Skip to main content

Table 1 Topological properties of microbial co-occurrence networks in the Chesapeake Bay

From: Estuarine gradients dictate spatiotemporal variations of microbiome networks in the Chesapeake Bay

Groups

Nodes

Edges

Fragmentation (f)

Average degree

Network diameter

Graph density

Modularity

Components

Average clustering coefficient

Average path length

Number of Clusters

Number of negative correlations

Percentage of negative correlations (%)

All

387

4130

0.18

21.3

8

0.055

0.513

3

0.509

3.118

7

286

6.92

Alla

377

3917

0.23

20.8

8

0.055

0.506

4

0.506

3.137

9

265

6.77

Allb

377

3525

0.19

18.7

8

0.050

0.54

3

0.497

3.163

8

272

7.72

Allc

377

3855

0.27

20.5

8

0.054

0.498

5

0.509

3.222

9

241

6.25

Winter

331

3430

0.12

20.7

8

0.063

0.554

2

0.392

2.822

9

526

15.34

Spring

340

3296

0

19.4

8

0.057

0.576

1

0.413

2.866

6

513

15.56

Summer

338

3983

0

23.6

6

0.070

0.576

1

0.427

2.638

6

720

18.08

Autumn

337

3790

0

22.5

6

0.067

0.591

1

0.446

2.700

6

707

18.65

Upper Bay

367

4526

0

24.7

7

0.067

0.538

1

0.474

2.859

7

344

7.60

Lower Bay

376

5012

0

26.7

8

0.071

0.534

1

0.479

2.799

7

559

11.15

  1. aAfter removal of top 10 nodes with the highest abundance
  2. bAfter removal of top 10 nodes with the most degree
  3. cAfter removal of top 10 nodes with the most betweenness centrality