Skip to main content

Complete genome sequence of Thermocrinis albus type strain (HI 11/12T)

Abstract

Thermocrinis albus Eder and Huber 2002 is one of three species in the genus Thermocrinis in the family Aquificaceae. Members of this family have become of significant interest because of their involvement in global biogeochemical cycles in high-temperature ecosystems. This interest had already spurred several genome sequencing projects for members of the family. We here report the first completed genome sequence a member of the genus Thermocrinis and the first type strain genome from a member of the family Aquificaceae. The 1,500,577 bp long genome with its 1,603 protein-coding and 47 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Introduction

Strain HI 11/12T (= DSM 14484 = JCM 11386) is the type strain of the species Thermocrinis albus [1]. Officially, the genus Thermocrinis currently contains three species [2], however, it should be noted that at the time of writing, the 16S rDNA sequence of the type strain of Thermocrinis ruber held in the DSMZ open collection as DSM 12173 does not correspond with that published under AJ005640. The generic name derives from the Greek word ‘therme’, meaning ‘heat’, and the Latin word ‘crinis’, hair, meaning ‘hot hair’, referring to the long hair-like filamentous cell structures found in the high-temperature environments, such as hot-spring outlets [3]. These long filaments are formed under conditions where there is a continuous flow of medium. The species name is derived from the Greek word ‘alphos’, white, referring to the cell color [1]. Strain HI 11/12T has been isolated from whitish streamers in Hveragerthi, Iceland [3]. Other strains of the species have been isolated from further high-temperature habitats in Iceland, but also in Kamchatka, Russia [1]. Members of the genus Thermocrinis appear to play a major ecological role in global biochemical cycles in such high-temperature habitats [47]. As currently defined the genus does not appear to form a monophyletic group, suggesting that further taxonomic work is necessary.

The large interest in the involvement of members of the family Aquificaceae in global biogeochemical cycles in high-temperature ecosystems made them attractive targets for early genome sequencing, e.g.Aquifex aeolicus’ [8], the third hyperthermophile whose genome was already decoded in 1998 [9]. Like ‘A. aeolicus’ (a name that was never validly published) strain VF5 [10], Hydrogenobaculum sp. Y04AAS1 (CP001130, JGI unpublished) and Hydrogenivirga sp. 128-5-R1-1 (draft, Moore Foundation) do not represent type strains. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for T. albus HI 11/12T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Only four cultivated strains are reported for the species T. albus in addition to HI 11/12T: Strains H7L1B and G3L1B from the same team that isolated HI 11/12T [1], and SRI-48 (AF255599) from hot spring microbial mats [11]. All three strains originate from Iceland and share 98.9-99.7% 16S rRNA sequence identity with HI 11/12T. The only non-Icelandic isolate, UZ23L3A (99.2%), originates from Kamchatka (Russia) [1]. Almost all uncultured clones also originate from Iceland: clones KF6 and HV-7 (GU233821 and GU233840, >99%) from water-saturated sediment in the Krafla and Hveragerdi geothermal systems, respectively. Clones GY1-1 and GY1-2 (GU233809, GU233812, >99%) from water-saturated sediment Geysir hot springs; clone SUBT-1 (AF361217, 99.2%) from subterranean hot springs [12], and clone PIce1 (AF301907, 99.3%) as the dominant clone from a blue filament community of a thermal spring. Only clone PNG_TB_4A2.5H2_B11 (EF100635, 95.9%) originated from a non-Icelandic source: a heated, arsenic-rich sediment of a shallow submarine hydrothermal system on Ambitle Island, Papua New Guinea. According to the original publication the 16S rRNA of the type strain of the closest related species within the genus, T. ruber [3], shares 95.2% sequence identity, whereas the type strains from the closest related genus, Hydrogenobacter, share 94.7-95.0% sequence identity, as determined with EzTaxon [13]. However, as noted above the 16S rDNA sequence of the T. ruber strain held in the DSMZ (DSM 12173) does not correspond with the sequence deposited (AJ005640). Environmental samples and metagenomic surveys featured in the NCBI database contain not a single sequence with >88% sequence identity (as of February 2010), indicating that the species T. albus might play a rather limited and regional role in the environment.

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of T. albus HI 11/12T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequence of the single 16S rRNA gene copy in the genome differs by seven nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from DSM 14484 (AJ278895), which contains two ambiguous base calls.

Figure 1.
figure1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. albus HI 11/12T relative to the other type strains within the family Aquificaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,439 aligned characters [14,15] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [16] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 250 bootstrap replicates [17] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [18] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. Note that the sequence AJ005640 does not correspond with that from the type strain of T. ruber deposited as DSM 12173.

When grown in the laboratory in a continuous flow of medium, for example in a glass chamber [1], strain HI 11/12T exhibits filamentous growth with a length of 10–60 µm [1]. When grown in static culture, the strain grows singly or in pairs [1]. The cells are short rods with 0.5–0.6 µm in width by 1–3 µm in length and motile by means of a monopolar monotrichous flagellum [1] (Figure 2 and Table 1). However, no flagella are visible in Figure 2. A regularly arrayed surface layer protein was not observed [1].

Figure 2.
figure2

Scanning electron micrograph of T. albus HI 11/12T

Table 1. Classification and general features of T. albus HI 11/12T according to the MIGS recommendations [19]

Strain 11/12T is microaerophilic with oxygen as electron acceptor [1]. Strain 11/12T appears to be strictly chemolithoautotrophic [1]. This differentiates T. albus from its two sister species T. ruber and T. minervae, which both can also grow chemoorganoheterotrophically [3,24]. Strain 11/12T grows optimally under microaerophilic conditions when hydrogen and sulfur are present simultaneously as electron donors [1], however, no growth is observed on nitrate. Physiological characteristics such as the wide temperature preference are reported in Table 1.

Chemotaxonomy

The cell wall of strain 11/12T contains meso-diaminopimelic acid [1]. There are no reports on the presence of a lipopolysaccharide in the typical Gram-negative cell wall, although there are reports of an LPS in Aquifex pyrophilus [27,28]. Cellular polyamines are important to stabilize cellular nucleic acid structure as a major function, and may function in thermophilic eubacteria as important chemotaxonomic markers [29]. In the genus Thermocrinis, the major polyamines are spermidine and a quaternary branched penta-amine, N4-bis(aminopropyl)-norspermidine [29].

The major fatty acids in strain HI 11/12T are cyclo-C21:0 (42%, 2 isomers), C18:0 (14%), C20:1 cΔ11 (10.7%), C20:1 cΔ13 (8.2%), C20:1 tΔ11 (5.4%), and C20:1 tΔ13 (3.5%) [30]. All other fatty acids are below 2.9%) [30]. The polar lipids are based on ester linked fatty acids (diacyl glycerols) and monoether (probably in the form of monoester-monoether glycerols), in which the ether linked side chain includes C18:0 (78.5%), C20:0 (2.0%), C20:1 (17.6%) and C21:0 (1.9%) side chains [30].

T. albus belongs to a group of organisms where characteristic sulfur containing napthoquinones, menathioquinones (2-methylthio-1,4-naphthoquinone) are present [3135]. The polar lipids reported in members of the genera Aquifex, Hydrogenobaculum, Hydrogenothermus and Thermocrinis are also characteristic, with an unusual aminopentanetetrol phospholipid derivative being present in all strains examined [36,37]. Where detailed analyses have been carried out phosphatidylinositol has also been reported [37]. Stöhr et al. labeled these lipids PNL and PL1 respectively [31].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [38]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [18] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Genome sequencing project information

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. albus HI 11/12T, DSM 14484, was grown in DSMZ medium 887 (OS Medium) [39] at 80°C. DNA was isolated from 1–1.5 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive Kit (Epicentre MGP04100) with a modified protocol for cell lysis, using an additional 5 µl mutanolysin to standard lysis solution, and one hour incubation on ice after the MPC-step.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of strain HI 11/12T was sequenced using a combination of Illumina [40] and 454. An Illumina GAii shotgun library with reads of 447 Mb, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 287 bases, and a paired end 454 library with average insert size of 17 Kb were generated for this genome. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/. Illumina sequencing data were assembled with VELVET [41], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. Draft assemblies were based on 79 Mb 454 draft data. Newbler parameters were -consed - a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The initial assembly contained six contigs in one scaffold. We converted the initial 454 assembly into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package (www.phrap.com) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap. Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (unpublished; http://www.jgi.doe.gov/), Dupfinisher or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing [42]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J-F. Chan, unpublished). A total of 68 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The completed genome sequence had an error rate of less than 1 in 100,000 bp

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [43] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome an-notation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [44]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [45].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 1,500,577 bp long chromosome with a 46.9% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 1,650 genes predicted, 1,593 were protein coding genes, and 47 RNAs; 10 pseudogenes were identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (75.2%) were assigned with a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Figure 3.
figure3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3. Genome Statistics
Table 4. Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Insights from the genome sequence

With only very few papers published on the organism [1,2], and only one gene sequence (16S rRNA) available in GenBank from strain HI 11/12T, a comparison of already known sequences to the here presented novel genomic data is rather meager for T. albus. As shown in Figure 1, there are presently no other type strain genomes from the Aquificaceae available either to allow a meaningful comparative genomics analysis. This might change when other type/neotype strains of species within the genus Thermocrinis which are also part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [38] will become available in the near future.

References

  1. 1.

    Eder W, Huber R. New isolates and physiological properties of the Aquificales and description of Thermocrinis albus sp. nov. Extremophiles 2002; 6:309–318. PubMed doi:10.1007/s00792-001-0259-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Huber R, Eder W, Heldwein S, Wanner G, Huber H, Rachel R, Stetter KO. Thermocrinis ruber gen. nov., sp. nov., a pink-filament-forming hyperthermophilic bacterium isolated from Yellowstone National Park. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998; 64:3576–3583. PubMed

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Euzéby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: A folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:590–592. PubMed doi:10.1099/00207713-47-2-590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hall JR, Mitchell KR, Jackson-Weaver O, Kooser AS, Cron BR, Crossey LJ, Takacs-Vesbach CD. Molecular characterization of the diversity and distribution of a thermal spring microbial community by using rRNA and metabolic genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:4910–4922. PubMed doi:10.1128/AEM.00233-08

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Connon SA, Koski AK, Neal AL, Wood SA, Magnuson TS. Ecophysiology and geochemistry of microbial arsenic oxidation within a high arsenic, circumneutral hot spring system of the Alvord Desert. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2008; 64:117–128. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00456.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hamamura N, Macur RE, Korf S, Ackerman G, Taylor WP, Kozubal M, Reysenbach AL, Inskeep WP. Linking microbial oxidation of arsenic with detection and phylogenetic analysis of arsenite oxidase genes in diverse geothermal environments. Environ Microbiol 2009; 11:421–431. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01781.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hügler M, Huber H, Molyneaux SJ, Vetriani C, Sievert SM. Autotrophic CO2 fixation via the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle in different lineages within the phylum Aquificae: evidence for two ways of citrate cleavage. Environ Microbiol 2007; 9:81–92. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01118.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Deckert G, Warren PV, Gaasterland T, Young WG, Lennox AL, Graham DE, Overbeek R, Snead MA, Keller M, Aujay M, et al. The complete genome of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus. Nature 1998; 392:353–358. PubMed doi:10.1038/32831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Klenk HP. The genomics of a hot-water maker. Nat Genet 1998; 19:4–6. PubMed doi:10.1038/ng0598-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Huber R, Stetter KO. Genus I. Aquifex Huber and Stetter 1992e, 656VP (Effective publication: Huber and Stetter in Huber, Wilharm, Huber, Trincone, Burggraf, König, Rachel, Rockinger, Fricke and Stetter 1992b, 349). In: Boone DR, Castenholz WR, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition, vol. 1 (The Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic Bacteria), Springer, New York, 2001, pp. 360–362.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Skirnisdottir S, Hreggvidsson GO, Hjorleifsdottir S, Marteinsson VT, Petursdottir SK, Holst O, Kristjansson JK. Influence of sulfide and temperature on species composition and community structure of hot spring microbial mats. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66:2835–2841. PubMed doi:10.1128/AEM.66.7.2835-2841.2000

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Marteinsson VT, Hauksdottir S, Hobel CF, Kristmannsdottir H, Hreggvidsson GO, Kristjansson JK. Phylogenetic diversity analysis of subterranean hot springs in Iceland. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67:4242–4248. PubMed doi:10.1128/AEM.67.9.4242-4248.2001

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK, Lim YW. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2259–2261. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540–552. PubMed

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452–464. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758–771. PubMed doi:10.1080/10635150802429642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5541:184–200. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:D346–D354. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkp848

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt1360

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Reysenbach AL. Class I, Aquificae phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Vol. 1, Springer, NY, 2001, p. 359.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Reysenbach AL. Order I, Aquificae class nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Vol. 1, Springer, NY, 2001, p. 359.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Reysenbach AL. Family I, Aquificaceae fam. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Vol. 1, Springer, NY, 2001, p. 360.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Caldwell SL, Liu Y, Ferrera I, Beveridge T, Reysenbach A-L. Thermocrinis minervae sp. nov., a hydrogen- and sulfur-oxidizing, thermophilic member of the Aquificales from a Costa Rican terrestrial hot spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol (In press). PubMed

  25. 25.

    Classification of Bacteria and Archaea in risk groups Technical rules for biological agents www.baua.de TRBA 466.

  26. 26.

    Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed doi:10.1038/75556

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Plötz BM, Lindner B, Stetter KO, Holst OJ. Characterization of a novel lipid A containing D-galacturonic acid that replaces phosphate residues. The structure of the lipid A of the lipopolysaccharide from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex pyrophilus. Biol Chem 2000; 275:11222–11228. doi:10.1074/jbc.275.15.11222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mamat U, Schmidt HE, Lindner B, Fukase K, Hanuszkiewicz A, Wu J, Meredith TC, Woodard RW, Hilgenfeld R, Mesters JR, et al. WaaA of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus is a monofunctional 3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid transferase involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:22248–22262. PubMed doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.033308

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hosoya R, Hamana K, Niitsu M, Itoh T. Polyamine analysis for chemotaxonomy of thermophilic eubacteria: Polyamine distribution profiles within the orders Aquificales, Thermotogales, Thermodesulfobacteriales, Thermales, Thermoanaerobacteriales, Clostridiales and Bacillales. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2004; 50:271–287. PubMed doi:10.2323/jgam.50.271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jahnke LL, Eder W, Huber R, Hope JM, Hinrichs KU, Hayes JM, Des Marais DJ, Cady SL, Summons RE. Signature lipids and stable carbon isotope analyses of Octopus Spring hyperthermophilic communities compared with those of aquificales representatives. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67:5179–5189. PubMed doi:10.1128/AEM.67.11.5179-5189.2001

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Stöhr R, Waberski A, Völker H, Tindall BJ, Thomm M. Hydrogenothermus marinus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel thermophilic hydrogenoxidizing bacterium, recognition of Calderobacterium hydrogenophilum as a member of the genus Hydrogenobacter and proposal of the reclassification of Hydrogenobacter acidophilus as Hydrogenobaculum acidophilum gen. nov., comb. nov., in the phylum ‘Hydrogenobacter/Aquifex’. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1853–1862. PubMed

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ishii M, Kawasumi T, Igarashi Y, Kodama T, Minoda Y. 2-Methylthio-1,4-naphthoquinone, a new quinone from an extremely thermophilic hydrogen bacterium. Agric Biol Chem 1983; 47:167–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ishii M, Kawasumi T, Igarashi Y, Kodama T, Minoda Y. 2-Methylthio-1,4-naphthoquinone, a unique sulfur containing quinone from a thermophilic hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium, Hydrogenobacter thermophilus. J Bacteriol 1987; 169:2380–2384. PubMed

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nishihara H, Igarashi Y, Kodama T. A new isolate of Hydrogenobacter, an obligately chemolithoautotrophic, thermophilic, halophilic and aerobic hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium from seaside saline hot spring. Arch Microbiol 1990; 153:294–298. doi:10.1007/BF00249085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shima S, Suzuki KI. Hydrogenobacter acidophilus sp. nov., a thermoacidophilic, aerobic, hydrogenoxidizing bacterium requiring elemental sulfur for growth. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:703–708. doi:10.1099/00207713-43-4-703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sturt HF, Summons RE, Smith K, Elvert M. Hinrichs K-U. Intact polar membrane lipids in prokaryotes and sediments deciphered by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization multistage mass spectrometry — new biomarkers for biogeochemistry and microbial ecology. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2004; 18:617–628. PubMed doi:10.1002/rcm.1378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yoshino J, Sugiyama Y, Sakuda S, Kodama T, Nagasawa H, Ishii M, Igarashi Y. Chemical structure of a novel aminophospholipid from Hydrogenobacter thermophilus strain TK-6. J Bacteriol 2001; 183:6302–6304. PubMed doi:10.1128/IB.183.21.6302-6304.2001

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462:1056–1060. PubMed doi:10.1038/nature08656

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    List of growth media used at DSMZ: http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php

  40. 40.

    Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 2004; 5:433–438. PubMed doi:10.1517/14622416.5.4.433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 2008; 18:821–829. PubMed doi:10.1101/gr.074492.107

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sims D, Brettin T, Detter J, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F, Lucas S, et al. Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T). Stand Genomic Sci 2009; 1:12–20. doi:10.4056/sigs.761

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-119

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A Gene Prediction Improvement Pipeline for microbial genomes. Nat Methods (In press).

  45. 45.

    Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271–2278. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy’s Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-1 and SI 1352/1-2.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Peter Klenk.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wirth, R., Sikorski, J., Brambilla, E. et al. Complete genome sequence of Thermocrinis albus type strain (HI 11/12T). Stand in Genomic Sci 2, 194–203 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.761490

Download citation

Keywords

  • microaerophilic
  • (hyper-)thermophile
  • chemolithoautotrophic
  • biogeochemistry
  • non-sporeforming
  • Gram-negative
  • flagellated
  • non-pathogen
  • Aquificaceae
  • GEBA