Insights from the draft genome into the pathogenicity of a clinical isolate of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica Em3

Table 2 Percentage of in silico DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH)^a and average nucleotide identities (ANI)^b among the selected Elizabethkingia genomes

	E. meningoseptica EM3	E. anophelis R26^T [43]	E. meningoseptica ATCC 13253^T [44]	E. miricola BM10^T [45]	E. endophytica JM-87^T [46]
E. meningoseptica EM3		31.90 80.15	91.10 98.52	31.20 80.44	32.70 80.25
E. anophelis R26^T	31.90 80.15		33.60 80.26	68.80 91.52	78.60 97.49
E. meningoseptica ATCC 13253^T	91.10 98.52	33.60 80.26		31.40 80.26	33.30 80.41
E. miricola BM10^T	31.20 80.44	68.80 91.52	31.40 80.26		68.70 91.41
E. endophytica JM-87^T	32.70 80.25	78.60 97.49	33.30 80.41	68.70 91.41

Nucleotide sequences were downloaded from GenBank. The accession numbers for E. anophelis R26^T, E. meningoseptica ATCC 13253^T, E. miricola BM10^T and E. endophytica JM-87^T are NZ_ANIW01000001.1, NZ_ASAN01000001.1, NZ_CP011059.1 and NZ_CP016372, respectively
^aIn silico DNA-DNA hybridization was calculated by using Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) [47]. The percentage of DDH was shown on the top and bolded
^bANI values were computed for pairwise genome comparison with using the OrthoANIu algorithm [48]. The percentage of ANI was shown on the bottom

ISSN: 2524-6372