Skip to main content
Download PDF

Endorhizosphere of indigenous succulent halophytes: a valuable resource of plant growth promoting bacteria

Environmental Microbiome volume 18, Article number: 20 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

The adaptability of halophytes to increased soil salinity is related to complex rhizosphere interactions. In this study, an integrative approach, combining culture-independent and culture-dependent techniques was used to analyze the bacterial communities in the endorizosphere of indigenous succulent halophytes Salicornia europaea, Suaeda maritima, and Camphorosma annua from the natural salt marshes of Slano Kopovo (Serbia). The 16 S rDNA analyses gave, for the first time, an insight into the composition of the endophytic bacterial communities of S. maritima and C. annua. We have found that the composition of endophyte microbiomes in the same habitat is to some extent influenced by plant species. A cultivable portion of the halophyte microbiota was tested at different NaCl concentrations for the set of plant growth promoting (PGP) traits. Through the mining of indigenous halotolerant endophytes, we obtained a collection representing a core endophyte microbiome conferring desirable PGP traits. The majority (65%) of the selected strains belonged to the common halotolerant/halophilic genera Halomonas, Kushneria, and Halobacillus, with representatives exhibiting multiple PGP traits, and retaining beneficial traits in conditions of the increased salinity. The results suggest that the root endosphere of halophytes is a valuable source of PGP bacteria supporting plant growth and fitness in salt-affected soils.

Introduction

Halophytes, which make up about 1% of the world’s flora species [20], developed various strategies to cope with salinity stress and to survive and reproduce across different saline environments. The increased accumulation of salts has adverse effects on soil physicochemical and biological properties, disturbing the ecological balance and affecting the growth and diversity of organisms living on and in the soil [45]. Acting through osmotic stress, ion toxicity, nutrient imbalance, or their combination [60] the increased salinity causes many harmful effects on plants. Its influence on basic physiological processes such as germination, vegetative growth, and reproduction [60] results in decreased agricultural production and low economic returns. However, it has been shown that the adaptability of plants to different habitats and their survival, particularly under stressful conditions, are influenced by their associated microbial communities, termed as plant microbiota [55]. Due to the co-evolution with the plant in the same hostile environment, the microbiota of halophytes is adapted to the salty habitat and is considered to be the key factor for understanding the adaptation of plants to the saline habitat [16].

A vital part of plant microbiota is represented by Plant Growth Promoting (PGP) bacteria which inhabit the rhizosphere, phyllosphere, and endosphere and support plant growth and health through multifarious PGP traits  [34].

Endophyte microorganisms found in plant root tissues represent a subset of the root microbiota [22] and spend at least parts of their life cycle inside the plant without apparent harm to the host [36]. Whether they originate from the surrounding environment such as bulk soil and rhizosphere or being transmitted via seed [36], endophytic bacteria play a crucial role in plant development, growth, and diversification [29]. Unlike halophilic microorganisms which require salt for growth, halotolerant microorganisms can grow in the absence of NaCl as well as in a wide range of NaCl concentrations, up to 25% in the case of bacteria [69, 16].

As a part of the halophyte microbiota, halotolerant plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria (HPGPE) [76] can contribute to the plant host growth, productivity, and fitness under abiotic and biotic stress [21] through phytostimulation, biofertilization, and biocontrol [22]. The important way of phytostimulation involves 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity, which prevents ethylene from reaching growth-inhibitory concentrations in the plant and represents one of the key bacterial physiological traits that facilitate plant growth (especially) under stress conditions [23].

Exploring the diversity of endophytic bacterial communities of various indigenous halophytes is an initial step toward a better understanding of plant-microbial-soil relations under adverse salinity conditions.

In this study, we aim to explore the endophytic bacterial community from three species of succulent halophytes, Salicornia europaea L., Suaeda maritima (L.) Dumort., and Camphorosma annua Pall., indigenous to natural salt marshes of Slano Kopovo in Vojvodina, a center of biodiversity and representative example of fragile salt marsh habitats that have almost disappeared in this part of Europe.

The aim of the present study was to assess the biodiversity of endophytic root microbiota communities using an integrative approach combining culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques. The culture-dependent techniques enabled the characterization of individual microbiota members, providing insight into the possible ways by which HPGPE support host plant under natural conditions of increased salinity. On the other hand, a profound understanding of plant-microbe interactions requires a wider, culture-independent, analysis of the plant root endorhizosphere microbiota.

Methods

Site description and plant material sampling

The plant material was collected from naturally formed saline lands at Special Nature Reserve „Slano Kopovo“, located in Vojvodina, Serbia. In 2004, Slano Kopovo was included in the list of Ramsar areas and became an internationally recognized important plant area (IPA).

The following three species of characteristic halophyte succulents were selected: Salicornia europaea, Suaeda maritima, and Camphorosma annua, all members of the same family Chenopodiaceae. Three individual and spatially distant plants were randomly selected for each species. The top 0.5–1 cm of soil covered with salt crust was removed and the whole plants, including the surrounding soil, were dug out with a spade. The plant material was transported in sterile plastic bags and the roots and rhizosphere samples were processed within 24 h.

The collection and separation of root endosphere and rhizosphere

A common rhizosphere sample of three collected individuals was made for each plant species. The roots were gently shaken to remove loosely adherent soil. Rhizosphere soil was separated from the root endosphere according to Schlaeppi et al. [57] with modifications. Briefly, the collected roots were cut into 3 cm long segments, starting 0.5 cm from the root base. Root segments were placed in an Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 ml of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and shaken at 180 rpm for 20 min (GFL 3005, Germany) for initial washing. The root washing in PBS was repeated two more times under the same conditions. After short drying on sterile Whatman filter paper, the roots were macerated in sterile saline using a sterile mortar and pestle.

One fraction of the macerated root samples was preserved using DNA/RNA Shield reagent (Zymo Research, USA) (1:10) for microbiota 16 S rDNA analysis while the rest was used for isolation of bacteria.

16 S rDNA analysis of endorhizosphere microbiota

The samples were processed and analyzed with the ZymoBIOMICS® Targeted Sequencing Service for Microbiome Analysis (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) using their standard pipeline. In short, DNA was extracted with the ZymoBIOMICS® DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). Bacterial 16 S ribosomal RNA gene targeted sequencing was performed using the Quick-16 S™ NGS Library Prep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) with Zymo Research custom-designed primers. The final library was sequenced on Illumina® MiSeq™ with a v3 reagent kit (600 cycles). The sequencing was performed with > 10% PhiX spike-in. Subsequently, the unique amplicon sequences were inferred from raw reads using the DADA2 pipeline [7]. Chimeric sequences were also removed with the DADA2 pipeline. Chimeras and singletons were filtered from the dataset before analysis and operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered at 94 and 97% identity, roughly corresponding to genus and species level, respectively. Taxonomy assignment was performed using Uclust from Qiime v.1.9.1 [8] with the Zymo Research 16 S Database internally designed and curated, as a reference database. If applicable, a taxonomy that had significant abundance among different groups was identified by LEfSe [58] using default settings. The community structure of three plants microbiota was compared by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) created using the matrix of the paired-wise distance between samples calculated by the Bray-Curtis (BC) dissimilarity.

Isolation of halotolerant endophytic bacteria

For isolation of halotolerant endophytes, ten-fold serial dilutions of macerated root tissue in sterile saline were prepared. The resulting suspensions were plated in triplicate on Nutrient agar, NA, (Torlak, Serbia) supplemented with NaCl (5, 10 and 15% (w/v)) and filter-sterilized root tissue extract (1% (w/v)). The plates were incubated at 30 °C until the colonies appeared. Morphologically different colonies were picked and the characteristics of selected isolates (colony morphology, cellular morphology, Gram staining, motility, and endospore forming) were determined using standard procedures. The obtained isolates were stored at − 80 °C in 25% glycerol.

Isolation of ACC deaminase producing endophytic bacteria

ACC deaminase producing root endophytes were isolated following the procedures described by Penrose and Glick [49]. To enrich the population of pseudomonads and similar Gram-negative bacteria in the sample, 1 g of the macerated root was incubated in PAF media [49] for 48 h. A 1 ml aliquots of enriched cultures were transferred to 50 ml sterile DF salts minimal medium [13] with (NH4)2SO4 as a nitrogen source and incubated on the orbital platform shaker at 200 rpm and 30 °C. After 24 h, 1 ml of culture was transferred to a 50 ml DF minimal medium supplemented with 3 mM ACC as the sole nitrogen source and incubated overnight. Subsequently, the cultures were diluted, plated on a solid DF medium with 3 mM final ACC (Sigma–Aldrich, USA), and incubated for 72 h at 30 °C.

The colonies that grew on media with ACC as the sole nitrogen source were transferred and maintained on NA plates for further analysis (see section "Quantification of ACC-deaminase activity").

Screening for salt tolerance

All isolates were screened for salt tolerance by inoculating NA plates supplemented with different concentrations of NaCl (0, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 25%) with the overnight culture of endophytes and incubating on 30 °C. After 48 h, the plates were observed for growth.

PGP activity screening

All PGP assays were performed in the presence of 3% and 7% NaCl (w/v) to assess if isolates will retain their PGP properties in elevated salinity.

Quantification of ACC-deaminase activity

The confirmation and quantification of ACC utilizing ability was performed using a colorimetric assay based on the ninhydrin reaction [37] using 96-well PCR plates.

After overnight incubation in Luria broth, LB (tryptone 10 g/L, NaCl 10 g/L, yeast extract 5 g/L) and centrifugation at 8000 xg for 5 min, the cell pellet was washed twice, resuspended in 2 ml of fresh DF medium supplemented with 3 mM ACC as sole nitrogen source, and incubated at 28 °C/200 rpm/24 h. A sample of uninoculated DF-ACC medium was incubated as a control. After incubation, 1 ml of each culture was centrifuged at 8000×g for 5 min and the supernatant was diluted ten-fold. The 60 µl of diluted supernatant was mixed with 120 µl of ninhydrin reagent in a PCR plate and incubated in a boiling water bath for 30 min. The analysis of each sample was performed in triplicate. The change of Ruheman’s purple color in samples in comparison to the control DF-ACC medium indicated ACC utilizing bacteria. The ACC consumptions were quantified by transferring reaction solutions into a flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plate and measuring absorbance at 570 nm (TECAN, Switzerland). The obtained absorbance values were compared to a standard curve created by using the increasing concentrations of ACC (5–500 µM/L).

Indole acetic acid (IAA) production

The IAA production was assessed by the colorimetric assay [47]. Overnight bacterial cultures were transferred to 9 ml of minimal salt media (M9 minimal salts 200 ml/L,1 M MgSO4 2 ml/L, 1 M CaCl2 0.1 ml/L, 20% D-glucose 20 ml/L; M9 minimal salts: Na2HPO4 × 7H2O 64 g/L, KH2PO4 15 g/L, NaCl 2,5 g/L, NH4Cl g/L), supplemented with 100 µg/ml of L-tryptophan (Sigma Aldrich, USA) and incubated for 72 h at 30 °C and 150 rpm. The supernatant obtained by centrifugation at 6000×g/15 min was mixed with Salkowski reagent in a ratio of 1:2. The absorbance at 540 nm (T70 UV / VIS Spectrometer, PG Instruments Ltd) of developed pink color after the 25 min incubation indicated the production of IAA. The concentrations (µg/ml) were determined from a standard curve created using IAA standards (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in concentrations ranging between 1 and 100 µg/ml.

Ammonia production

The isolates were grown in 5 ml Peptone water (Torlak, Serbia) for 72 h at 30 °C. After incubation, 0.5 ml of Nessler’s reagent (Alfapanonia, Serbia) was added to each tube. The color change to bright yellow or brown indicated a positive reaction for ammonia production [9].

Siderophore production

Siderophore production was determined according to the modified Chrome Azurol S (CAS) assay described in Lakshaman et al. [35]. The solid medium supplemented with CAS (Fluka, USA) was spot inoculated with individual colonies and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. A positive reaction for the siderophore production was monitored by the development of a yellow-orange halo around the inoculation site.

Exopolysaccharide (EPS) production

The EPS production was determined according to Paulo et al. [48]. Five µl of overnight bacterial cultures were inoculated on the sterile filter paper discs (5 mm Ø) placed on solid medium for EPS production [27] and incubated for 48 h at 30 °C. The appearance of slimy substances around the discs indicated the production of EPS, while the formation of precipitates in tubes after mixing the slime with 2 ml of 96% ethanol confirmed the reaction.

Biofilm-forming ability

The ability of the isolates to form biofilms was examined by colorimetric crystal violet assay on 96-well microtiter plates according to Stepanović et al. [63] with modifications. After overnight growth of bacteria in LB at 30 °C, the media were removed and wells were washed twice with PBS to remove the non-adherent cells. Biofilms were fixed with methanol, air dried, and stained with 0.4% crystal violet for 15 min. To dissolve the dye, stained biofilms were incubated for 20 min in 33% acetic acid. Absorbance was measured at 630 nm in a microtiter plate reader (TECAN, Switzerland). The sterile medium was used as a negative control. The isolates were classified into the following categories by comparing obtained average OD values to ODc value defined as three standard deviations (SD) above the average OD of the negative control according to Stepanović et al. ([63]):

OD (isolate) ≤ ODc = biofilm non producing.

ODc ≤ OD (isolate) ≤ 2ODc = weak biofilm-producing.

2ODc ≤ OD (isolate) ≤ 4ODc = moderate biofilm-producing.

4ODc ≤ OD (isolate) = strong biofilm-producing.

P, Zn, and K solubilization assays

National Botanical Research Institute’s phosphate (NBRIP) medium with Ca3(PO4)2 was used to test the ability of bacterial isolates to dissolve inorganic phosphates according to Nautiyal [43]. The spot inoculated NBRIP medium plates were incubated for 14 days at 30 °C.

The ability of the isolates to solubilize inorganic sources of Zn was determined on a mineral medium supplemented with 1% ZnO [24] that was incubated for 72 h at 30 °C.

Aleksandrov medium containing K-Al silicates as K-bearing minerals supplemented with brome thymol blue was used for screening the K solubilization potential of isolates [53]. The inoculated plates were incubated for 72 h at 30 °C.

All solubilization assays were performed in triplicate by spotting overnight bacterial culture on test-specific solid media. The appearance of clear zones around colonies indicated the ability of tested bacteria to solubilize inorganic sources of P or Zn, while the appearance of a yellow halo around the colonies was considered as a positive reaction for K solubilization.

The solubilizing ability of isolates was expressed via the solubilization index (Si) and calculated as follows: (colony diameter + halo zone diameter)/colony diameter.

16 S rRNA gene sequencing of selected HPGPE

The selected isolates were identified by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. Genomic DNAs were isolated using Zymo Research Soil Microbe DNA Mini Prep Kit (Zymo Research, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genes coding for 16 S rRNAs were amplified with bacteria-specific primers 27f and 1492r [38]. Generated PCR products were sequenced using BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) using same primers and run on Applied Biosystems 3130 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). Sequences were analyzed and assembled using the SeqMan tool from DNASTAR Software (Lasergene). BlastN program [4] was used to search for similar sequences in the GenBank database services provided by the NCBI.

The partial 16 S rRNA gene sequences of selected strains were deposited in the GenBank under accession numbers given in Table 1.

Results

Microbiota composition analysis

The most abundant bacterial phyla in all three plants were Proteobacteria (72% in S. maritima and C. annua; 47% in S. europaea) and Actinobacteria (14% in S. maritima, 12% in C. annua, 33% in S. europaea), comprising roughly 80% of each microbiota. Other prominent phyla detected were Bacteroidetes and Cyanobacteria in S. maritima, and Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in both C. annua and S. europaea with the addition of Saccharibacteria to the most abundant phyla in S. europaea (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of phyla in S. maritima, C. annua, and S. europaea, and distribution of classes within two major phyla (Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria). Distribution of most abundant classes in Proteobacteria (Alpha-, Beta-, Gamma- and Deltaproteobacteria) are shown in yellow pies, while the most abundant Actinobacteria (Actinobacteria, Acidimicrobiia, Nitriliruptoria) are shown in blues pies. Most of Bacterioidetes make classes Cytophagia (3.33% in S. maritima, 4.30% in C. annua, and 3.22% in S. europaea) and Flavobacteria (in S. europaea 3.22%), in Firmicutes class Bacilli makes 5.19% in C. annua and 2.53% in S. europaea

Full size image

C. annua showed the lowest diversity of subdominant phyla (> 1% of relative abundance), counting only three, while complexity of the composition of subdominant phyla was higher in S. maritima (5 phyla) and S. europaea (6 phyla) as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Complexity of phyla distribution in three halophyte plants

Full size image

Examination of the relative abundances of phyla, classes (Fig. 1), and orders (Additional file 1: Table SM1) primarily revealed differences between S. maritima and C. annua on one side, and S. europaea on the other side.

At the family level, by far the most abundant family in S. maritima and C. annua were Pseudomonadaceae (16.64% and 12.02%, respectively) followed by Rhodocyclaceae (6.96% and 19.29%). In S. europaea, there was no single prominent family, but four families with percentile abundances between 6 and 8% (Promicromonosporaceae 8.05%, Rhodobacteraceae 6.44%, Halomonadaceae 7.82%, and Pseudomonadaceae 5.98%). A more detailed distribution of families in all three plant endorhizosphere is given in Additional file 1: Table SM2.

The results on alpha diversity showed variation in species abundance between S. maritima, C. annua, and S. europaea (374, 400, and 264 unique reads per 16,230 reads, respectively). PCoA plots of beta diversity of S. maritima and C. annua locate closely indicating that these two plants mostly contain the same bacterial genera and have similar microbial composition profiles (Additional file 1: Figure SM3). BC dissimilarity between S. europaea compared to S. maritima and C. annua was below 0.25, suggesting a somewhat different microbial composition profile.

An analysis of the distribution of the most abundant OTUs between the three plants revealed that only 19.09% of genera were present in all three plants, where 62.75%, 60.32%, and 25.56% were shared between S. maritima and C. annua, C. annua and S. europaea, and S. maritima and S. europaea, respectively. Sample clustering showed that S. maritima and C. annua shared most of the abundant genera (genera having over 1% abundance), differing only by the presence of one unidentified genus from the phylum Saccharibacteria (Additional file 1: Table SM4, Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Biodiversity of genera between three halophyte plants. S.m., Suaeda maritima, C.a., Camphorosma annua, S.e., Salicornia europaea. (*) signifies rare bacteria where taxonomy could be determined only up to family level

Full size image

At the species level, there were several representatives of certain genera that stood out both in percentage and in number. Genus Azoarcus was represented with 6 species in S. maritima, 8 species in C. annua, and 3 species in S. Europaea. Notedly, genus Azoarcus was most prominent in C. annua with abundance of 17.66%. Pseudomonas was the other genus with marked diversity in all three plants. The microbiota of S. maritima harbored 11 different Pseudomonas species and the genus was most prominent with 16.64% abundance, while C. annua and S. europaea harbored 10 and 8 Pseudomonas species respectively. Notable was the presence of species with high identity to Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes that made 5.45% in S. maritima and 6.82% in C. annua. Apart from members of Azoarcus and Pseudomonas genera, S. maritima and C. annua shared distinct presence of several other bacterial species belonging to genera Hydrogenophaga, Altererythrobacter, Paracoccus, Jonesia, Pelagibacterium, Rhizobium, Luteimonas aestuarii, and Oceanisphaera, all present in percentage between 1 and 4% except Oceanisphaera sp.56,188 (4.24% in S. maritima). While the presence of Streptomyces genus was neglectable in S. maritima and C. annua, in S. europaea it contributed with 4.83% counting 3 species. The table of species detected in all three plants is given in the supplementary data (Additional file 1: Table SM5).

Collection of endophyte isolates

A total of 32 endophytes were isolated from the root tissues of S. maritima, C. annua, and S. europaea. Of these, 20 isolates were selected based on their ability to exhibit at least two PGP traits at 3% NaCl. The majority of halotolerant isolates had bright, orange, or yellow colored colonies (87%) and 80% were Gram-negative and rod-shaped. On the other hand, 20% of the isolates were Gram-positive and rod-shaped, except one strain of cocci.

Five selected Gram-negative isolates (14A1, 14A2, 15A1, 15A2, 16A1) were able to grow on DF agar containing ACC, which indicated their ACC deaminase activity. Isolates 14A1 and 14A2 originated from S. maritima were coccobacilli, with whitish and opaque colonies on NA. Isolates 15A1 and 15A2 from C. annua and 16A1 from S. europaea were short, rod- shaped with creamy and translucent colonies on NA.

Molecular identification of isolates

Taxonomic positions of isolates were determined based on the sequence of the 16 S rRNA genes. Isolated endophytes were identified as belonging to six different genera: Acinetobacter (2 strains), Kushneria (4 strains), Pseudomonas (3 strains), Halomonas (7 strains), Halobacillus (2 strains), Planococcus (1 strain), and Klebsiella (1 strain). The percentage of 16 S rRNA gene sequence similarities (98.93–100%) of these isolates to the closest type strains is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Morphological characteristics, salt tolerance, and taxonomic identity of root endophytes associated with succulent halophytes
Full size table

Salt tolerance of isolated bacteria

The isolated endophytes display variable growth at different salt concentrations (Table 1). All tested strains were able to grow on NA without additional NaCl. The members of the Halobacillus genus showed the capacity to grow at the highest salinity level (25% NaCl). Kushneria and Halomonas strains were able to grow in a wide range of NaCl concentrations up to 18%, while Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Klebsiella strains isolated as ACC deaminase producers, couldn’t grow at salt concentrations higher than 3%.

PGP activities of isolates

The PGP activities of isolated endophytes were tested at different concentrations of NaCl (0, 3, and 7% NaCl (w/v)). Isolates that were able to grow only in up to 3% NaCl were tested for PGP traits only in 0 and 3% NaCl. The obtained results for the PGP potential of isolates were summarized in Table 2. In the absence of NaCl, all isolates exhibited at least three, while 20% of isolates exhibited 7 of 8 tested PGP traits.

Ninhydrin test revealed that five strains isolated on DF media with ACC as sole nitrogen source could utilize and decrease the initial concentration of 3 mM ACC in DF media during 16 h incubation. After growing in media supplemented with L-tryptophan, 9 bacteria were positive for IAA production. The amount of produced IAA ranged from 2.10 to 4.62 µg ml-1. The strain Halomonas sp. 14KX2 was found to produce the highest amounts of IAA (4.62 and 4.00 µg ml in 0% and 3% NaCl, respectively). Another Halomonas strain, 16K2, could produce IAA across the entire range of NaCl concentrations with the maximal production at 7% NaCl. With increasing salt concentration, 56% of IAA producing strains lost that capability.

The qualitative assessment of ammonia production showed that 90% of tested bacteria produced ammonia in the absence of NaCl and retained the production in the presence of 3% NaCl. In media amended with 7% NaCl, 22% of isolates (14.2, 15K2, 16.4, and 16KX2) lost the ability to produce ammonia.

In CAS medium without NaCl, 75% of strains formed the orange halos surrounding colonies indicating the siderophore production. Three Kushneria (14KX1, 16.1, and 16KX1) and two Halomonas (14KX2 and 15K13) strains retained the ability of siderophore production at each of the tested salt concentrations.

EPS were produced by 95% of tested bacteria in media without NaCl and 47% of them maintained that feature in the presence of various NaCl concentrations.

Out of all tested bacteria, 35% showed ability for K, P, or Zn solubilization. Five ACC deaminase producers (14A2, 14A5, 15A1, 15A2, and 16A1) showed the potential to solubilize potassium, phosphorus, and zinc from inorganic sources in the media without and with 3% NaCl. The solubilization of nutrients on 7% NaCl could be established only for one halotolerant isolate, Kuschneria 16.1, which could solubilize phosphorus in the presence of every tested concentration of NaCl. The nutrient solubilization ability was found to be inversely proportional to salt concentration. Among nutrient solubilizing strains Klebsiella 14A5 exhibited the highest Si values for K (8.64 and 5.12 at 0% and 3% NaCl, respectively), P (4.53 and 3.29 at 0% and 3% NaCl, respectively), and Zn (5.05 and 5.55 at 0% and 3% NaCl, respectively).

The biofilm-forming ability of selected strains was affected by the increase of NaCl concentration (Table 2). All of the tested isolates showed biofilm-forming ability in the absence of NaCl, which was classified as weak (55% of strains) and moderate (40%). At 3% NaCl, 50% of isolates were classified as weak, 30% as moderate biofilm producers, while Acinetobacter 14A5 lost its biofilm-forming ability. Halomonas 16K2 showed the highest OD630 value of 0.203 at 3% NaCl and retained moderate biofilm production at 7% NaCl concentration. At 7% NaCl, 26.6% of isolates lost the ability to form biofilms while others retained biofilm production (60% as weak and 13.4% as moderate).

Table 2 Plant growth-promoting ability of endophytes at different salt concentrations
Full size table

Discussion

The seal of Slano Kopovo is characterized by its specific vegetation, related to the flora of salt marshes and consisting of diverse halophytes among which succulents stand out. S. europaea, S. maritima and C. annua grow on extremely saline and periodically flooded solonchak to highly saline solonchak and solonetz under moderate humidity conditions [39]. They represent a part of genuine halophyte plant cover which has almost disappeared from most of the Pannonian area [66].

There is a limited number of studies on the structure of endophytic communities associated with halophytes in different natural saline habitats. Only a few studies describe endophytic communities associated with Salicornia genus [18], especially Salicornia europaea [21, 64, 72, 73], and even fewer describe the endophytic microbiota associated with representatives of Suaeda genus [71, 75]. There are no reported data on endophyte microbiota communities associated with Suaeda maritima and Camphorosma genus in the current literature.

The shore of the Slano Kopovo salt lake was the location where all samples were collected, so the diversity of halotolerant halophyte associated endophytic bacteria was not expected to depend on the physico-chemical properties of soil but rather on specificity of the plant host. Our results showed that all three plants shared substantial portion of microbiota (50% of the most abundant genera in all three plants) but that the distribution of the major bacterial phyla was almost identical for S. maritima and C. annua and differed for S. europaea. C. annua showed the lowest diversity of taxa, whereas compositional complexity was higher in S. maritima and S. europaea. This structural community complexity pattern of three plant endophytic microbiota (C. annua < S. maritima < S. europaea) was repeated down all taxonomic levels up to genus level.

The majority of abundant genera and their most prominent species in the microbiota were, unsurprisingly, previously described as marine or halotolerant organisms or were described as yellow-pigmented bacteria. The majority of isolates obtained as a cultivable portion of the halophyte microbiota had yellow to orange pigmented colonies, indicating potential carotenoid production. Production of pigments with significant antioxidant and antimicrobial activity which help bacteria to cope with stress conditions, photo-oxidation, and free radicals is common at high salinity (Fariq et al. [17]). For the less common genera in analyzed microbiota, there is no literature data on some specific PGP trait or interaction with plants. However, some of them are present in a fairly high percentage (5.52% of bacteria with high identity to Isoptericola halotolerans in S. europaea, 4.24% of members of genus Ocenisphera in S. maritima, or 4.75% of Hydrogenophaga in C. annua root endophytic microbiota) suggesting the adaptive advantage they bring to the plant host.

The other portion of the most abundant genera in three plants endophytic microbiota consists of genera whose PGP traits have been well documented in the literature (Table 3). Streptomyces genus is renowned for its secondary metabolites that are in human use as antibiotics and antimicotics. This considerable potential was obviously harnessed by plants as well, to serve biocontrol purposes [10]. Streptomyces contribute to plant wellbeing in various manners possessing a “full package” of PGP traits (IAA, ACC, siderophore production, and even the ability to fix N2) [70]. Rhizobium is a genus found in all three plants and is known for its nitrogen fixation ability and, recently, for various other PGP traits [68]. Halomonas genus was expected to be present in the halophyte host environment (in S. europaea this genus makes for 7.82% of endophyte microbiota) and under saline stress produces exopolysaccharides [42], but also have IAA and siderophore producing ability [19]. Some species of the genus show phosphate solubilization, ammonia and ACC deaminase production, and nitrogen fixation abilities [40]. Our endophyte isolation strategy allowed us to cultivate and characterize seven Halomonas sp. Isolates, six of which are closely related (> 99.86% similarity) to Halomonas songnenensis, a moderately halophilic bacterium from saline and alkaline soils [31]. Halomonas sp. were previously noted as a root endophyte of S. brachiata [30]. Azoarcus genus is present in all three plants microbiota, but in C. annua it accounts for an astonishing 17.66%. This is another genus containing nitrogen fixating and IAA producing species [54] that seems to be devoid of plant pathogenic traits but possesses genes suggesting a biocontrol role [33]. Finally, the most prominent genus in all three plants endophytic microbiota, making between 6 and 17%, was the genus Pseudomonas. There are numerous Pseudomonas strains that are characterized as PGP, as well as plant pathogens. The strains that promote plant growth are able to synthetize IAA, cytokines, iron-chelating molecules, and antimicrobial peptides, and have the ability of nitrogen fixation [50, 74]. Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, the most abundant species in the S. maritima and C. annua microbiota (5.45% and 6.82%, respectively), is proved to have various PGP traits [32] as well as the ability to tolerate high salinity. These PGP abilities are present in 3 Pseudomonas strains isolated from C. annua and S. europaea.

Table 3 PGP traits of most common and abundant genera in three plants’ endophyte microbiota
Full size table

Yamamoto et al. [73] showed that endophyte diversity and the community structure associated with each halophyte differed between two nearby natural saline sites. Comparing S. europaea endophytes from different and geographically distant habitats showed that none of the common genera in the mentioned study of S. europaea endophyte seemed to be even present in S. europaea from Slano Kopovo. Although strikingly different genera form the endophytic microbiome of various studied Suaeda plants, depending on physico-chemical composition of the soil and soil bacteria available for recruiting, the potential PGP traits these microbiota are conveying have been persistent.

The diversity of halotolerant endophytes associated with halophyte roots suggests that different halophyte adopt the same ecological strategies to combat salinity stress by attracting microbiota with specific metabolic traits. These traits can be further harnessed from the cultivable portion of the endophytic microbiome to improve agricultural plants’ growth and salt tolerance. In Suaeda salsa microbiota contributing to salt stress acclimatization, nutrient solubilization, and competitive root colonization were detected forming a potential core microbiome [75] capable to support plant wellbeing. We expect in further work to be able to form such a potential core microbiome based on cultivable halotolerant endophytic bacteria that we described in this study.

A cultivable fraction of HPGPE

The identification by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing revealed the distribution of selected cultivable endophytes into seven genera belonging to two phyla, Proteobacteria (85%) and Firmicutes (15%).

The majority of cultivable endophytes detected in this study belong to the common halotolerant/halophilic genera Halomonas, Kushneria, and Halobacillus (Table 1). The genera Halomonas and Halobacillus include halophiles that are adaptable to salinity changes and thus are able to grow in a wide range of salt concentrations [28]. The genus Kushneria, along with Halomonas, is an important member of the family Halomonadaceae, a taxonomic group within the Gammaproteobacteria that are typical of hypersaline environments [40]. Taxonomic identification of the obtained isolates showed that Halomonas was the predominant genus within the halotolerant root-associated bacteria of all three halophytes. Genera Halomonas, Kushneria, and Halobacillus reported in this study as endophyte, were isolated from the rhizosphere of Salicornia [40], while Kushneria is found exclusively as endophytic in leaves of Salicornia [41] and halophyte Arthrocnemum macrostachyum [44]. In contrast to Halomonas, a genus abundant in all three plant microbiota, and Halobacillus that is a rare genus in S. europaea (0.23%), from whose microbiome two isolates were obtained, Kushneria was below the detection level in S. maritima and C. annua, and present only 0.0009% among S. europaea microbiota. We presume that the cultivation conditions that we applied were favorable for the isolation of this rare genus.

Acinetobacter is a genus found across various habitats, often in harsh conditions like hypersaline environments [11] and it is also commonly found as an endophyte [3]. The species with high similarity to A. haemoliticus was among the highly abundant species among endophytes of S. maritima (2.27%), however, the two isolated Acinetobacter sp. from the same plant had the highest similarity to A. calcoaceticus (99.79% and 100% similarity) which was not detected in 16 S rDNA analysis. Another cultivated bacteria that was below the level of detection was Klebsiella isolated on DF media from a root of S. maritima. Klebsiella isolate was 99.93% similar to K. aerogenes, reported in the leaves of Suaeda salsa [59].

Due to nutritional and metabolic versatility, Pseudomonas species inhabit diverse habitats demonstrating different lifestyles [3], including endophytic [29]. Gram-positive endophyte Planococcus were isolated from C. annua roots and identified as P. rifietoensis (99.88%). P. rifietoensis was reported as an endophyte associated with S. europaea in Zhao et al. [76].

Halotolerance of selected HPGPE

In terms of salt tolerance, the isolates belonging to the genera Halomonas, Kushneria, Halobacilus, and Planococcus showed the ability to grow in a broad range of salt concentrations (12–25%). Bearing in mind that saline soils are characterized by significant heterogeneity in salt distribution and a wide range of salt concentrations surrounding one single plant [6], a level of halotolerance is an important criterion to select strains for a potential application. Bacterial strategy involving the synthesis or uptake of compatible organic solutes to maintain osmotic cell potential, makes them more flexible and adaptable to changing salinity [28]. This type of adaptation is widespread among members of the Halomonadaceae family [28].

In addition to developing mechanisms for their survival under stress, HPGP increase plant host tolerance to salinity stress (Shrivarstava and Kumar 2015) through mechanisms that act in an integrated manner to mitigate hostile environmental impacts. In the current study, tested endophytes exhibited multiple PGP features even under conditions of elevated NaCl concentration, suggesting their role in host growth promotion and contribution to abiotic stress tolerance.

PGP potential of halotolerant endophytes

The phytohormone activity has a key role in plant adaptations to diverse stresses. Production of IAA, the most prevalent auxin in plants, is an important feature of HPGPE that affects plant growth. 45% of the isolates distributed among five genera showed the ability to produce IAA (Table 2). All of them produced IAA in the absence of NaCl, except Acinetobacter 14.2 which produced IAA only at 3% NaCl. Planococcus, Kuchneria, Halobacillus, and some Halomonas strains lost the ability to produce IAA at increased salt concentrations. Upadhyay et al. [67] reported that the level of IAA produced by isolates decreased with increasing NaCl concentration. In this study, Halomonas 16K2, isolated from S.europaea (Halomonas songnenensis 99.93% similarity) stands out because of the positive correlation between IAA production and substrate salt concentration.

Boosting the growth of roots and stems, exogenous IAA improves the exploitation of nutrients from saline soil and can contribute to leaf growth which is important for plant productivity under saline conditions [12, 16]. Inoculation of wheat with halotolerant IAA producing bacteria, isolated from highly saline habitats, including Halomonas sp., resulted in improved fitness of wheat on salt-affected soil [65] indicating a bacterial role in augmenting plant resistance to salt stress.

Lowering ethylene levels is the most prominent bacterial PGP feature in alleviating harmful effects of stress on plants [15, 16].

Isolates that showed positive ACC deaminase activity in this study belonged to the genera Acinetobacter, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas (Table 2). ACC deaminase activity among Pseudomonas species is widely observed [2, 49], while Acinetobacter ACC deaminase activity along with Pseudomonas was reported by Govindasamy et al. [26]. Multiple-PGP Klebsiella sp. SBP-8 role in induced systemic tolerance in wheat under salt stress has been reported [62]. Siddike et al. [61], noted that halotolerant bacteria expressing IAA and ACC deaminase are more effective in stimulating plant cell elongation and dry weight in canola than bacteria which were sole ACC deaminase producers. None of the isolates in this study showed both PGP abilities, but the obtained collection brings the possibility for the design of effective consortia for potential application.

Under saline conditions, plant growth and productivity are reduced because of nutrient imbalance [16]. By increasing the availability of nutrients to plants, endophytes can enhance directly their growth and fitness.

Ammonia production is a common PGP trait that directly supports plant growth via nitrogen supply [46]. The majority of isolates showed the ability of ammonia production at increased salt concentrations. Two Kushneria strains could not produce ammonia, but this was not a genus-specific pattern as the third strain tested positive at any salt concentration. Ammonia production appears to be a frequent trait of Halomonas, as all isolates were positive and retained this ability with increasing salt concentrations.

Growing on salty soils, plants are simultaneously affected by salinity and a limited amount of bioavailable Fe, which is a common problem for calcareous and saline-sodic soils around the world [1]. Halotolerant PGPE, especially those associated with halophytes, produce Fe siderophores which represent small, soluble complexes that can be easily absorbed by plants [15, 45]. In this study, the siderophore production ability varied among members of the same genus (Table 2). Among Kushneria and Halomonas were the strains that produced siderophore in presence of increased salt concentration indicating a contribution to the availability of Fe to host plants. All Pseudomonas strains were positive for siderophore production.

Phosphorus is an essential plant nutrient required for all main processes in plant physiology. Phosphate solubilization activity is a PGP feature of halotolerant bacteria associated with halophytes [5, 77]. Besides strains with ACC deaminase activity, only Kushneria 16.1, showed and retained phosphate solubilization ability at every tested salt concentration. The high phosphate solubilization ability of halotolerant Kushneria isolated from saltern sediments was reported in Zhu et al. [78]. In the present study, Acinetobacter 14A2, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas fluorescens expressed phosphate solubilization ability at their maximum salt tolerant concentration of 3% NaCl (Table 2).

In most of the soil K is in a form inaccessible to plants, but PGP bacteria can solubilize K-bearing minerals and release potassium that plants can uptake [14]. In this study, ACC-positive strains demonstrated remarkable potential for solubilization of K, P, and Zn. ACC-positive strains in this study possess multiple PGP traits (produce ammonia, siderophore, EPS, and biofilm) indicating that ACC deaminase positive bacteria are among the most potent PGP microbes and unequivocally support the growth and survival of their host.

As a co-factor of many enzymes, zinc is an important micronutrient that plays a vital role in various metabolic processes in plants, and its deficiency adversely affects the growth and development of plants [24, 45]. In terms of zinc solubilization ability, Klebsiella and Acinetobacter 14A2 (Table 2) stood out by the size of the halo zone and the positive correlation with the salt concentration. In the case of Pseudomonas strains, their zinc solubilization ability slightly decreased with increasing salt concentrations. Zinc solubilization ability is recorded for Acinetobacter strain isolated from rice roots [24], Gontia-Mishra et al. [25] reported the zinc solubilization ability of ACC-positive Klebsiella pneumonie and Pseudomonas aeruginosa which exhibited multiple PGP traits such as P and K solubilization.

The production of EPS and biofilm formation are important PGP features under the conditions of salt-imposed stress. Due to the ability to bind cations, bacterial EPS restrict Na+ available for plant uptake [67], and shield the root from high salt concentrations (Ruppel et al. [56]). EPS are important components that support biofilm expansion and stabilize its structure, but an abundance of EPS is not an indication for biofilm formation [51]. As highly hydrating substances with cementing features, bacterial EPS plays a vital role in the formation and stabilization of soil aggregates thus improving soil structure (Otlewska et al. [45]). Halomonas meridiana 14KX2 and Halomonas songnenensis 16K2 stood out for their ability to produce biofilm and EPS at different salinity levels. Halomonas meridiana PAa6 showed maximal biofilm production at 1 M NaCl (~ 5.5% NaCl) and was more effective in biofilm formation, EPS production, and root colonization under saline and non-saline conditions in comparison to Kushneria indalinina and Halomonas aquamarina [52]. Similarly, in our study Kushneria indalinina strains 16.1 and 16.2, produced EPS in the presence of increased salt concentration but were less effective in biofilm formation in comparison to Halomonas meridiana 14KX2. Halotolerant Halomonas variabilis and Planococcus riftoensis strains showed a positive correlation between EPS production and biofilm-forming and increasing salinity. These strains had a positive influence on the formation of aggregates in the soil and on plant roots [52]. Generally, in our study increasing salt concentration induced reduction but not complete loss of the ability of tested isolates for EPS production and biofilm-forming (Table 2). The results indicate that bacteria that stayed positive for the tested features could potentially develop communities under salt stress and colonize plant roots and soil particles, which is vital for potential application in salt-affected soils. Among the representatives of the genus Halomonas, which dominated among cultivated bacteria and showed multiple PGP properties, 14KKS2 and 16K2 Halomonas songinensis stood out because they retained PGP traits under conditions of increased salinity.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that halophytes’ root endosphere is a significant source for the selection of bacteria with a potential to improve plant fitness under saline stress. Therefore, besides salinity being a key environmental factor, plant species are also determinative for the endophyte community composition. The relative abundances of phyla, classes, and orders primarily revealed differences between S. maritima and C. annua on one side, and S. europaea on the other side. Within the presented work, we obtained a cultivable part of halophyte microbiomes exhibiting all PGP traits important for nutrition, growth stimulation, and stress resistance of plants. Thus, the obtained collection provides a solid basis for the formulation of consortium containing core endophyte microbiome conferring all desirable traits. The results also highlight the potential of using habitat-adapted, indigenous endophytic bacteria to enhance the growth and ameliorate abiotic stress damage of host plants growing in special habitats.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated during this study are included in this article and its Additional file 1.

References

  1. Abbas H, Patel RM, Parekh VB. Culturable endophytic bacteria from halotolerant Salicornia brachata L.: isolation and plant growth promoting traits. IJAM. 2018;21:10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali S, Charles TC, Glick BR. Amelioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain ACC deaminase. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;80:160–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alibrandi P, Schnell S, Perotto S, Cardinale M. Diversity and structure of the endophytic bacterial communities associated with three terrestrial orchid species as revealed by 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:604964.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;15:403–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aslam F, Ali B. Halotolerant bacterial diversity associated with Suaeda fruticosa (L.) Forssk. improved growth of maize under salinity stress. Agronomy. 2018;8:131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bazihizina N, Barrett-Lennard E, Colmer T. Plant growth and physiology under heterogeneous salinity. Plant Soil. 2012;354:1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: high resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. Microbiology: a laboratory manual. Menlo Park: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co. Inc; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Colombo EM, Kunova A, Pizzatti C, Saracchi M, Cortesi P, Pasquali M. Selection of an endophytic Streptomyces sp. strain DEF09 from wheat roots as a biocontrol agent against Fusarium graminearum. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK, Kim J. Acinetobacter halotolerans sp. nov., a novel halotolerant, alkalitolerant, and hydrocarbon degrading bacterium, isolated from soil. Arch Microbiol. 2017;199:701–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dodd IC, Pérez-Alfocea F. Microbial amelioration of crop salinity stress. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:3415–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dworkin M, Foster JW. Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen. J Bacteriol. 1958;75:592–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Etesami H, Emami S, Alikhani H. Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2017;17:897–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Etesami H, Beattie GA. Mining halophytes for plant growth-promoting halotolerant bacteria to enhance the salinity tolerance of non-halophytic crops. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Etesami H, Glick BR. Halotolerant plant growth–promoting bacteria: prospects for alleviating salinity stress in plants. Environ Exp Bot. 2020;178:104124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fariq A, Yasmin A, Jamil M. Production, characterization and antimicrobial activities of bio-pigments by Aquisalibacillus elongatus MB592, Salinicoccus sesuvii MB597, and Halomonas aquamarina MB598 isolated from Khewra Salt Range. Pak Extremophiles. 2019;23:435–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferreira MJ, Cunha A, Figueiredo S, Faustino P, Patinha C, Silva H, Sierra-Garcia IN. The root microbiome of Salicornia ramosissima as a seedbank for plant-growth promoting halotolerant bacteria. Appl Sci. 2021;11:2233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Figueroa LO, Schwarz B, Richards AM. Structural characterization of amphiphilic siderophores produced by a soda lake isolate, Halomonas sp. SL01, reveals cysteine-, phenylalanine- and proline-containing head groups. Extremophiles. 2015;19:1183–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Flowers TJ, Colmer TD. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol. 2008;179:945–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Furtado BU, Gołębiewski M, Skorupa M, Hulisz P, Hrynkiewicz K. Bacterial and fungal endophytic microbiomes of Salicornia europaea. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e00305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA, Day NJ, Best AS, Dunfield KE. Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot. 2013;100:1738–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gamalero E, Glick BR. Bacterial modulation of plant ethylene levels. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:13–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gandhi A, Muralidharan G. Assessment of zinc solubilizing potentiality of Acinetobacter sp. isolated from rice rhizosphere. Euro J Soil Biol. 2016;76:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gontia-Mishra I, Sapre S, Tiwari S. Zinc solubilizing bacteria from the rhizosphere of rice as prospective modulator of zinc biofortification in rice. Rhizosphere. 2017;3:185–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Govindasamy V, Raina SK, George P, Kumar M, Rane J, Minhas PS, Vittal KPR. Functional and phylogenetic diversity of cultivable rhizobacterial endophytes of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:925–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guimarães DP, Costa FAA, Rodrigues MI, Maugeri F. Optimization of dextran synthesis and acidic hydrolisis by surface response analysis. Braz J Chem Eng. 1999;16:129–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gunde-Cimerman N, Plemenitaš A, Oren A. Strategies of adaptation of microorganisms of the three domains of life to high salt concentrations. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018;42:353–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttilä AM, Compant S, Campisano A, Döring M, Sessitsch A. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2015;79:293–320.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jha B, Gontia I, Hartmann A. The roots of the halophyte Salicornia brachiata are a source of new halotolerant diazotrophic bacteria with plant growth-promoting potential. Plant Soil. 2012;356:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang J, Pan Y, Hu S, Zhang X, Hu B, Huang H, Hong S, Meng J, Li C, Wang K. Halomonas songnenensis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from saline and alkaline soils. Int J Syst Evol Microb. 2014;64:1662–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan MMA, Duan J, Glick BR, Finnegan PM, Kabli SA, Al-Garni SMS. Draft genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes KB-10. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2021;10:e00311–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Krause A, Ramakumar A, Bartels D, Battistoni F, Bekel T, Boch J, Böhm M, Friedrich F, Hurek T, Krause L, et al. Complete genome of the mutualistic, N2-fixing grass endophyte Azoarcus sp. strain BH72. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1385–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kumawat KC, Sharma P, Nagpal S, Gupta RK, Sirari A, Nair RM, Bindumadhava H, Singh S. Dual microbial inoculation, a game changer? - bacterial biostimulants with multifunctional growth promoting traits to mitigate salinity stress in spring mungbean. Front Microbiol. 2021;11:600576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lakshmanan V, Shantharaj D, Li G, Seyfferth LA, Sherrieri AL, Bais HP. A natural rice rhizospheric bacterium abates arsenic accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta. 2015;242:1037–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lata R, Chowdhury S, Gond SK, White JF Jr. Induction of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by endophytic microbes. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018;66:268–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li Z, Chang S, Lin L, Li Y, An Q. A colorimetric assay of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) based on ninhydrin reaction for rapid screening of bacteria containing ACC deaminase. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011;53:178–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematic. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons; 1991. pp. 115–75.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Luković MS. Vegetation of saline habitats of Serbia with an assessment of the sustainable use and conservation [dissertation]. Belgrade (BG): University of Belgrade, Serbia; 2019.

  40. Mapelli F, Marasco R, Rolli E, Barbato M, Cherif H, Guesmi A, Ouzari I, Daffonchio D, Borin S. Potential for plant growth promotion of rhizobacteria associated with Salicornia growing in Tunisian hypersaline soils. Biomed Res Int. 2013;248078.

  41. Mora-Ruiz Mdel R, Font-Verdera F, Díaz-Gil C, Urdiain M, Rodríguez-Valdecantos G, González B, Orfila A, Rosselló-Móra R. Moderate halophilic bacteria colonizing the phylloplane of halophytes of the subfamily Salicornioideae (Amaranthaceae). Syst Appl Microbiol. 2015;38:406–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mukherjee P, Mitra A, Roy M. Halomonas rhizobacteria of Avicennia marina of indian sundarbans promote rice growth under saline and heavy metal stresses through exopolysaccharide production. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Nautiyal CS. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;170:265–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Navarro-Torre S, Mateos-Naranjo E, Caviedes MA, Pajuelo E, Rodríguez-Llorente ID. Isolation of plant-growth-promoting and metal-resistant cultivable bacteria from Arthrocnemum macrostachyum in the Odiel marshes with potential use in phytoremediation. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;110:133–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Otlewska A, Migliore M, Dybka-Stępień K, Manfredini A, Struszczyk-Świta K, Napoli R, Białkowska A, Canfora L, Pinzari F. When salt meddles between plant, soil, and microorganisms. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:553087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Orhan F. Alleviation of salt stress by halotolerant and halophilic plant growth-promoting bacteria in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47:621–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Patten CL, Glick BR. Role of Pseudomonas putida indole acetic acid in development of host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;48:3795–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Paulo ME, Vasconcelos PM, Oliveira SI, Affe MH, Nascimento R, De Melo SI, De Abreu Roque MR, De Assis SA. An alternative method for screening lactic acid bacteria for the production of exopolysaccharides with rapid confirmation. Food Sci Technol. 2012;32:710–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Penrose MD, Glick RB. Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase- containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Physiol Plant. 2003;118:10–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Preston GM. Plant perceptions of plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;359:907–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Qurashi AW, Sabri AN. Bacterial exopolysaccharide and biofilm formation stimulate chickpea growth and soil aggregation under salt stress. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;43:1183–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Qurashi AW, Sabri AN. Biofilm formation in moderately halophilic bacteria is influenced by varying salinity levels. J Basic Microbiol. 2012;52:566–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rajawat MVS, Singh S, Tyagi SP, Saxena AK. A modifed plate assay for rapid screening of potassium-solubilizing bacteria. Pedosphere. 2016;26:768–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Reinhold B, Hurek T, Gillis M, Hoste B, Vancanneyt M, Kersters K, Ley J. Azoarcus gen. nov., Nitrogen-fixing Proteobacteria associated with roots of Kallar Grass (Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth), and description of two species, Azoarcus indigens sp. nov. and Azoarcus communis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microb. 1993;43:574–84.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rodríguez-Llorente ID, Pajuelo E, Navarro-Torre S, Mesa-Marín J, Caviedes MA. Bacterial endophytes from halophytes: how do they help plants to alleviate salt stress? In: Kumar M, Etesami H, Kumar V, editors. Saline soil-based agriculture by halotolerant microorganisms. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 147–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Ruppel S, Franken P, Witzel K. Properties of the halophyte microbiome and their implications for plant salt tolerance. Funct Plant Biol. 2013;40:940–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Schlaeppi K, Domborowski N, Oter RG, van Ver Loren E, Schulze-Lefert P. Quantitative divergence of the bacterial root microbiota in Arabidopsis thaliana relatives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:585–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Shang N, Ding M, Dai M, Si H, Li S, Zhao G. Biodegradation of malachite green by an endophytic bacterium Klebsiella aerogenes S27 involving a novel oxidoreductase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:2141–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Shrivastava P, Kumar R. Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015;22:123–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Siddikee MA, Chauhan PS, Anandham R, Han GH, Sa T. Isolation, characterization and use for plant growth promotion under salt stress, of ACC deaminase-producing halotolerant bacteria derived from coastal soil. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;20:1577–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Singh RP, Jha P, Jha PN. The plant-growth-promoting bacterium Klebsiella sp. SBP-8 confers induced systemic tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under salt stress. J Plant Physiol. 2015;184:57–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Stepanović S, Vuković D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukiv S, Cirković I, Ruzicka F. Quanitification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendationsa for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS. 2007;15:891–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Szymańska S, Borruso L, Brusetti L, Hulisz P, Furtado B, Hrynkiewicz K. Bacterial microbiome of root-associated endophytes of Salicornia europaea in correspondence to different levels of salinity. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25:25420–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Tiwari S, Singh P, Tiwari R, Meena KK, Yandigeri M, Singh DP, Arora DK. Salt-tolerant rhizobacteria-mediated induced tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and chemical diversity in rhizosphere enhance plant growth. Biol Fertil Soils. 2011;47:907–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Tomić R, Mrkša M, Kovačević-Berleković B, Maksimović B, Dragosavac M, Imbronjev M. 2016. Nautical tourism sustainable resources of the municipality of Novi Bečej. Экономика, экология и общество России в 21-м столетии (EESR-2021), 198.

  67. Upadhyay SK, Singh JS, Singh DP. Exopolysaccharide plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria under salinity condition. Pedosphere. 2011;21:214–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S, Nasrulhaq Boyce A. Role of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability—a review. Molecules. 2016;21:573.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Ventosa A, Mellado E, Sánchez-Porro C, Márquez MC. Halophilic and halotolerant micro-organisms from soils. In: Dion P, Nautiyal CS, editors. Microbiology of extreme soils. Berlin(BE): Springer; 2008. pp. 87–115.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  70. Vurukonda SSKP, Giovanardi D, Stefani E. Plant growth promoting and biocontrol activity of Streptomyces spp. as endophytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:952.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Wang H, Narsing Rao MP, Gao Y, Li X, Gao R, Xie Y, Li Q, Li W. Insights into the endophytic bacterial community comparison and their potential role in the dimorphic seeds of halophyte Suaeda glauca. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Yamamoto K, Shiwa Y, Ishige T, Sakamoto H, Tanaka K, Uchino M, Tanaka N, Oguri S, Saitoh H, Tsushima S. Bacterial diversity associated with the rhizosphere and endosphere of two halophytes: Glaux maritima and Salicornia europaea. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Yamamoto K, Matsutani M, Shiwa Y, Ishige T, Sakamoto H, Saitoh H, Tsushima S. Comparative analysis of bacterial diversity and community structure in the rhizosphere and root endosphere of two halophytes, Salicornia europaea and Glaux maritima, collected from two brackish lakes in Japan. Microbes Environ. 2020;35:ME20072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Yan Y, Yang J, Dou Y, Chen M, Ping S, Peng J, Lu W, Zhang W, Yao Z, Li H, et al. Nitrogen fixation island and rhizosphere competence traits in the genome of root-associated Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:7564–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Yuan Z, Druzhinina IS, Labbé J, Redman R, Qin Y, Rodriguez R, Zhang C, Tuskan GA, Lin F. Specialized microbiome of a halophyte and its role in helping non-host plants to withstand salinity. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Zhao S, Zhou N, Zhao ZY, Zhang K, Wu GH, Tian CY. Isolation of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with the halophyte Salicornia europaea and evaluation of their promoting activity under salt stress. Curr Microbiol. 2016;73:574–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhou N, Zhao S, Tian CY. Effect of halotolerant rhizobacteria isolated from halophytes on the growth of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under salt stress. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017;364(11).

  78. Zhu F, Qu L, Hong X, Sun X. Isolation and characterization of a phosphate-solubilizing halophilic bacterium Kushneria sp. YCWA18 from Daqiao saltern on the coast of Yellow Sea of China. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;615032.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to dr Jelica Novaković, research associate (Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade) for her assistance in collection and determination of plants samples.

Funding

This research was funded by The Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, Grant Nos. 451-03-47/2023-01/200116 and 451-03-47/2023-01/200042.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, Zemun, 11080, Serbia

    Milica Dragojević, Vera Raičević & Jelena Jovičić-Petrović

  2. Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 444a, Belgrade, Serbia

    Nada Stankovic & Lidija Djokic

Authors
  1. Milica Dragojević
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nada Stankovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lidija Djokic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vera Raičević
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jelena Jovičić-Petrović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NS and LD analyzed microbiome data and did the 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. JJP and VR designed the experiment, MD colected the samples and performed isolation and characterization of bacteria. All authors participated in manuscript writing and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milica Dragojević.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dragojević, M., Stankovic, N., Djokic, L. et al. Endorhizosphere of indigenous succulent halophytes: a valuable resource of plant growth promoting bacteria. Environmental Microbiome 18, 20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-023-00477-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-023-00477-x

Keywords

Environmental Microbiome

ISSN: 2524-6372