Skip to main content

Table 1. Classification and general features of Candidatus Ruthia magnifica according to the MIGS recommendations.

From: Complete genome sequence of Candidatus Ruthia magnifica

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codea

MIGS-2

Current classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS[9]

  

Phylum Proteobacteria

 
  

Class Gammaproteobacteria

 
  

Gammaproteobacteria unclassified sulfur-oxidizing symbionts

 
  

Candidatus Ruthia magnifica

 
 

Gram stain

negative

NAS

 

Cell shape

coccus

TAS[4,5]

 

Motility

none

TAS[4,5]

 

Sporulation

nonsporulating

NAS

 

Temperature range

mesophile

NAS

 

Optimum temperature

unknown

 
 

Carbon source

CO2

TAS[6]

 

Energy source

H2S (Chemoautotroph)

TAS[6]

 

Terminal electron receptor

O2

TAS[6]

MIGS-6

Habitat

endosymbiont, marine, host, hydrothermal vents

TAS[3,4,5]

MIGS-6.3

Salinity

~34.6 pps

NAS

MIGS-22

Oxygen

aerobic

TAS [4,9]

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

symbiotic

TAS [4,9]

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

none

NAS

MIGS-4

Geographic location

9-North, East Pacific Rise, Hydrothermal vents

 

MIGS-5

Sample collection time

December 2004

TAS [9]

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

9° 51′ N

NAS

MIGS-4.2

Longitude

104° 18′ W

 

MIGS-4.3

Depth

~2500 m

NAS

  1. a) Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [13].