Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive information for each field soil in this study

From: Legacy effects of fumigation on soil bacterial and fungal communities and their response to metam sodium application

Fieldsa

Reps

Cropping system

pH

Soil series

Soil type

Rotation crop diversity

Dominant crop (# of years)

Metam Sodium Applied (# applications)c

f1

4

Conventional

7.33

Koehler/Quincy

Loamy sand/Fine sand

6

Potato (7)

1141 (3)

f2

2

Conventional

7.32

Koehler

Loamy sand

6

Corn (7)

1506 (4)

f3

4

Conventional

7.29

Koehler/Taunton

Loamy sand/Fine sandy loam

5

Alfalfa (11)

0 (0)

f4

4

Conventional

6.87

Koehler

Loamy sand

6

Potato (7)

1421 (4)

f5

4

Conventional

7.05

Koehler/Quincy

Loamy sand/Fine sand

6

Potato (7)

1777 (5)

f6

4

Conventional

6.91

Quincy

Fine sand

4

Corn (7)

702 (2)

f7

4

Conventional

6.98

Quincy

Fine sand

5

Potato (7)

1122 (3)

F8

4

Conventional

7.08

Quincy

Fine sand

4

Potato (7)

1216 (3)

f13b

4

Conventional

5.24

Timmerman

Sandy loam

4

Wheat (8)

0 (0)

f9

2

Organic

7.02

Sagehill/Taunton

Very fine sandy loam/Fine sandy loam

2

Corn (4)

0 (0)

f10

4

Organic

7.13

Quincy

Fine sand

7

Corn (4)

0 (0)

f11

4

Organic

7.46

Koehler/Sagehill/Taunton

Loamy sand/Very fine sandy loam/Fine sandy loam

4

Corn (5)

0 (0)

f12

4

Organic

7.25

Quincy

Fine sand

3

Corn (3)

0 (0)

  1. aFields f1–f6 had 21 years of crop rotation history; f7 had 20 years; f8 and f13 had 19 years; f10 and f11 had 13 years; f9 had 7 years, and f12 had 6 years
  2. bAmended with mustard green manure
  3. cLiter per hectare