- Open Access
The Genome Sequence of a Type ST239 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolate from a Malaysian Hospital
© The Author(s) 2014
- Published: 15 June 2014
We report the genome sequence of a healthcare-associated MRSA type ST239 clone isolated from a patient with septicemia in Malaysia. This clone typifies the characteristics of ST239 lineage, including resistance to multiple antibiotics and antiseptics.
- Staphylococcus aureus
Classification and general features of Staphylococcus aureus MRSA PR01
Species Staphylococcus aureus
Type strain MRSA PR01
Terminal electron receptor
Human respiratory tract, skin
Sample collection time
Genome project history
One 350bp Illumina GAIIx genomic library
Illumina GAIIx, Sanger
CLCBio Genomics Workbench
Gene calling method
Glimmer and GeneMark
Genome Database release
Genbank Date of Release
January 11, 2014
Medical, Tree of life
Growth conditions and DNA isolation
MRSA PR01 was grown overnight under aerobic conditions in Tryptic Soy Broth at 37°C. DNA extraction was performed using MasterPure™ Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre, Madison, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of resultant DNA was assessed by UV spectrophotometry (Nanodrop, Thermo Scientific). 5 µg of genomic DNA (A260/280 = 1.88) was used for library preparation.
Genome sequencing and assembly
The genome sequence was obtained using 104 Mb of paired-end (300 bp spacing) data from the Illumina GAII x platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with 36-bp reads. Sequence data were assembled using CLCBio Genomics Workbench (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). One hundred and ninety-five contigs (N50: 13,272 bp) were generated, and were overlaid with the reference sequence Mu50 using OSLay. Fourteen supercontigs were generated as a result. Gaps were closed using Sanger sequencing.
Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the MRSA PR01 genome
% of totala
Genome size (bp)
DNA G+C content (bp)
Genes assigned to COGs
Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories
RNA processing and modification
Replication, recombination and repair
Chromatin structure and dynamics
Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Signal transduction mechanisms
Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
Intracellular trafficking and secretion
Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
Energy production and conversion
Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
Amino acid transport and metabolism
Nucleotide transport and metabolism
Coenzyme transport and metabolism
Lipid transport and metabolism
Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
General function prediction only
Not in COGs
Initial analysis of the genome revealed several key features. This genome has a typical SCCmec type III cassette, containing cadmium resistance genes. SCCmec type III is a composite element that is comprised of SCCmec and SCCmercury. In the MRSA PR01 genome, like others, this region harbors ccrC, pI258 and Tn554 as well as the genes involved in cadmium resistance. The MRSA PR01 genome contains two pathogenicity islands, and several resistance features were identified such as the qacA gene, which confers resistance to antiseptics such as cationic biocides, quaternary ammonium salts, and diamidines via an export-mediated mechanism, and the norA gene which confers resistance to hydrophilic quinolones such as norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin. There were 9 regions defined as prophage regions by PHAST  with one complete prophage region.genes were identified in the genome. A total of 2,267 genes (72.66%) were assigned a putative function. The remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3. The distribu-tion of genes into COGs and KEGG functional cate-gories is presented in Table 4.
This study is the first to report on the whole genome sequence of a Malaysian MRSA isolate. Preliminary analysis of the genome has highlighted the genetic determinants that are responsible for the organism to adapt easily to selective pressures. Further research is being conducted to provide insight on the adaptive power of this healthcare-associated strain to attain high resistance to antibiotics.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession ANPO00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, ANPO01000000.
Description of Sulfurimonas hongkongensis sp. nov.
Sulfurimonas hongkongensis (hong.kong.en’sis. N.L. fem. adj. hongkongensis pertaining to Hong Kong, the city where the type strain was isolated).
Strain AST-10T is rod-shaped with size of 0.2–0.4 µm × 0.5–1.2 µm. It is an obligate anaerobe and oc-curs singly. The temperature range for growth is 15–35°C, optimum at 30°C. The pH range for growth is 6.5–8.5, optimum at 7.0–7.5. The salinity range for growth is 10–60 g L−1, and optimum at 30 g L−1. Strictly chemolithoautotrophic growth oc-curs with H2, HS- or S2O32− as an electron donor and with nitrate as an electron acceptor. Nitrate is reduced to N2, and reduced sulfur compounds are oxidized into S0 or SO42− (depending on molar ratio of S2O32−/NO3−). The major cellular fatty acids are C14:0, C16:0, 2-OH C16:0, C16:1, C18:0, and C18:1, with C16:0 2-OH as a unique fatty acid different from other spe-cies in the genus Sulfurimonas.
The type strain AST-10T = DSM 2096T = JCM 18418T, was isolated from coastal sediment at the Kai Tak Approach Channel connected to Victoria Harbour in Hong Kong, China. The GC content of the genome is 34.9%. The genome sequence has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession number AUPZ00000000.
Dr. Lin Cai thanks The University of Hong Kong for the Postdoctoral Fellowship. This study was finan-cially supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (HKU7201/11E).
- Inagaki F, Takai K, Kobayashi H, Nealson KH, Horikoshi K. Sulfurimonas autotrophica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel sulfur-oxidizing epsilonproteobacterium isolated from hydrothermal sediments in the Mid-Okinawa Trough. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1801–1805. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02682-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takai K, Suzuki M, Nakagawa S, Miyazaki M, Suzuki Y, Inagaki F, Horikoshi K. Sulfurimonas paralvinellae sp. nov., a novel mesophilic, hydrogen- and sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph within the Epsilonproteobacteria isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent polychaete nest, reclassification of Thiomicrospira denitrificans as Sulfurimonas denitrificans comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Sulfurimonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1725–1733. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64255-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Labrenz M, Grote J, Mammitzsch K, Boschker HT, Laue M, Jost G, Glaubitz S, Jurgens K. Sulfurimonas gotlandica sp. nov., a chemoautotrophic and psychrotolerant epsilonproteobacterium isolated from a pelagic Baltic Sea redoxcline, and an emended description of the genus Sulfurimonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4141–4148. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.048827-0PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grote J, Schott T, Bruckner CG, Glockner FO, Jost G, Teeling H, Labrenz M, Jurgens K. Genome and physiology of a model Epsilonproteobacterium responsible for sulfide detoxification in marine oxygen depletion zones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:506–510. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111262109PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sievert SM, Scott KM, Klotz MG, Chain PS, Hauser LJ, Hemp J, Hugler M, Land M, Lapidus A, Larimer FW, et al. Genome of the epsilonproteobacterial chemolithoautotroph Sulfurimonas denitrificans. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:1145–1156. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01844-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sikorski J, Munk C, Lapidus A, Ngatchou Djao OD, Lucas S, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Tice H, Han C, Cheng JF, et al. Complete genome sequence of Sulfurimonas autotrophica type strain (OK10). Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 3:194–202. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruckner CG, Mammitzsch K, Jost G, Wendt J, Labrenz M, Jurgens K. Chemolithoautotrophic denitrification of Epsilonproteobacteria in marine pelagic redox gradients. Environ Microbiol 2013; 15:1505–1513. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02880.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shao M, Zhang T, Fang HH. Autotrophic denitrification and its effect on metal speciation during marine sediment remediation. Water Res 2009; 43:2961–2968. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang M, Zhang T, Shao MF, Fang HH. Autotrophic denitrification in nitrate-induced marine sediment remediation and Sulfurimonas denitrificans-like bacteria. Chemosphere 2009; 76:677–682. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.03.066View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shao MF, Zhang T, Fang HH, Li X. The effect of nitrate concentration on sulfide-driven autotrophic denitrification in marine sediment. Chemosphere 2011; 83:1–6. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.042View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Validation List No. 107. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1–6. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64188-0
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class V. Epsilonproteobacteria class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1145.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order I. Campylobacterales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1145.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Family II. Helicobacteraceae fam. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1168.Google Scholar
- Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. A Place for DNADNA Reassociation and 16s Ribosomal-RNA Sequence-Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:846–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-44-4-846View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- RossellóoMora R. Amann R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001; 25:39–67. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(00)00040-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gevertz D, Telang AJ, Voordouw G, Jenneman GE. Isolation and characterization of strains CVO and FWKO B, two novel nitrate-reducing, sulfideoxidizing bacteria isolated from oil field brine. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66:2491–2501. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.6.2491-2501.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:33–36. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.33PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu S, Zhu Z, Fu L, Niu B, Li W. WebMGA: a customizable web server for fast metagenomic sequence analysis. BMC Genomics 2011; 12:444. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-444PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:W29–W37. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr367PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D290–D301. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1065PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 2011; 8:785–786. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1701View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 2001; 305:567–580. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar