D-tagatose, and hydrolysis of starch. Other tests were negative. Using the API ZYM system (BioMerieux), positive reactions were observed for alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, N-acetyl-glucosaminidase and a weak positive reaction was observed for acid phosphatase. The nitrate reduction and β-galactosidase reaction was also positive, but urease and indole production were negative. B. massilioalgeriensis was susceptible to amoxicillin, nitrofurantoin, erythromycin, doxycycline, rifampicin, vancomycin, gentamicin, imipenem, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, but resistant to nalidixic acid.

When compared to other Bacillus species [40–48], Bacillus massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. strain EB01^T exhibited the phenotypic differences detailed in (Table 2).

Table 2.

Differential phenotypic characteristics between B. massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. strain EB01^T and phylogenetically close Bacillus species^†.

Characteristic	B. ma	B. su	B. fo	B. je	B. th	B. bo	B. ba	B. ne	B. kr
Cell-diameter(µm)	0.7–1.1	0.5–0.8	1	0.8–1.1	0.5–0.7	0.5–0.9	0.7–1.2	1	1.4–2.0
Oxygen requirement	facultative anaerobic	facultative anaerobic	aerobic	facultative anaerobic	aerobic	na	facultative anaerobic	facultative anaerobic	aerobic
Gram strain	+	−	+	V	V	+	+ or V	+	+
NaCl range (%,w/v)	0–2.5	0–9	0–3	0–13	0–5	0–7	na	0–8	0–6
Motility	+	+	na	+	+	+	+	+	+
Endospore formation	+	−	−	+	+	+	+	+	+
Production of
Alkaline phosphatase	+	na	na	na	na	+	na	na	na
Acid phosphatase	w	na	na	na	na	na	na	na	na
Catalase	+	+	+	+	+	+	na	+	+
Oxidase	−	−	+	−	−	+	na	na	−
Nitrate reductase	+	+	+	+	+	−	+	−	−
Urease	−	−	+	+	−	−	−	−	−
α-galactosidase	−	na	na	na	na	na	na	na	na
β-galactosidase	−	−	+	na	na	−	na	+	na
β-glucuronidase	+	na	na	na	na	na	na	na	+
N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase	+	na	na	na	na	na	na	na	na
Indole	−	−	na	−	−	−	−	−	na
Esterase	+	na	na	na	na	na	na	na	+
Esterase lipase	+	na	na	na	na	w	na	na	+
Naphthyl-AS-BI-Phosphohydrolase	-	na	na	na	na	na	na	na	+
Leucine arylamidase	+	na	na	na	na	+	na	na	na
Cystine arylamidase	−	na	na	na	na	w	na	na	na
Valine arylamidase	−	na	na	na	na	w	na	na	+
Utilization of
D-mannose	−	−	+	−	−	+	+	+	−
Amygdalin	−	na	+	−	−	+	w	−	na
L-Arabinose	−	−	+	−	na	na	−	+	−
Cellobiose	−	−	+	+	na	+	+	+	+
Lactose	w	−	+	−	na	na	+	+	+
D-xylose	−	+	+	−	na	na	−	+	+
D-Glucose	w	+	+	+	+	na	+	+	+
Mannitol	−	−	+	−	−	na	+	+	na
Arabinose	−	−	+	−	−	na	−	−	na
L-Xylose	−	+	+	−	na	na	−	na	+
Glycerol	−	+	+	−	na	+	w	+	−
D-Galactose	−	−	+	−	na	na	+	+	na
Hydrolysis of
Starch	w	+	+	+	na	na	v	+	−
Gelatin	−	+	+	+	w	−	+	−	+
G+C content (mol%)	42,22	43±1	43,1	41	43,8	41,1-42,2	39,6	na	43,3
Habitat	hyersaline sediment	deep subterranean thermal waters	alkaline ground water	fermented seafood	wastewater treatment culture system	soil	soil	spacecraft-assembly facility	soil

^†(Bacillus subterraneus strain COOI3B^T, Bacillus foraminis strain CV53^T, Bacillus jeotgali strain YKJ-10^T, Bacillus thioparans strain BMP-1^T, Bacillus boroniphilus strain T-15Z^T, Bacillus bataviensis strain IDA1115^T, Bacillus nealsonii strain FO-92^T, Bacillus kribbensis strain BT080^T).

B. massilioalgeriensis (B. ma), B. subterraneus (B. su), B. foraminis (B. fo), B. jeotgali (B. je), B. thioparans (B. th), B. boroniphilus (B. bo), B. bataviensis (B. ba), B. nealsonii (B. ne) and B. kribbensis (B. kr).

+: positive result, −: negative result, var: variable, w: weak positive result, na: data not available.

Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS protein analysis was performed as previously described [26,49,50]. Briefly, strain EB01^T was plated on 5% sheep blood-enriched Columbia agar (BioMerieux) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Isolated bacterial colonies were picked, and then deposited as a thin film in 12 replicates on a MALDI-TOF steel target plate (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The plates were allowed to dry at room temperature. Each deposit was overlaid with 1.5 µl of matrix solution containing α-cyano-hydroxycinnamic acid (Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) saturated with 50% acetonitrile, 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water, and allowed to co-crystallize with the sample. Measurements were conducted using the Microflex LT spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). Spectra were recorded in the linear positive ion mode over a mass range of 2 to 20 kDa. The acceleration voltage was 20 kV. Spectra were collected as a sum of 240 shots across a spot. The 12 EB01^T spectra were imported into the MALDI BioTyper software (version 3.0, Bruker) and analyzed by standard pattern matching (with default parameter settings) against 6,335 bacterial spectra including 210 spectra from 104 Bacillus species, used as reference data, in the BioTyper database. A score enabled the identification, or not, from the tested species: a score > 2 with a validated species enabled the identification at the species level, a score > 1.7 but < 2 enabled the identification at the genus level; and a score < 1.7 did not enable any identification. For strain EB01^T, the scores obtained ranged from 1.15 to 1.60 thus suggesting that our isolate was a new species. We iadded the spectrum from strain EB01^T (Figure 4) to our database. Spectrum differences with other of Bacillus species are shown in (Figure 5).

Figure 4.
Reference mass spectrum from *B. massilioalgeriensis* strain EB01^T. Spectra from 12 individual colonies were compared and a reference spectrum was generated.

Figure 5.
Gel view comparing *Bacillus massilioalgeriensis* EB01^T spectra with other members of the *Bacillus* genus (B. weihenstephanensis, B. vallismortis, B. thuringiensis, B. thioparans, B. subtilis subsp. subtilis, B. subterraneus, B. shackletonii, B. novalis, B. niacini, B. nealsonii, B. jeotgali, B. flexus, B. circulans, B. bataviensis and B. asahii). The Gel View displays the raw spectra of all loaded spectrum files as a pseudo-electrophoretic gel. The x-axis records the m/z value. The left y-axis displays the running spectrum number originating from subsequent spectra loading. The peak intensity is expressed by a grey scale scheme code. The grey scale bar on the right y-axis indicates the relation between the shade of grey a peak is displayed with and the peak intensity in arbitrary units.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position and 16S rRNA similarity to other members of the genus Bacillus, and is part of a study of Bacillus genus diversity in hypersaline lakes of Algeria. It was the 398^th genome of a Bacillus species and the first genome of Bacillus massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. The EMBL accession number is ERP003483 and consists of 46 contigs. Table 3 shows the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [51].

Table 3.

Project information

MIGS ID	Property	Term
MIGS-31	Finishing quality	High-quality draft
MIGS-28	Libraries used	Nextera XT library
MIGS-29	Sequencing platform	Miseq-Illumina
MIGS-31.2	Sequencing coverage	34×
MIGS-30	Assemblers	Velvet
MIGS-32	Gene calling method	Prodigal
	EMBL Date of Release	January 10, 2014
	EMBL ID	ERP003483
MIGS-13	Project relevance	Study of the Bacillus genus diversity in hypersaline lakes of northeastern Algeria

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

Bacillus massilioalgeriensis sp. nov strain EB01^T, was grown aerobically on 5% sheep blood enriched Columbia agar at 37°C. Three petri dishes were spread and resuspended in a 2 ml sterile Eppendorf tube containing 1ml of TE buffer with acid-washed glass beads (diameter ≤106 µm, Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France). Three cycles of shaking were performed using a FastPrep BIO 101 apparatus (Qbiogene, Strasbourg, France) for 15 sec at level 6.5 (full speed). Then, the supernatant was placed in a new tube along with one hundred µl of 10% SDS and 50 µl of Proteinase K (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and incubated over night at 56°C. The digested mixture was used to perform DNA extraction using the classical phenol-chloroform method. The quality of the DNA was checked on an agarose gel (0.8%) stained with SYBR safe.

Genome sequencing

Genomic DNA of B. massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. strain EB01^T was sequenced on the MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc, San Diego CA 92121, USA) with a paired end and barcode strategy in order to be mixed with 7 others genomic projects constructed with the Nextera XT library kit (Illumina).

The gDNA was quantified by a Qubit assay with the high sensitivity kit (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to 34.4 ng/µL and dilution was performed to provide 1 ng of each small genome as input. The “tagmentation” step fragmented and tagged the DNA to generate an optimum insert size of 1.6 kb, validated on a high sensitivity labchip Calliper-Perkin Elmer (Caliper Life Sciences, Inc, Massachusetts, USA). Then limited cycle PCR amplification completed the tags adapters and introduced dual-index barcodes. After purification on Ampure beads (Lifetechnolgies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), the libraries were normalized on specific beads according to the Nextera XT protocol (Illumina). Normalized libraries are pooled into a single library for sequencing on the MiSeq. The pooled single strand library was loaded onto the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. Automated cluster generation and paired-end sequencing with dual index reads was performed in a single 39-hour run with a 2×250 bp read length. Within this pooled run, the index representation was determined to 7.1%. Total information of 2.4 G bases was obtained from a 320 K/mm2 density with 94.9% (5,757,000 clusters) of the clusters passing quality control (QC) filters. From the genome sequencing process, the 775,420 produced Illumina reads for B. massilioalgeriensis EB01^T were filtered according to the read qualities and sizes using the fastq-mcf program (Ea-utils: command-line tools for processing biological sequencing data) [52]. 714,540 filtered read sequences were kept for genome assembly. The Velvet assembler was used with different kmer values (from 51 to 95) and the best assembly result with kmer value (n=91) producing 46 contigs with sizes from 872 bp to 409,112 bp, was retained for genome annotation.

Genome annotation

Open Reading Frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal [53] with default parameters. The predicted bacterial protein sequences were searched against the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) database and the GenBank database [54] using BLASTP. Ribosomal RNAs were found by using RNAmmer 2.1 server [55,56] and BLASTn against the GenBank database, whereas the tRNAScanSE tool [57] was used to find tRNA genes. Transmembrane helices and lipoprotein signal peptides were predicted using phobius web server [58]. ORFans were identified if their BLASTP E-value was lower than 1e-03 for alignment length greater than 80 amino acids. If alignment lengths were smaller than 80 amino acids, we used an E-value of 1e-05. Artemis [59] was used for data management and DNA Plotter [60] was used for visualization of genomic features. To estimate the mean level of nucleotide sequence similarity at the genome level between B. massilioalgeriensis sp nov. strain EB01^T and seven other Bacillus species, we use the Average Genomic Identity of Orthologous gene Sequences (AGIOS) in-house software. Briefly, this software combines the Proteinortho software [61] for pairwise comparison and detection of orthologous proteins between genomes, then retrieves the corresponding genes and determines the mean percentage of nucleotide sequence identity among orthologous ORFs using the Needleman-Wunsch global alignment algorithm.

Genome properties

The genome is 5,269,577 bp long with 42.22% GC content (Figure 6 and Table 4). It is composed of 46 contigs. Of the 5,193 predicted genes, 5098 were protein-coding genes, and 95 were RNAs (10 genes encode 5S rRNA, 1 gene encodes 16S rRNA, 1 gene encodes 23S rRNA, 83 genes are tRNA genes). A total of 3,217 genes (63.1%) were assigned a putative function (by cogs or by NR blast). 457 genes were identified as ORFans (8.96%). The remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins (1097 genes, 21.52%). The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 5. The properties and statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4.

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

Attribute	Value	% of total^a
Genome size (bp)	5,269,577	100
DNA coding region (bp)	4,342,253	82.4
DNA G+C content (bp)	2,224,760	42.21
Total genes	5,193	100
RNA genes	95	1.82
Protein-coding genes	5,098	98.17
Genes with function prediction	3,217	63.1
Genes assigned to COGs	3,041	59.65
Genes with peptide signals	653	12.8
Genes with transmembrane helices	1,297	25.44

^a The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 5.

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code	Value	% age^a	Description
J	176	3.45	Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A	0	0	RNA processing and modification
K	281	5.51	Transcription
L	165	3.23	Replication, recombination and repair
B	1	0.01	Chromatin structure and dynamics
D	33	0.64	Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y	0	0	Nuclear structure
V	63	1.23	Defense mechanisms
T	144	2.82	Signal transduction mechanisms
M	156	3.06	Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N	48	0.94	Cell motility
Z	0	0	Cytoskeleton
W	0	0	Extracellular structures
U	50	0.98	Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O	110	2.15	Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C	206	4.04	Energy production and conversion
G	277	5.43	Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E	370	7.25	Amino acid transport and metabolism
F	82	1.60	Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H	109	2.13	Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I	142	2.78	Lipid transport and metabolism
P	213	4.17	Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q	86	1.68	Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R	521	10.21	General function prediction only
S	327	6.41	Function unknown
-	2057	40.34	Not in COGs

^a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Comparison with other species Bacillus genomes

Here, we compared the genome of B. massilioalgeriensis strain EB01^T with those of B. kribbensis strain DSM 17871, B. nealsonii strain AAU1, B. bataviensis strain LMG 21833, B. subtilis subsp. subtilis strain 168, B. vallismortis strain DV1-F-3, B. thuringiensis strain BMB171 and B. weihenstephanensis strain KBAB4 (Table 6). The draft genome of B. massilioalgeriensis (5.26Mb) is larger in size than those of B. kribbensis, B. nealsonii, B. subtilis subsp. subtilis and B. vallismortis (5.05, 4.98, 4.22 and 3.88 Mb, respectively) but smaller than those of, B. bataviensis, B. thuringiensis and B. weihenstephanensis (5.37, 5.64 and 5.87 Mb, respectively). B. massilioalgeriensis has a lower G+C content than B. kribbensis, B. subtilis subsp. subtilis and B. vallismortis (42.22% vs 43%, 43.5% and 43.8%, respectively) but higher than B. nealsonii, B. bataviensis, B. thuringiensis and B. weihenstephanensis (42.22% vs 35.1%, 39.6%, 35.2% and 35.5%, respectively). B. massilioalgeriensis has more predicted protein coding genes (5,098) than B. kribbensis, B. nealsonii, B. subtilis subsp. subtilis and B. vallismortis (4,918, 4,789, 4,175 and 4,097, respectively) but fewer protein coding genes than B. bataviensis, B. thuringiensis and B. weihenstephanensis (5,207, 5,352 and 5,653, respectively). In addition, B. massilioalgeriensis shared 1,804, 1,778, 2,017, 1,768, 1,985, 1,541, 1,863 orthologous genes with B. thuringiensis, B. nealsonii, B. bataviensis, B. subtilis subsp. subtilis, B. kribbensis, B. vallismortis, B. weihenstephanensis respectively.

Table 6.

Genomic comparison of B. massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. strain EB01^T with seven other Bacillus species^†.

Species	Strain	Genome accession number	Genome size (Mb)	G+C content
Bacillus massilioalgeriensis	EB01^T	ERP003483	5.26	42.22
Bacillus kribbensis	DSM 17871	AUMQ00000000.1	5.05	43
Bacillus nealsonii	AAU1	ASRU00000000.1	4.98	35.1
Bacillus bataviensis	LMG 21833	AJLS00000000.1	5.37	39.6
Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis	168	NC_000964.3	4.22	43.5
Bacillus vallismortis	DV1-F-3	AFSH00000000.1	3.88	43.8
Bacillus thuringiensis	BMB171	NC_014171.1	5.64	35.2
Bacillus weihenstephanensis	KBAB4	NC_010184.1	5.87	35.5

^†species and strain names, genome accession numbers, sizes and G+C contents.

The average nucleotide sequence identity of orthologous genes ranges from 64.54 to 91.06% among the 8 Bacillus species, and from 64.77 to 69.33% between Bacillus massilioalgeriensis and the other compared genomes (Table 7), thus confirming its new species status.

Table 7.

Genomic comparison of B. massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. strain EB01^T with seven other Bacillus species^†.

Species	B. th	B. ne	B. ba	B. subt	B. ma	B. kr	B. va	B. we
B. thuringiensis	5,352	1,642	1,825	1,786	1,804	1,783	1,548	2,369
B. nealsonii	67.32	4,789	1,746	1,679	1,778	1,751	1,450	1,702
B. bataviensis	66.65	68.78	5,207	1,812	2,017	1,997	1,567	1,904
B. subtilis subsp. subtilis	65.35	65.74	66.03	4,175	1,768	1,841	2,016	1,838
B. massilioalgeriensis	64.77	66.61	69.33	65.44	5,098	1,985	1,541	1,863
B. kribbensis	64.54	66.05	67.20	65.86	66.92	4,918	1,604	1,864
B. vallismortis	64.56	65.05	65.54	91.06	64.92	65.30	4,097	1,592
B. weihenstephanensis	89.95	67.27	66.70	65.46	64.87	64.56	64.70	5,653

^†Numbers of orthologous protein shared between genomes (above diagonal), average percentage similarity of nucleotides corresponding to orthologous proteins shared between genomes (below diagonal). Bold numbers indicate numbers of proteins per genome.

B. thuringiensis (B. th), B. nealsonii (B. ne), B. bataviensis (B. ba), B. subtilis subsp. subtilis (B. subt), B. massilioalgeriensis (B. ma), B. kribbensis (B. kr), B. vallismortis (B. va) and B. weihenstephanensis (B. we).

Conclusion

On the basis of phenotypic (Table 2), phylogenetic and genomic analyses (taxonogenomics) (Table 6), we formally propose the creation of Bacillus massilioalgeriensis sp. nov. that contains the strain EB01^T. This strain has been found in hypersaline lacustrine sediment sample collected from Algeria.

Description of Bacillus algeriensis sp. nov.

Bacillus algeriensis (al.ge.ri.en’sis. NL. masc.adj. algeriensis, of or pertaining to Algeria). Strain EB01^T is a facultative anaerobic Gram-positive, endospore-forming, motile and rod shaped bacterium with rounded ends. Growth is achieved aerobically between 30 and 55°C (optimum 37°C), between 0% and 2.5% NaCl concentration and pH in the range of 6.5–9 (optimum at pH 7). Growth is also observed in microaerophilic atmosphere, however, weak growth was observed under anaerobic conditions. After 24h growth on 5% sheep blood-enriched Columbia agar (BioMerieux) at 37°C, bacterial colonies were smooth, light yellow with 2 mm in diameter. Cells have a length ranging from 2.4 µm to 4.9 µm (mean 3.6 µm) and a diameter ranging from 0.7 µm to 1.1 µm (mean 0.8 µm).

Catalase positive but oxidase negative. Using the commercially available API 50CH system (BioMerieux) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, a weak positive reaction was observed for D-ribose, D-glucose, D-fructose, methyl α-D-glucopyranoside, N-acetylglucosamine, D-maltose, D-lactose, D-melibiose, D-saccharose, D-trehalose, D-tagatose, and hydrolysis of starch. Other tests were negative. Using the API ZYM system (BioMerieux), positive reactions were observed for alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, α chymotrypsin, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, N-acetyl-glucosaminidase and a weak positive reaction was observed for acid phosphatase. The nitrate reduction and β-galactosidase reaction was also positive, but urease and indole production were negative. B. massilioalgeriensis was susceptible to amoxicillin, nitrofurantoin, erythromycin, doxycycline, rifampin, vancomycin, gentamycin, imipenem, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, but resistant to nalidixic acid.

The G+C content of the genome is 42.22. The 16S rRNA and genome sequences are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers HG315679 and EMBL database under accession number ERP003483, respectively. The type strain EB01^T (= CSUR P857 = DSM 27334) was isolated from sediment sample of the hypersaline lake Ezzemoul sabkha of Oum-El-Bouaghi region in northeastern Algeria.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Linda Hadjadj for technical assistance and Xegen company for automating the genome annotation process.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)

Unité de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses et tropicales émergentes (URMITE), UMR CNRS, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Aix-Marseille-Université, Marseille, France

(2)

Département de Biochimie, Faculté des Sciences, Université Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algérie

(3)

Département des Sciences Biologiques, Faculté des Sciences, Université El Hadj Lakhdar, Batna, Algérie

References

Cohn F. Untersuchungen über Bakterien. Beitr Biol Pflanz 1872; 1:127–224.Google Scholar
Parte AC. LPSN-list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 42:613–616. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Nicholson WL. Roles of Bacillus endospores in the environment. Cell Mol Life Sci 2002; 59:410–416. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-002-8433-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Moshafi MH, Forootanfar H, Ameri A, Shakibaie M, Noudeh G, Razavi M. Antimicrobial activity of Bacillus sp. strain FAS1 isolated from soil. Pak J Pharm Sci 2011; 24:269–275. PubMedPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bumpus SB, Evans BS, Thomas PM, Ntai I, Kelleher NL. A proteomics approach to discovering natural products and their biosynthetic pathways. Nat Biotechnol 2009; 27:951–960. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1565PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jernigan JA, Stephens DS, Ashford DA, Omenaca C, Topiel MS, Galbraith M, Tapper M, Fisk TL, Zaki S, Popovic T, et al. Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: the first 10 cases reported in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:933–944. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0706.010604PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bottone EJ. Bacillus cereus, a volatile human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23:382–398. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00073-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. Elsevier 2010, 4320p.Google Scholar
Stackebrandt E, Frederiksen W, Garrity GM, Grimont PA, Kämpfer P, Maiden MC, Nesme X, Rosselló-Mora R, Swings J, Trüper HG, et al. Re port of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1043–1047. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02360-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tindall BJ, Rossello-Mora R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kampfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:249–266. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.016949-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbial Today 2006; 33:152–155.Google Scholar
Rossello-Mora R. DNA-DNA Reassociation Methods Applied to Microbial Taxonomy and Their Critical Evaluation. In: Stackebrandt E (ed), Molecular Identification, Systematics, and population Structure of Prokaryotes. Springer, Berlin 2006. p. 23–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Welker M, Moore ER. Applications of whole-cell matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry in systematic microbiology. Syst Appl Microbiol 2011; 34:2–11. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2010.11.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ramasamy D, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Padhmanabhan R, Rossi M, Sentausa E, Raoult D, Fournier PE. A polyphasic strategy incorporating genomic data for the taxonomic description of novel bacterial species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:384–391.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Gorlas A, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massiliosenegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:264–278. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3496989PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Keita MB, Diene SM, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE, Bittar F. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massiliogorillae sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 9:93–105. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4388124PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mishra AK, Pfleiderer A, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massilioanorexius sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:465–479. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4087826PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kokcha S, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Million M, Leroy Q, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:346–355. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2776064PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Rivet O, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Paenibacillus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:70–81. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3056450PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Genome sequence and description of Timonella senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the suborder Micrococcinae. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:318–335. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3476977PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of of Dielma fastidiosa gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the Family Erysipelotrichaceae. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:336–351. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3567059PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mishra AK, Hugon P, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Enorma massiliensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the Family Coriobacteriaceae. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:290–305. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3426906PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hugon P, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacillus massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:1–14. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3466975PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Mishra AK, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Enterobacter massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:399–412. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3396830PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:370–381. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3366764PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Roux V, ElKarkouri K, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Kurthia massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:221–232. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3206554PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the do mains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals concerning the higher taxa of bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-28-1-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Murray RGE. The Higher Taxa, or, a Place for Everything…? In: Holt JG (ed). Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First Edition, Volume 1, The Williams and Wilkins Co, Baltimore 1984; p. 31–34.Google Scholar
Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119–169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. Class I. Bacilli class nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity GM, Jones D, N.R. Krieg W. Ludwig W, Rainey EA, Schleifer KH, Withman WB. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition, vol 3 (The Firmicutes), Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York 2009, pp.19–20.Google Scholar
List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. List no. 132. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA, eds. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225
Prévot AR. In: Hauduroy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou J, Prévot AR, Rosset, Urbain A (eds) Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes, 2nd ed., Masson, Paris, 1953, pp. 1–692.Google Scholar
Fischer A. Untersuchungen über bakterien. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik 1985; 27:1–163.Google Scholar
Gibson T, Gordon RE. Genus I. Bacillus Cohn 1872; 174; Nom. gen. cons. Nomencl. Comm. Intern. Soc. Microbiol. 1937, 28; Opin. A. Jud. Comm. 1955, 39. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Eighth Edition, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1974, p. 529–550.Google Scholar
Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425. PubMedPubMedGoogle Scholar
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kanso S, Greene AC, Patel BKC. Bacillus subterraneus sp. nov., an iron- and manganese-reducing bacterium from a deep subsurface Australian thermal aquifer. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:869–874. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.01842-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tiago I, Pires C, Mendes V, Morais PV, da Costa MS, Verissimo A. Bacillus foraminis sp. nov., isolated from a non-saline alkaline groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2571–2574. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64281-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Yoon JH, Kang SS, Lee KC, Kho YH, Choi SH, Kang KH, Park YH. Bacillus jeotgali sp. nov., isolated from jeotgal, Korean traditional fermented seafood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1087–1092. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-3-1087View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Euzeby J. Validation List no. 117. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1933–1934. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65495-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Perez-Ibarra BM, Flores ME, Garcia-Varela M. Isolation and characterization of Bacillus thioparus sp. nov., chemolithoautotrophic, thiosulfate-oxidizing bacterium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2007; 271:289–296. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00729.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ahmed I, Yokota A, Fujiwara T. A novel highly boron tolerant bacterium, Bacillus boroniphilus sp. nov., isolated from soil, that requires boron for its growth. Extremophiles 2007; 11:217–224. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00792-006-0027-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Heyrman J, Vanparys B, Logan NA, Balcaen A, Rodriguez-Diaz M, Felske A, De Vos P. Bacillus novalis sp. nov., Bacillus vireti sp. nov., Bacillus soli sp. nov., Bacillus bataviensis sp. nov. and Bacillus drentensis sp. nov., from the Drentse A grasslands. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:47–57. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02723-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Venkateswaran K, Kempf M, Chen F, Satomi M, Nicholson W, Kern R. Bacillus nealsonii sp. nov., isolated from a spacecraft-assembly facility, whose spores are gamma-radiation resistant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:165–172. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02311-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lim JM, Jeon CO, Lee JR, Park DJ, Kim CJ. Bacillus kribbensis sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample in Jeju, Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2912–2916. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65227-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Seng P, Rolain JM, Fournier PE, La Scola B, Drancourt M, Raoult D. MALDI-TOF-mass spectrometry applications in clinical microbiology. Future Microbiol 2010; 5:1733–1754. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fmb.10.127View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, Raoult D. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:543–551. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/600885View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
fastq-mcf program. http://code.google.com/p/ea-utils
Prodigal. http://prodigal.ornl.gov
GenBank database. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank
RNAmmer 1.2 Server. http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/RNAmmer/
Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.5.0955PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kall L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer EL. Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction—the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:W429–W432. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm256PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:944–945. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:119–120. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn578PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lechner M, Findeiss S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:124–133. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-124PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus algeriensis sp. nov.

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Classification and features

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

Genome sequencing

Genome annotation

Genome properties

Comparison with other species Bacillus genomes

Conclusion

Description of Bacillus algeriensis sp. nov.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors’ Affiliations

References

Copyright

Environmental Microbiome

Contact us