Skip to main content

The Genome Sequence of a Type ST239 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolate from a Malaysian Hospital

Abstract

We report the genome sequence of a healthcare-associated MRSA type ST239 clone isolated from a patient with septicemia in Malaysia. This clone typifies the characteristics of ST239 lineage, including resistance to multiple antibiotics and antiseptics.

Introduction

Antibiotic resistance in S. aureus is a major concern, as an increasing number of infections are caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic position of S. aureus in relation to other staphylococci. In Malaysia, the incidence of MRSA-related infections is a cause of concern in hospitals country-wide. Health-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) has been dominated by a few lineages in Southeast Asia, particularly ST239. Sequence type 239 is an international healthcare-associated (HA) MRSA lineage prevalent in Asia, South America and Eastern Europe, which includes EMRSA-1, -4, -7, and -11 and the Brazilian, Portuguese, Hungarian, and Viennese clones. Strains of type ST239 are typically resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics and antiseptics such as β-lactam antibiotics.

Figure 1.
figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Staphylococcus aureus strain PR01 relative to other type strains within the Staphylococcaceae. The strains and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA genes are: S. aureus strain ATCC 12600, L36472; S. saprophyticus strain ATCC 15305, AP008934; S. epidermidis strain ATCC 14990, D83363; S. hominis strain DSM 20328, X66101; S. haemolyticus strain CCM2737, X66100; and S. cohnii strain ATCC 49330, AB009936. The tree uses sequences aligned by the RDP aligner, and uses the Jukes-Cantor corrected distance model to construct a distance matrix based on alignment model positions without the use of alignment inserts, and uses a minimum comparable position of 200. The tree is built with RDP Tree Builder, which uses Weighbor [1] with an alphabet size of 4 and length size of 1000. The building of the tree also involves a bootstrapping process repeated 100 times to generate a majority consensus tree [2]. Staphylococcus lutrae (X84731) was used as an outgroup.

Classification and features

We have chosen a representative of an MRSA strain, termed MRSA PR01 isolated from a patient with septicemia, isolated from a hospital in Kuala Lumpur. Table 1 indicates general information gathered on MRSA PR01. The MRSA PR01 strain has been identified as sequence type 239 (ST239) by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Initial disc susceptibility tests showed that the strain is resistant to β-lactam antibiotics oxacillin, ampicillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, gentamicin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole.

Table 1. Classification and general features of Staphylococcus aureus MRSA PR01

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing as a representative of MRSA infection in a local Malaysian hospital. The genome sequences of this organism were deposited in GenBank (WGS database). Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed at the Integrative Pharmacogenomics Centre (PROMISE), UiTM. Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [14].

Table 2. Project information

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

MRSA PR01 was grown overnight under aerobic conditions in Tryptic Soy Broth at 37°C. DNA extraction was performed using MasterPure™ Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre, Madison, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of resultant DNA was assessed by UV spectrophotometry (Nanodrop, Thermo Scientific). 5 µg of genomic DNA (A260/280 = 1.88) was used for library preparation.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome sequence was obtained using 104 Mb of paired-end (300 bp spacing) data from the Illumina GAII x platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with 36-bp reads. Sequence data were assembled using CLCBio Genomics Workbench (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). One hundred and ninety-five contigs (N50: 13,272 bp) were generated, and were overlaid with the reference sequence Mu50 using OSLay. Fourteen supercontigs were generated as a result. Gaps were closed using Sanger sequencing.

Genome properties

The MRSA PR01 genome consists of a 2,725,110-bp circular chromosome with a GC content of 32.6% (Table 3). The MRSA PR01 genome contains 2668 CDs with 19 rRNA features (). A total of 1722 (64.5%) of protein coding genes were assigned to COGs, and a breakdown of the functional assignment of COG-assigned genes is shown in Table 4. Plasmid sequences were only partially sequenced. Figure 2 depicts genomic regions of interest found in the preliminary analysis of the MRSA PR01 genome.

Figure 2.
figure 2

Visual representation of the MRSA PR01 genome. From outer to inner tracks: Scale (in bases); annotated CDSs colored according to predicted function (red, SCC element; blue, genomic is-land; green, transposon/integrative conjugative element; purple, S. aureus pathogenicity island [SaPI], brown, prophage); forward strand CDS; reverse strand CDS; GC skew.

Table 3. Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the MRSA PR01 genome
Table 4. Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Initial analysis of the genome revealed several key features. This genome has a typical SCCmec type III cassette, containing cadmium resistance genes. SCCmec type III is a composite element that is comprised of SCCmec and SCCmercury. In the MRSA PR01 genome, like others, this region harbors ccrC, pI258 and Tn554 as well as the genes involved in cadmium resistance. The MRSA PR01 genome contains two pathogenicity islands, and several resistance features were identified such as the qacA gene, which confers resistance to antiseptics such as cationic biocides, quaternary ammonium salts, and diamidines via an export-mediated mechanism, and the norA gene which confers resistance to hydrophilic quinolones such as norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin. There were 9 regions defined as prophage regions by PHAST [17] with one complete prophage region.genes were identified in the genome. A total of 2,267 genes (72.66%) were assigned a putative function. The remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3. The distribu-tion of genes into COGs and KEGG functional cate-gories is presented in Table 4.

Conclusion

This study is the first to report on the whole genome sequence of a Malaysian MRSA isolate. Preliminary analysis of the genome has highlighted the genetic determinants that are responsible for the organism to adapt easily to selective pressures. Further research is being conducted to provide insight on the adaptive power of this healthcare-associated strain to attain high resistance to antibiotics.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession ANPO00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, ANPO01000000.

Conclusion

Description of Sulfurimonas hongkongensis sp. nov.

Sulfurimonas hongkongensis (hong.kong.en’sis. N.L. fem. adj. hongkongensis pertaining to Hong Kong, the city where the type strain was isolated).

Strain AST-10T is rod-shaped with size of 0.2–0.4 µm × 0.5–1.2 µm. It is an obligate anaerobe and oc-curs singly. The temperature range for growth is 15–35°C, optimum at 30°C. The pH range for growth is 6.5–8.5, optimum at 7.0–7.5. The salinity range for growth is 10–60 g L−1, and optimum at 30 g L−1. Strictly chemolithoautotrophic growth oc-curs with H2, HS- or S2O32− as an electron donor and with nitrate as an electron acceptor. Nitrate is reduced to N2, and reduced sulfur compounds are oxidized into S0 or SO42− (depending on molar ratio of S2O32−/NO3−). The major cellular fatty acids are C14:0, C16:0, 2-OH C16:0, C16:1, C18:0, and C18:1, with C16:0 2-OH as a unique fatty acid different from other spe-cies in the genus Sulfurimonas.

The type strain AST-10T = DSM 2096T = JCM 18418T, was isolated from coastal sediment at the Kai Tak Approach Channel connected to Victoria Harbour in Hong Kong, China. The GC content of the genome is 34.9%. The genome sequence has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession number AUPZ00000000.

References

  1. Inagaki F, Takai K, Kobayashi H, Nealson KH, Horikoshi K. Sulfurimonas autotrophica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel sulfur-oxidizing epsilonproteobacterium isolated from hydrothermal sediments in the Mid-Okinawa Trough. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1801–1805. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02682-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takai K, Suzuki M, Nakagawa S, Miyazaki M, Suzuki Y, Inagaki F, Horikoshi K. Sulfurimonas paralvinellae sp. nov., a novel mesophilic, hydrogen- and sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph within the Epsilonproteobacteria isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent polychaete nest, reclassification of Thiomicrospira denitrificans as Sulfurimonas denitrificans comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Sulfurimonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1725–1733. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64255-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Labrenz M, Grote J, Mammitzsch K, Boschker HT, Laue M, Jost G, Glaubitz S, Jurgens K. Sulfurimonas gotlandica sp. nov., a chemoautotrophic and psychrotolerant epsilonproteobacterium isolated from a pelagic Baltic Sea redoxcline, and an emended description of the genus Sulfurimonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4141–4148. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.048827-0

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grote J, Schott T, Bruckner CG, Glockner FO, Jost G, Teeling H, Labrenz M, Jurgens K. Genome and physiology of a model Epsilonproteobacterium responsible for sulfide detoxification in marine oxygen depletion zones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:506–510. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111262109

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sievert SM, Scott KM, Klotz MG, Chain PS, Hauser LJ, Hemp J, Hugler M, Land M, Lapidus A, Larimer FW, et al. Genome of the epsilonproteobacterial chemolithoautotroph Sulfurimonas denitrificans. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:1145–1156. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01844-07

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sikorski J, Munk C, Lapidus A, Ngatchou Djao OD, Lucas S, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Tice H, Han C, Cheng JF, et al. Complete genome sequence of Sulfurimonas autotrophica type strain (OK10). Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 3:194–202. PubMed

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruckner CG, Mammitzsch K, Jost G, Wendt J, Labrenz M, Jurgens K. Chemolithoautotrophic denitrification of Epsilonproteobacteria in marine pelagic redox gradients. Environ Microbiol 2013; 15:1505–1513. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02880.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shao M, Zhang T, Fang HH. Autotrophic denitrification and its effect on metal speciation during marine sediment remediation. Water Res 2009; 43:2961–2968. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.04.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang M, Zhang T, Shao MF, Fang HH. Autotrophic denitrification in nitrate-induced marine sediment remediation and Sulfurimonas denitrificans-like bacteria. Chemosphere 2009; 76:677–682. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.03.066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shao MF, Zhang T, Fang HH, Li X. The effect of nitrate concentration on sulfide-driven autotrophic denitrification in marine sediment. Chemosphere 2011; 83:1–6. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.01.042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Validation List No. 107. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1–6. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64188-0

  15. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class V. Epsilonproteobacteria class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1145.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order I. Campylobacterales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1145.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Family II. Helicobacteraceae fam. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1168.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. A Place for DNADNA Reassociation and 16s Ribosomal-RNA Sequence-Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:846–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-44-4-846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. RossellóoMora R. Amann R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001; 25:39–67. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(00)00040-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gevertz D, Telang AJ, Voordouw G, Jenneman GE. Isolation and characterization of strains CVO and FWKO B, two novel nitrate-reducing, sulfideoxidizing bacteria isolated from oil field brine. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66:2491–2501. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.6.2491-2501.2000

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:33–36. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.33

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu S, Zhu Z, Fu L, Niu B, Li W. WebMGA: a customizable web server for fast metagenomic sequence analysis. BMC Genomics 2011; 12:444. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-444

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:W29–W37. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr367

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D290–D301. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1065

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 2011; 8:785–786. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 2001; 305:567–580. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Lin Cai thanks The University of Hong Kong for the Postdoctoral Fellowship. This study was finan-cially supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (HKU7201/11E).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Z. Salleh.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, L.S., Teh, L.K., Zainuddin, Z.F. et al. The Genome Sequence of a Type ST239 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolate from a Malaysian Hospital. Stand in Genomic Sci 9, 933–939 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3887716

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3887716

Keywords